Register now to get rid of these ads!

In praise of the 4.11

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by PackardV8, Apr 11, 2012.

  1. PackardV8
    Joined: Jun 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,179

    PackardV8
    Member

    Just spent a weekend in Alabama with a friend who has a '36 Ford Tudor with a 283" and a '96 Chevy 2500 with a slightly built 350". Both have 4.11 rear gears.

    These days, with double-overdrive 6-speed automatics which shift down two gears at every little rise in the road, we sometimes forget the pleasure of driving a car/truck which is in it's happy spot in top gear. On the curvy two-lanes of rural Alabama, the ride was sweet, sweet, sweet. Never a need to downshift or even to touch the brakes. Just back off, listen to the pipes and it slows the necessary amount for tight curves.

    On the interstates, the engines were a bit more busy, noisy and thirsty, but felt relaxed and free-running; never a bit of strain. It was just good machinery going about it's business.

    We put his A-bone on a trailer behind the truck and never knew it was back there. Once up to speed, the Turbo 400 never shifted down, no matter what the hill. Yes, it was 12 MPG, but a stock 305" or 5.3 with all the overdrives won't do much better dragging that load and with the little engines fugeddabout passing when hauling heavy. His truck will yank by a slowbie without even thinking about it.

    Driving his in years past convinced me to gear up. Can't wait to get my custom Studes - a Hawk with a 4.09 and a Stude 3/4t with 4.10 back on the road and listen to them Packard V8 pipes. Definitely will sound even better than the SBC ;>)

    jack vines
     
  2. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    I have to agree that I dislike the multispeed automatics. 4.10/4.11s work best with a 4 speed overdrive auto and a 28" or taller tire. I run anywhere from 3.70 to 4.11 with an o/d slush. The 4.10/4.11 is not so good with non o/d trans on the Fwy - gets too noisy and fussy on trips....
     
  3. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,903

    need louvers ?
    Member

    Glad your happy, but I'm never again going to build a car with out an overdrive for western U.S. driving. As far as downshifting for every rise in the road, you just simply don't have enough power. Tell that to the guy in the mid ninties Corvette that tried to keep up with my Plymouth up the grade between El Centro and San Diego while I was running 85-90 in 5th...

    Also galvinized by a 2000 mile round trip in a friends '30 coupe (now "Hub cap's" here on the H.A.M.B.) to Texas with a 4:11 in the rear and a powerglide. Busy? How about a 283 "howling to the point of turning up the discman to 12 and hoping it stays together at 85", all while trying to keep up with ElPolacko before the twin turbos.

    Then there was the LARS trip with my buddy Ron Olmstead in his '35 phaeton with 4.11s... Nothing like doing 65mph screaming in the right lane while every other car on the planet slides by effortlessly going 85 - 100 in the left. Absolutely great for the hot rodder image.

    Oh, and you mentioned the fuel consumption. Did I mention my Plymouth has turned back a high of 19mpg with aprox 420hp? Ya, can't imagine why anybody would want a 5 or 6 speed... Damn new fangled things!
     
  4. deto
    Joined: Jun 26, 2010
    Posts: 2,620

    deto
    Member

    I get both arguments... But man for just local driving 411s are pretty rad... Until you wanna keep up on the freeway
     

  5. PackardV8
    Joined: Jun 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,179

    PackardV8
    Member

    Valid points all. Thoughts:

    1. Goes without saying, 4.11 are for tall tires only. Both these rigs have 16" - the truck runs 235/85-16.

    2. If for trips of more than 100 highway miles at a time, then yes for the overdrive. Turning 3,600- 4,000 at 80 MPH gets a bit noisy on a long run.
    3. Rodding is about doing it your way. Some are willing to go period-correct and live with the compromises. Some want the look with modern power and economy. Your build, your money, your decision. My friend is in Alabama, with a lot of miles of curvy two-lane back roads where as I said, the 4.11s are a natural. I'm out west in Spokane, between the ass-cheeks of nowhere, so I admit I cheated on both my Studebaker builds and they have overdrive manual transmissions. But I still get the off-the-line goodness of the 4.11s.

    4. GM now puts 3.42 rear gears in their pickups with the 6-speed double-overdrive automatic. And yes even though they are LS V8 powered, they downshift at every rise in the road.

    jack vines
     
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2012
  6. mike hohnstein
    Joined: Dec 4, 2011
    Posts: 262

    mike hohnstein
    BANNED
    from wisconsin

    Back in the day when 3 sp overdrives were the shit 4.11 was standard gear, still is as far as I'm concerned, when using an overdrive trans, stick or automatic.
     
  7. I'll second that
     
  8. My c10 had a 700r4 with 29 inch tall tires and 4:10 gears - it was perfect. My current project has a 4 spd saginaw with 32 inch tall tires ( may go smaller) and 3:73 gears. I got my fingers crossed as far as this combo being workable.
     
