Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Intake/carb question???

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Nos1partstore, Feb 18, 2020.

  1. Nos1partstore
    Joined: Jun 20, 2012
    Posts: 291

    Nos1partstore
    Member

    I put vintage speeds dual carb setup on my intake and it appears as though it doesn't completely cover part of it the intake manifold. Not to sound stupid here, but can i just make a thin metal spacer plate that covers this? can it be left uncovered? pictures attached. Thank you for the help
    Trevor Fitzpatrick
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,451

    Boneyard51
    Member

    That is an exhaust port! If you plugged the crossover in the intake it won’t make any difference, if not you will have an exhaust leak. I have drilled those and tapped them and screwed bolts in them with sealer and cut them off. If you do this, do both.






    Bones
     
    dirty old man likes this.
  3. Do the manifold carb stud holes line up with the adapter,or do you need a adapter plate under the carb adapter?It appears like the stud hole doesn't line up.
     
  4. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 6,953

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Actually, there is a stock part from GM that covers that. I had a '68 Corvette that was missing it (a shiny thin piece of metal, almost like a metal carb gasket), and it wouldn't run for shit until I put it back on.

    Speaking of "putting it back on", consider getting a Quadrajet if you have any interest in increased performance at all.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2020

  5. The dual carb adapter actually bolts down to the manifold?
    One would think it would be for a holley style carb..and not a quadrajet
     
    ClayMart and ted kovacs like this.
  6. southcross2631
    Joined: Jan 20, 2013
    Posts: 4,413

    southcross2631
    Member

    Don't matter if it fits or not .I always thought those things look cheesy . Spend extra money to make your car run slower ?
    A well built Q-jet would stomp the crap out of that setup. Not to mention be easier to tune.
    You dual carbs get a real dual carb manifold.
     
  7. Tickety Boo
    Joined: Feb 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,619

    Tickety Boo
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    To make it work you need a Q-jet to square bore adapter plate, Mr Gasket part #1932
    Without the adapter the carburetors won't even open all the way, butterfly's may hit the dividers on the cast intake:eek:
    There is one on E bay for $12.00 or new at Summit racing for $21.00

    The best way to run this would be with more open a square bore intake:rolleyes:

    You may also need to find a way for crankcase venting the rear of the block
    (Please don't drill those nice Corvette covers for breathers)
    I have had good results drilling and tapping the rear of intake manifolds for a 3/8 pipe thread to screw in a 5/8 hose nipple for venting the rear of the engine. Install a valley tray or make a oil deflector shield under the pipe fitting ;)
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2020
    loudbang likes this.
  8. There is no way that the butterfly's would hit with that tall spacer.. you thinking of just putting a holley carb on a Qjet manifold.

    But yes the OP should just run a Holley style manifold.


    Some just want a "LOOK" and not so much on the performance aspect..
     
  9. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,728

    carbking
    Member

    Your intake manifold is of the "spread-bore" type:

    http://www.thecarburetorshop.com/Four_barrel_mounting_flanges.htm

    While not a fan of the conversion you have even if you have the "square-bore" manifold; I don't believe it will work at all, even using a spread-bore to square-bore adapter with your current intake.

    Even the spread-bore to square-bore conversion is basically for the used-car salesman at Ssnake-oil Motors!

    Do the math. If you have a square-bore 750 CFM (AFB, Holley, clone, whatever), the primary side is 375, and the secondary side is also 375. That spread-bore manifold is designed for a Q-jet with 150 on the primary, and 600 on the secondary. So if the air transition from one to the other is perfect (it won't be) the maximum would be 150 on the primary, and 375 on the secondary. Your 750 CFM is now less than 525 CFM.

    Now adding the 2x2 conversion for even more volume loss, and I believe you will literally STARVE the front cylinders leading to engine failure!

    I understand wanting "the look"; but not at the expense of the blowing the engine.

    Suggestion: if you really want to use the 2x2 conversion for "the look", find an aftermarket, open plenum aluminum SQUARE-BORE intake for the engine. Then install the 2x2 conversion, if you wish.

    As far as performance, well, that is an entirely different story.

    Good luck, and please let us know how you proceed.

    Jon.
     
  10. I agree with everyone else, ditch the spread bore intake manifold and install a square bore. They are not that expensive. By the way, I like your dual carb conversion.
     
  11. Nos1partstore
    Joined: Jun 20, 2012
    Posts: 291

    Nos1partstore
    Member

    Jon,
    Are you referring to one of the Edelbrock performer rpm intakes like this?
    https://www.summitracing.com/parts/...MI_PmDv63b5wIVkB-tBh0EkwwYEAQYASABEgLkm_D_BwE
     
  12. Nos1partstore
    Joined: Jun 20, 2012
    Posts: 291

    Nos1partstore
    Member

    Do you mean a regular edelbrock performer rpm intake?
     
