Register now to get rid of these ads!

hemi - crankshaft rear main seal surface ??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 30dodgeboy, Dec 27, 2005.

  1. Can anyone supply a pic of what the rear main seal surface should look like on an early hemi? I've got a (marine) crank with a pitted rear main seal surface, yet the rest looks absolutely perfect. I see no evidence of the helical knurling I would expect to see. Hmmm. Did they not do that on the marine/truck cranks? Is the part number the same for LH and RH cranks?
     
  2. QQMOON
    Joined: Oct 7, 2002
    Posts: 1,309

    QQMOON
    Member

    Dodge boy there will be no knurling if the crank is pitted just linish it up it will be fine
     
  3. HemiRambler
    Joined: Aug 26, 2005
    Posts: 4,208

    HemiRambler
    Member

    Here's a pic of a 392 crank - all I have are the same - no idea if they are all car or industrial or truck or ?

    I only assume that the crank part numbers for left or right rotation must be different. That's only a guess.

    I highlighted the knurls - they are quite faint.




     

    Attached Files:

  4. chitbox dodge
    Joined: Apr 25, 2005
    Posts: 598

    chitbox dodge
    Member
    from dunlap tn

    the knurls on the end of my desoto are way more defined than that. i guess mopar couldnt even get that consistent between makes.
     

  5. Bugman
    Joined: Nov 17, 2001
    Posts: 3,483

    Bugman
    Member

    My 392 knurling is reasonably pronounced. I'll see of I can get a pic in the next few days.
     
  6. Gotgas
    Joined: Jul 22, 2004
    Posts: 7,176

    Gotgas
    Member
    from DFW USA

    I'm pretty sure that every early Hemi came with a knurled crank. Has it already been turned down?

    There is no difference in the LH and RH cranks, only the cam is different for reverse rotation.

    All 392s were passenger car engines.

    And there is nothing consistent between Chrysler, DeSoto, and Dodge Hemis. hahhahahaaaa
     
  7. HemiRambler
    Joined: Aug 26, 2005
    Posts: 4,208

    HemiRambler
    Member

    Not that I am doubting you (because I don't know for certain), but would the knurl be the wrong driection for a crank rotating the opposite direction???

    Almost nothing!!! On my "nostalgic" cars where I am using a stock water pump - I found out that I could rebuild my 392 pumps using the guts out of some other Mopar (hemi) motors. The impeller is the same on SOME - as is the shaft, bearing and seal.:D
     
  8. 2manybillz
    Joined: May 30, 2005
    Posts: 835

    2manybillz
    Member

    I'd check the size if the knurl is gone, it doesn't take a whole lot of polishing with a 180 grit belt to remove it. If you run a rope seal, the size isn't as critical, for a neoprene one it is. The seal area on a steel crank can be built up if necessary, the knurling can be redone also but if it was mine I wouldn't worry about the knurling, size matters more. I'm on vacation, can't access the seal size 'till next tuesday.
     
  9. Gotgas
    Joined: Jul 22, 2004
    Posts: 7,176

    Gotgas
    Member
    from DFW USA

    Good point, I may be mistaken. But I have seen reverse-rotation marine engines converted to normal rotation with a cam swap only without any problems. I'll look into this..
    Yeah, I think there is also a timing cover that swaps between early Chryslers and all the DeSotos, but that's about it. :D
     
  10. 2manybillz
    Joined: May 30, 2005
    Posts: 835

    2manybillz
    Member

     
  11. bulletproof1
    Joined: Feb 23, 2004
    Posts: 2,079

    bulletproof1
    Member
    from tulsa okla

    thats a good point 2many...also wouldnt you have to change the gear on the dizzy?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.