Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Helix corner killer suspension

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Rotndawg, Sep 22, 2015.

  1. Rotndawg
    Joined: Sep 22, 2015
    Posts: 1

    Rotndawg
    Member

    Im one of the suckers that bought the corner killer kit for my 56 f100, there is almost no front suspension travel, my coilovers look nothing like the ones they advertise even after upgrading to the heavier springs the coils have almost no gap. I try to avoid any uneven roadways and now I see one of my lower balljoint is either pulling out of the control arm or backing out and it seems to have excessive movement in all the joints loaded or unloaded. Im wandering should I suck it up and remove this chinese made crap and go with another kit or try to repair it.
    Any input would be greatly appreciated.
     
  2. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,046

    Ned Ludd
    Member

    Sounds like the spring rates are all wrong for your application. I'm not familiar with the kit: do you tell them what spring rates you want?

    A quick look at the Helix website reveals that this is part of the dreaded Hoffman Group (apparently renamed: the info was well enough hidden. It seems they're running out of victims who are unfamiliar with the name.) In light of that I'd take a look at the assortment of individual parts you've got and see if there is something else you can use them for, e.g. hood hinges, seat springs, paperweights, etc.
     
    lowcoe likes this.
  3. Given the questionable quality of ANYTHING Hoffman, why would you even want to repair it? Or trust the integrity of any of it? I say move on or else the corner killer may kill more than corners.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  4. pitman
    Joined: May 14, 2006
    Posts: 5,148

    pitman

    Rotten; you might search out the Hoffman threads.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.

  5. Ford used an exceptional axle under those old trucks, they were stout and simple.

    Send it back for a refund if no refund available call an attorney and any consumer advocacy groups and or attorneys general that will listen.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  6. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,695

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

    Why does this sort of thing continue to happen? And to what agencies can complaints be made that will put the Hoffman group out of business for good? Maybe while the President of China is here in Everett, Wa. today touring the Boeing plant, someone can ask him about this garbage being shipped over here. But, I guess he's only here to buy airplanes, that will not have any Hoffman group parts in them,. I am Butch/56sedandelivery.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  7. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 31,231

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    "rough" situation - how long ago did you buy/install set up? in the long run will likely be best to replace with another well researched set up
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  8. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,462

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Replace the whole works with something better and proven.
    It's a hard lesson but one day people will learn not to buy that Helix-Hoffman trash.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  9. olscrounger
    Joined: Feb 23, 2008
    Posts: 4,774

    olscrounger
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    looked at a car with one. I prefer axles but was looking anyway-didn't look too great and rode/handled worse.
     
  10. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,316

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Why don't people research their purchases before they make them.

    DO NOT drive this truck until this has been rectified. It is NOT SAFE.

    Take it all out, and return it.

    It is not a corner killer kit, it is a driver and innocent bystander killer kit.
     
  11. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    Nothing new in any of this. My barber had a few philosophical signs in his shop 50 years ago....
    one of which said "there is no product some man cannot figure how to make cheaper and sell for less.....those who consider price only are his lawful prey". That saying was probably hundreds of years old then.

    Put in a more succinct and familiar way...."you get what you pay for".....at best, I'd say....and maybe less.

    Ray
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2015
  12. ago
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 2,199

    ago
    Member
    from pgh. pa.

    Is anything usable? Is it independent? If the lower control arms are level, consider raising the upper coil over mounts to get more travel. The shocks should never bottom out before something else (bump stops) hit the frame first.
     
  13. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 2,953

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    For your F100,
    There is an easy way to fix the Suspension travel , Ride quality, Brakes, Ackermann, Power Rack, all with a proven quality parts already set up for you................
    Install a Crown Vic front end ,and be done with all these Gee Whizz kits that try and re-invent the wheel.

    Do it once ,then spend your time putting miles on that truck.

    F100 Crown Vic.jpg
     
    bct likes this.
  14. Canuck
    Joined: Jan 4, 2002
    Posts: 1,104

    Canuck
    Member

    Give DW or Paul at Welder Series a call and see what they can do for you. Check out their web site. They make a good product and know what they are talking about. And Canadian to boot.
     
  15. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,316

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    No. Nothing in these kits is of any quality. I put one of their control arms through a bandsaw, and found uneven wall thickness, seamed tubing, which appeared to be non-structural pipe.

    In a MII system, the shocks are the bump-stops.

    I cannot right off remember if the Crown Vic suspension is the correct width for this year F100, but, if it is, it is a highly-logical solution, for not a lot of scratch.
     
    WelderSeries likes this.
  16. :D :D :D
     
  17. 117harv
    Joined: Nov 12, 2009
    Posts: 6,589

    117harv
    Member

    Had the OP used the internet to do a search on the company, then he wouldn't have had to use the internet to find a forum to seek help for an off topic subject.


