Register now to get rid of these ads!

Is a IFS from Elcamino worth Saving

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by tootallrodder, Mar 3, 2007.

  1. tootallrodder
    Joined: Jan 7, 2003
    Posts: 403

    tootallrodder
    Member Emeritus

    I am getting ready to scrap out a 87 El Camino. The back of the frame is gone due to rust. I know it is not a Camero or Nova subframe but has anyone used one on a 50's truck to get the benifits of the newer suspension and handling characteristics.
     
  2. Frosty21
    Joined: Jan 25, 2007
    Posts: 958

    Frosty21
    Member
    from KY

    Its G-Body stuff, which makes it pretty much the same as a Malibu, Monte Carlo, Turbo Buick, etc.

    I'm pretty sure that Monte Carlo is a suggested swap for early 50's GM trucks?

    Anyway, its probably not done too often, but you should have no trouble getting parts and stuff. Most of these cars are still on the road around here, so just geting replacements wouldn't be no trouble. And there is certainly an G-Body aftermarket.
     
  3. LUX BLUE
    Joined: May 23, 2005
    Posts: 4,407

    LUX BLUE
    Alliance Vendor
    from AUSTIN,TX

    shame it's only half the truck...Elky's are typically boxed.

    yes and no. the front end stuff is really well put together, and fairly narrow. problem is, the places you would use to mount to and weld to are funky shaped, so it would be a bit of a pain to stick it together. I have seen entire chassis swaps done, but I feel a bit "iffy" about a clip. (not to mention 87 wasn't exactly a "banner year" for steel quality from g.m. it fell off around 85 and got better in 94, but by then only the Impala was worth screwing with.) that said, if you find an a-body from 64 to 72, I have heard that the upper control arms,springs, and spindles are a pretty good disc brake swap (may be talking total shit,too- I haven't done that one myself.)

    it would work, but only the tape measure will tell you the whole story.
     
  4. Frosty21
    Joined: Jan 25, 2007
    Posts: 958

    Frosty21
    Member
    from KY

    Yeah, El Caminos got their own fairly unique chassis by '78. Still used G-Body parts though.

    And I didn't know GM's steel quality dropped off in '85, I know they did move to mexico by the early-mid 80's with the El Camino production.
     

  5. draggin ass
    Joined: Jun 17, 2005
    Posts: 1,920

    draggin ass
    BANNED
    from hell

  6. I would use the 'sub'frame, and have (an A body, 'bout the same).

    As far as the 'funky' weld areas, try this: cut the subframe rails at the corners, all four, both sides.
    Now peel the metal back like a banana.
    Slide the sub up OVER the rails you're welding it to.
    Bend the banana peels back, and you have a very large, very secure weld connection, and an easy mating as well.
    If the OEM rails are not boxed, do that beforehand. If they're very narrow, pie cut and spread, then box, then add subframe. I've done all this on different cars (and trucks) and it works nicely. Plus, A bodies are very cheap, and the subframe's dimensions are really very close for a lot of vehicles.

    P.S. Yes, one I did was a '53 Chevy truck. Worked very well.

    Cosmo
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.