Register now to get rid of these ads!

Art & Inspiration Kansas HAMBers Unite!!! SEMA vs. HB2650!!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by NoSurf, Apr 2, 2010.

  1. NoSurf
    Joined: Jul 26, 2002
    Posts: 4,472

    NoSurf
    Member

    I got this email:



    <TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=2 width=603 bgColor=#000000 align=center><TBODY><TR><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 width=600 bgColor=#ffffff align=center><TBODY><TR><TD>[​IMG]</TD></TR><TR><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 width=590 align=center><TBODY><TR><TD>

    Kansas Bill Would Increase Fees for Antiques, Street Rods and Special Interest Vehicles
    Kansas legislation (H.B. 2650) was recently substantially amended in the Senate to raise the registration fee on antiques, street rods and special interest vehicles. The bill has already passed the House. The Senate substituted the House bill with all new language to increase the state’s revenue. One section of the substituted bill increases the registration fee for all passenger vehicles, and another two separate sections were inserted to specifically target antiques and street rods/special interest vehicles. Under the substituted bill, each of the registration fees would increase by $10 on January 1, 2013 and by another $10 on January 1, 2014.

    We Urge You to Contact Members of the Senate Transportation Committee (List Below) Immediately to Request Their Opposition to H.B. 2650
    • Under current law, an antique vehicle registration is a $40 one-time fee. A street rod or special interest vehicle is subject to an annual registration for a fee of $26.

    • H.B. 2650 increases the one-time antique vehicle registration fee to $50 on January 1, 2013 and to $60 on January 1, 2014.

    • H.B. 2650 increases the annual street rod or special interest vehicle registration to $36 on January 1, 2013 and to $46 on January 1, 2014.

    • H.B. 2650 ignores the fact that antique vehicles, street rods and special interest vehicles are driven less frequently than regular passenger vehicles (about one-third the miles each year as a new vehicle) and should therefore not be targeted as revenue boosters.

    • H.B. 2650 ignores the fact that many antique vehicles are owned and maintained by low and fixed income Americans who are less able to afford a higher registration fee.

    DON’T DELAY! Please contact members of the Kansas Senate Transportation Committee immediately by e-mail to request their opposition to H.B. 2650. Please e-mail a copy of your letter to Steve McDonald at [email protected]. Thank you for your assistance.
    Kansas Senate Transportation Committee

    Senator Dwayne Umbarger – Chairperson
    Phone: 785/296-7389
    Email: [email protected]

    Email: [email protected]


    Senator Bob Marshall – Vice Chairperson
    Phone: 785/296-7370
    Email: [email protected]

    Email: [email protected]


    Senator Pat Apple
    Phone: 785/296-7368
    Email: [email protected]
    Email: [email protected]


    Senator Les Donovan
    Phone: 785/296-7385
    Email: [email protected]

    Email: [email protected]


    Senator Terrie Huntington
    Phone: 785/296-7369
    Email: [email protected]

    Email: [email protected]


    Senator Mike Petersen
    Phone: 785/296-7355
    Email: [email protected]

    Email: [email protected]


    Senator Vicki Schmidt
    Phone: 785/296-7374
    Email: [email protected]

    Email: [email protected]


    Senator Kelly Kultala
    Phone: 785/296-7357
    Email: [email protected]

    Email: [email protected]


    Senator Anthony Hensley
    Phone: 785/296-3245
    Email: [email protected]

    Email: [email protected]


    </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>



    Please take the time to email or call some of the "representatives" to voice your disapproval of this tax increase!

    Here is my response:

    Dear Sir,

    I am emailing you to voice my opposition to H.B. 2650, which will RAISE my tax on future antique vehicles I own.

    I suppose these days it is unlikely that someone that is elected to represent me in government would actually listen and understand how I would be against raising my tax by 50% in the span of 2 years?

    How can you justify that amount of tax increase? Did my usage of the road that I drive on increase that much? Or is it the fact that times are tough these days and I choose not to drive it and you lose gasoline tax revenue?

    I am an automotive preservationist and concerned voter.


    Respectfully yours,
    Jay D. Sweet

     
  2. troy5118
    Joined: Oct 21, 2008
    Posts: 81

    troy5118
    Member
    from Haven Ks

    Thanks for posting this.
     
  3. hotrod32@usfamily.net
    Joined: Jan 24, 2008
    Posts: 251

    [email protected]
    Member
    from st paul

    Geez are you sure this is not mn.
     
  4. wvenfield
    Joined: Nov 23, 2006
    Posts: 5,584

    wvenfield
    Member

    Someone has to pay for road upkeep, no?

    You would prefer potholes over an extra $10-$20 one time charge? Road maintenence workers deserve raises also.

    I really don't see much out of line here. (I'm not asked to pay it either but I wouldn't complain if I was).
     

  5. NoSurf
    Joined: Jul 26, 2002
    Posts: 4,472

    NoSurf
    Member

    So you feel I should pay an additonal 50% increase? For road upkeep? If it's no big deal to you then go ahead and send me the twenty bucks for each vehicle I register.

    Of course I would not prefer potholes. What kind of obtuse mindset is that? Oh, but why not just take more money from the tax base? Road maintenance workers deserve a raise? In this economy?
     
  6. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    How many guys have to stare at the pothole before it fills back up?
    In Kansas we have 3 seasons. Winter, Spring, and road construction.
     
  7. NoSurf
    Joined: Jul 26, 2002
    Posts: 4,472

    NoSurf
    Member

    And my first reply:


    Mr. Sweet:


    Thank you for your email. I did not vote to have this bill advance out of committee, due to several concerns I have with the bill.


    The bill has a LONG way to go, and I would guess that several changes will be made along the way.


    Thanks for taking time to contact me.


    Sincerely,


    Vicki



    Vicki Schmidt
    Kansas Senator
    Assistant Majority Leader
    [email protected]





     
  8. cadillac daddyo
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 420

    cadillac daddyo
    Member
    from wichita ks

    tahnks for posting this up i will be sure to send out some emails tonight
     
  9. NoSurf
    Joined: Jul 26, 2002
    Posts: 4,472

    NoSurf
    Member

    Great news!

    <TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 width=600 bgColor=#ffffff align=center><TBODY><TR><TD>[​IMG]</TD></TR><TR><TD><TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 width=590 align=center><TBODY><TR><TD>

    URGENT LEGISLATIVE ALERT (UPDATE)
    Kansas Bill to Increase Fees for Antiques, Street Rods and Special Interest Vehicles Defeated
    The SAN convinced Kansas legislators to delete provisions from a revenue bill that increased the fees on antiques, street rods and special interest vehicles. The language sought to raise the registration fees on these vehicles, including a $10 increase on January 1, 2013 and another $10 increase on January 1, 2014. After alerting SAN members in the state of the impending fee increases, hobbyists responded in full force with emails and phone calls to their state representatives. The response facilitated the removal of the fee increases for both antiques and special interest vehicles/street rods (which are treated as one category under Kansas law).
    On behalf of the SEMA Action Network, congratulations and thanks to all who participated in opposing these fee increases.


    </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
     
  10. Good job Jay!
     
  11. general gow
    Joined: Feb 5, 2003
    Posts: 6,410

    general gow
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.