    5. As mentioned throughout these guidelines, the H.A.M.B. focuses on TRADITIONAL hot rods and customs. Posts pertaining to traditionally inspired, but not quite period perfect belong on the main forum found here. Please note that we don't focus on things such as modern fuel injected motors, big-inch wheels, frame clips, after market independent suspensions, etc... at all on the H.A.M.B.. As such, posts that stray away from the "traditional inspired" will be deleted.

    From the rules sticky ^^^
     
  18. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 2,953

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    Here's a tutorial



    We have to decide whether taking risks is more traditional than safety of all concerned
     
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2015
  19. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,316

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Crown Vic suspension is not aftermarket, nor is it a frame clip. :p

    Boss man can delete any thread any time he likes. He would be busy, though, were he to hold fast to these rules.
     
    Hnstray likes this.
  20. Firecat7
    Joined: Dec 11, 2011
    Posts: 269

    Firecat7
    Member

    can you post some pix of the ball joint n arm, and of the coil spring. sounds like the spring rate is way weak(thus coil bind-thus driving the ball joint out). do the joints press in or screw in? Don't give up yet. call if you like. I'm a shop in Maine , have fabricated my own I.F.S. systems . Maybe I can lead you in a direction to repair. 207-712-8585
     
  21. bchctybob
    Joined: Sep 18, 2011
    Posts: 5,244

    bchctybob
    Member

    Butch asked, "Why does this sort of thing continue to happen?" It's the slick ads in the mainstream magazines that suck most people in. I have to admit I've been tempted by the ads and prices but I'm way too cheap to dive in. My F-100 still has the good ol' dropped axle I've been swearing I'd replace for years. Hard to beat simple.
    If I were you, I'd replace all that crap with something else. You're messing with car (truck) control here and there's nothing more important for yourself and others. A lot of rodders redo their chassis stuff several times just 'cause they can't make up their minds - at least you have a good excuse.
    I've heard (not verified) that the Crown Vic front end stuff is a little too wide for the 53-56 F-100s?? If that's true, that's too offensive to my eye, like a too narrow rear end or wheels/tires not centered in the fender openings. Anyone put a tape measure to one?
     
  22. There on e bay also.
     
  23. willymakeit
    Joined: Apr 13, 2009
    Posts: 1,326

    willymakeit
    Member

    Heard the same about the CV being to wide. I ended up using a 57 axle with down /forward springs with reversed eyes in front. Relocated and flipped rear spring hangers with extended shackle for rear. I wanted to be able to get the bumper over the sidewalk.
     
  24. ago
    Joined: Oct 12, 2005
    Posts: 2,199

    ago
    Member
    from pgh. pa.

    I don't know about F 100 trucks. But I know of people that put the front K member and torsion suspension out of Mopar Cordoba, on fat fender ed Fords. It rode much better than MII.
     
  25. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,316

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have not only heard that, but driven them, and a few AD trucks with the same. None of them rode well.

    Maybe my standards are too high.
     
  26. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    That is soooooo 1980's :D

    My brother had a '56 F-100 with that suspension system. It was 'ok'...sort of...but he opted for one of El Polackos custom crossmembers that uses 1st generation Dakota suspensions bits.

    As for the 2003 up Crown Vic/Merc Marquis front end. Hub to hub it is about 65". The wheels are like front wheel drive style, with deep backspacing and 17" to 18" diameter. The deep backspacing does bring the wheels inward, but the geometry precludes using more common/popular hot rod wheels.

    The integrated crossmember/suspension is very appealing for a swap due to the relative simplicity of adapting it to a ladder frame. But, "all that glitters is not gold".

    Ray
     
  27. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,943

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The rub with the Crown Vic front ends is that you are pretty well limited to factory Crown Vic wheels or aftermarket wheels that look like front wheel drive rims. That is unless you wan that 80's 4x4 look with the tires half way out of the fenders.
    I bit off on a crossmember and A frames that are Helix from Welder Joe on Ebay and as every one else says the work is beyond suspect.
    Welds on the crossmember ground through
    [​IMG]

    Sloppy welds
    [​IMG]

    More sloppy welds and crude construction
    [​IMG]

    That setup isn't going on the 48 as I am running a Jag front end but after my son reworks it it will probably go under a little 1200 or less lb 4 banger OT roadster after a ball joint change.
     
  28. Ignore all the previous suggestions and get with ElPolacko for one of his PROVEN Dakota based kits. I am putting one in my GMC and the workmanship is better than ANYTHING out there.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  29. mr.chevrolet
    Joined: Jul 19, 2006
    Posts: 8,875

    mr.chevrolet
    Member

    Jag, front & rear
     
    Oldb and 2racer like this.
  30. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,462

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    Stuck in the 70's are we ? :D
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.