  9. you'll be fine! I've got 4 speed, 3:80's and 29.5" tall tires and at 3000 RPM I think I am right at 70 MPH. It works and really gets up and goes when you lean on her.
     
  10. I had 4.11s in my OT '68 Stang, really quite a good gear to keep the revs reasonable and plenty of gas pedal punch when needed. I did run taller tires to give it longer legs.

    My double-secret OT import also has the same gear with the 4 speed OD. Out of OD, it is nice to drive on steep grades.

    Bob
     
  11. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,483

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    How about this? Doug Nash 4+1 with 3.07 rear. 5th is straight through, but 1st is equivelent to 4.09 rear with wide ratio 4 speed. The other 3 gears have an equivalent of about 4.0 to 3.9. I probably won't get to try it out for another year.
     
  12. k9racer
    Joined: Jan 20, 2003
    Posts: 3,091

    k9racer
    Member

    2 car that I have owned with OD trans and low factory installed rear gears. First was a 53 ford it had a 4.26 ratio. The other was a 53 Studebaker factory V8 with OD trans it had a 4.56 gear.. Never had the following but Kiasers came with 4,56..51 Merc had 4.11 and 4.26 gears also. Pre war olds had a 4.30 gear.
     
  13. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    4.56s with 28" dot's in my old street car, my Chevy II is getting 4.11's with a 26" tall tire and a 200R4, I call that having your cake and eating it, but the OD is just icing, if I was putting a T350 in, I'd still keep the 4.11s. Actually looking at building a cheap O/T shop truck, I was looking at 3.73s or 4.11s with 26" tires & a T350 for that as well. 3.08s belong in your moms car...
     
  14. 1950 silver bullet
    Joined: May 11, 2011
    Posts: 176

    1950 silver bullet
    Member
    from Austin, TX

    yes 3.08's do. my mom's chevy II ran 11.07 @ 130 mph with 3.08's a muncie 4 speed and a 26 tall 7 inch wides. it would pull 115 mph in third gear. ITS ALL ABOUT THE COMBINATION !!!
     
  15. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    11.07@130 eh? So what you have there is a low ten second car that is running a second slower than it should due to the wrong rear gear. Yes, like you said, its all about the combination.
     
  16. 1950 silver bullet
    Joined: May 11, 2011
    Posts: 176

    1950 silver bullet
    Member
    from Austin, TX

    it's a street car !!! if it wasnt it would be running 9's
     
  17. wheeltramp brian
    Joined: Jun 11, 2010
    Posts: 2,608

    wheeltramp brian
    Member

    got a 55 poncho 287with a 53 ford 3 speed w/od and 57' 9" with 4.11 gears with posi and 750 16 tires in rear in my 29 roadster.perfect around town and perfect on the freeways.did 80@2500 rpm to vegas and back
     
  18. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    So was the car in the pm i sent you. Dots, mufflers, and regularly street driven.
     
  19. combo? how about a 327 with a 283 crank [big bore short stroke] 4.56 3 speed manual. don't need a radio [wouldn't hear it anyway] just listen to the motor scream.
     
  20. Funny how I can remember me and my buddies switching over to 5.13's in the summer ( early 10 bolts ) for a couple weeks. 30 A, 34 Coupe and 32 truck all 4 speed and small blocks. Had to shift really fast and gas was 50 cents but what a rush. Now a days overdrive in everything I build but still at least 3.73 in the ass end,.
     
  21. mbstude
    Joined: Oct 6, 2007
    Posts: 180

    mbstude
    Member

    Jack V., as you already know, my newly purchased Stude 3/4 ton has the big six with OD and a 4.11. I can't wait to see how it drives around town and on the highway.

    Also, shame on you for being in Aladamnbama and not letting me know. I would've driven over, shook your hand and bought you dinner.
     
  22. 1950 silver bullet
    Joined: May 11, 2011
    Posts: 176

    1950 silver bullet
    Member
    from Austin, TX

    sweet !!!
     
  23. Road Runner
    Joined: Feb 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,256

    Road Runner
    Member

    I drove a 4.11 for many years every single day in every day traffic, but with my early inline 6s a 3.55 or similar ratio without overdrive is as simple, easy or 'sweet' as it gets.

    With that ratio you stay about 90% in the same high gear, with lower end torque pulling uphill like a train and at higher rpm, without shifting, reaching highest mileage at 65-70mph on the freeways.

    Talking about simple: 3-on-the-tree without overdrive or automatic gets my praise, whatever rear ratio that matches your car and engine.
     
  24. A23
    Joined: May 15, 2010
    Posts: 120

    A23
    Member
    from Hollywood

    Gear for the cam.
     
  25. Dyce
    Joined: Sep 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,973

    Dyce
    Member

    I had 4.11 gears in my first 40 Chevy. I'd set the tach at 4,000 rpm for 72 mph. Knocked over some good gas milage. It was perfect, I had 2x4's with a progresive linkage and at the 4000 rpm it was bumped up to the secondarys so I was running off the primarys. Wife didn't like the noise though...
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.