  13. Nos1partstore
    Joined: Jun 20, 2012
    Posts: 291

    Nos1partstore
    Member

    And, i forgot to mention this is the monster chevy 262 v8
     
  14. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,728

    carbking
    Member

    Actually, I was referring to one with a completely open (not divided) plenum. Not sure how the conversion will work with a divided plenum.

    Jon.
     
  15. Nos1partstore
    Joined: Jun 20, 2012
    Posts: 291

    Nos1partstore
    Member

  16. Nos1partstore
    Joined: Jun 20, 2012
    Posts: 291

    Nos1partstore
    Member

  17. Nos1partstore
    Joined: Jun 20, 2012
    Posts: 291

    Nos1partstore
    Member

    good point sir
     
  18. What I think you really need is a 1957-59 ish Chevy 4 barrel manifold.It has a square 4 hole pattern.There are some on Ebay to look at.Go to a parts store,and get a 57 4 barrel carb base gasket.It will tell you if your adaptor will bolt on.If the throttle shaft plates open all the way it should work.If not some sort of 1/4 to 3/8 inch tall spacer should make them clear.
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2020
    Blues4U likes this.
  19. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,075

    Beanscoot
    Member

    The mounting surface on your manifold (third picture) looks like it has a bunch of old crap such as gasket residue (or rust) under the paint.
    Hopefully the head mating surfaces aren't the same.
     
  20. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    Yeah, you don't need an aluminum aftermarket manifold, you just need a SBC cast iron manifold for a square bore carb. Look on eBay, you'll see lot's for sale there, though they're over priced IMO. I bought one a while back at a swap meet for $25.
     
  21. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,728

    carbking
    Member

    Just for the record, I was not intending to recommend aluminum, so much as an open plenum; and if an aluminum recommendation was implied, my apologies.

    Chevrolet may have made a cast iron open plenum manifold of which I am unaware.

    An original cast iron divide manifold, with the dividers milled away should be as good (or better) than an aftermarket aluminum manifold.

    Gasoline molecules mixed with air do not like corners. If one thinks of water flow in the bends of the river, where the current basically is forced against the far side of the curve one can understand this better. And the faster the water current (corresponding to higher RPM with increased runner velocity) the "smaller" (in effect) the runner becomes. There have been a number of flow diagrams of intake manifold runners that demonstrate this. Thus the more corners the adapter require, the unhappier the gasoline molecules.

    Jon.
     
  22. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 6,953

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    To add fuel to the fire, let me relate my experience. I attempted a project where I tried to run a QuadraJet (Spreadbore) carburetor on a flathead (I had a bunch of extra carbs and a Sharp 4BBL manifold I wasn't using, so I thought I'd take a shot at it). I used a Spreadbore to a regular Holley adapter modified to fit the Squarebore pattern of the manifold (are you following this?). To make a long story short, I couldn't get it to run worth a shit. I have given up on it (temporarily; I may get back to it someday). I think that you (like me and my experiment) have an agglomeration of parts that will never work together satisfactorily. I would listen to "carbking" on this.

    Here's the thread : https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/quadrajet-on-a-flathead-part-ii-implementation.1111638/
     
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2020
    The Shift Wizard likes this.
  23. Nos1partstore
    Joined: Jun 20, 2012
    Posts: 291

    Nos1partstore
    Member

  24. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 6,953

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That particular one may not be your best choice. First it needs a "Squarebore" carb or adapter, which may or may not be easy to find. Second, when the word "Corvette" shows up in an ad for Chevrolet parts the price goes out the window; especially with this seller, who is one of the biggest Corvette dealers around. When I look at the eBay listing, there is one down on the page ('66 Chevelle) that looks loke it would be a better choice. That one also seems to be grossly over-priced as well. Look at it this way : going to Swap Meets and looking for the parts you need is a lot of fun!:)

    If you haven't already done so, I would suggest following "cabrking"'s link and familiarize yourself with carburetor mounting bolt patterns. I know I was confused before I did.
     
  25. [​IMG] this may work instead of buying a new manifold. The 2x2 carb manifold is not intended for a Q-jet intake.
     
  26. Nos1partstore
    Joined: Jun 20, 2012
    Posts: 291

    Nos1partstore
    Member

    i think i am going to give this kit a try.
     

    Attached Files:

  27. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,451

    Boneyard51
    Member

    Changing the intake for one stock intake for the other, is a waste of time! Make sure you have clearance on all butterflies at WFO! I thought this and linkages problems were a give me!!!! We check this every time on our race car! Racing 101! Just my thinking!










    Bones
     
  28. Tickety Boo
    Joined: Feb 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,619

    Tickety Boo
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    o_O:confused: At minimum you need to go with a open plenum adapter, to help the air go around the corners.
    Note the difference between your kit and Ricks post #26, turn the plate in Ricks post upside down to make the spread bore adapt to the more open square bore.
     
    Last edited: Feb 19, 2020
  29. saltflats
    Joined: Aug 14, 2007
    Posts: 12,602

    saltflats
    Member
    from Missouri

    If you want to try one of those adapters send me your address, I can send you one to save you some money.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.