Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Front radius rod set up

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by LSJUNIPER, Oct 17, 2016.

  1. christmas tree
    Joined: Dec 7, 2009
    Posts: 347

    christmas tree
    Member

    With a beam axle correct caster 7-8 degrees 1/16 inch to1/8 tow inn and correct tire pressure All this learned the hard way.
     
    1930 turbo likes this.
  2. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,378

    evintho
    Member

    Not to hijack but currently I have about 13 degrees of caster in my front end. Can I get away with that? What problems would that cause?
     
  3. You could easily take up the front bolts for more thread engagement and let the rears out some to keep things even. That is assuming the threaded shanks are the same.



    image.jpeg
    image.jpeg

    It's really important to verify the frame is square before using its dimensions for guidance.
    You can still get the axles square to the road even if the frame is like a banana.
    The lower pic demonstrates equidistant measurements side to side on a out of square frame.
    image.jpeg
     
    4ever18 and 29AVEE8 like this.
  4. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    I will double check the frame for square. Also may have to use a different bracket at the back of the radius rod to allow more thread engagement at the front (adjustment). Thanks all for your comments
     
  5. This song comes to mind. :D



    Lost of caster makes one real sluggish and enough will make it scoot the front tires. Look at videos of old diggers turning. The tires are leaning more than turning. Works good on a road bike real stable at speed but you lean a bike something you can't do with a car. Of course I am using extremes hereto make a point.

    @31Vicky with a hemi I like the idea of hairpins because you can fine tune them a little bit. Nothing radical but if you miss it a little bit on your build you have a little leeway.
     
    4ever18 and Atwater Mike like this.
  6. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Double checked the frame for square and its good. Re-adjusted the threaded clevis for 1-1/2 times thread engagement.
    The bracket is about 1/2" from the frame. See pic to reference bracket. not sure what to do from here. Any help will be appreciated. Thanks


    [​IMG]
     
  7. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Maybe a longer bracket or see pic below?

    upload_2017-2-21_12-3-48.jpeg
     
  8. so can you cut an inch off the upper bar on the hairpin? make sure it is threaded deep enough.
     
  9. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Sounds like a good idea....Will check into it....

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2017
  10. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    4ever18 likes this.
  11. At the front, the Clevis' do Not have to have the same amount of thread engagement top and bottom. You can adjust the lower one longer and upper shorter to bring the rear of the hairpins up closer to the frame (and vice verse) as long as you still keep the 1 1/2 times diameter rule in play.
     
  12. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Yes I did adjust it like you quoted but I only had less then a 1/2" of thread engagement. Thanks
     
  13. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Blues4U, Got a pic of the set up just to make sure I understand?? thanks
     
  14. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    20161111_134307b.jpg
     
  15. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

  16. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Made progress this weekend thanks to the help from the HAMB.
     
  17. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Made progress this weekend thanks to the help from the HAMB.
     

    Attached Files:

  18. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Now on to the rear axle. I plan on putting this banjo rear in. How should I tackle this one???
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 6, 2017
  19. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    ??
     
  20. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    This is going to be a torque tube installation, or open drive?
     
  21. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    I want to go with the open drive install. Thinking of sending the rear to Hot Rod Works for the conversion.
     
  22. Ken Smith
    Joined: Dec 6, 2005
    Posts: 420

    Ken Smith
    Alliance Vendor

    The open driveshaft conversion is a bolt on kit. You can do that at your place. If you want to upgrade the axles to a modern slide in style, there is machine work involved. You can either send the parts to us for machining, or we can send the parts to you and you can have a local shop do the machine work. We also can do everything at our shop: set up and assemble and blueprint the complete rear end if you want to send it to us.
    Either way, we are happy to do whatever you'd like.
     
    4ever18 and Blues4U like this.
  23. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Thank you, will be contacting you.
     
  24. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    What is a typical steel wheel size used for a project like this?
     
  25. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    So what are your plans? Split wishbones? Ladder bars? Hairpins?
     
  26. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    Going with radius rods in the front, want to use a banjo rear, not sure what to use on that... I am a newb when it comes to all this... on a big learning curb right now . Got this pic on google images
    upload_2017-3-20_11-54-16.png
     

    Attached Files:

  27. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    There are several books out there on "How To" build a hot rod, they would probably be a good investment for you.

    Also, there are a lot of threads here on the HAMB that discuss radius rods, ladder bars, 4 links, etc. Spend some time searching for those threads and reading them, there is a lot of good info available.

    Basically, since you're converting to open drive, you need something to locate the axle in place that will allow full movement thru the range of suspension travel without binding while keeping the axle centered in the chassis and handle the rotational torque stresses that will be applied when you accelerate.

    Old school traditionalists will split the wishbones and mount the leading ends to the outside of the frame rails, and use a panhard bar to keep it centered. But many will tell you that the wishbones are not strong enough by themselves to deal with the torque stress, and will eventually fail. Again, do a search and look how others have dealt with that, certain wishbones are stronger/weaker than others. Mounting the leading end inside the rails, as close to the original position will help, but is not a cure. Some guys like to weld braces onto them to increase the strength and relieve some of the stress off the weakest parts.

    For a Model A you could go with hair pin rear radius rods, which are still very traditional. About the easiest installation too. Rear hairpins need to have additional bracing added between upper/lower arms to help deal with torque stress. These are probably best used with lower horsepower engines, flat heads Fords and small block OHV's that are not built to the hilt. Too much torque stress can twist them if you're too heavy on the throttle/clutch. You'll still need a panhard bar to keep the axle centered.

    Then you have ladder bars, which are a stronger form of radius rods, mounted inboard of the rails, that were really developed for drag racing. For serious HP applications this may be the way to go.

    Then there are plenty of guys out there, and don't be surprised to see them jump in here, that will swear up and down that neither split bones nor hair pins nor ladder bars are any good, because they don't allow for rotation of the axle as it moves through the range of travel. This makes the axle work like a huge anti-sway (anti-roll) bar. They say that causes poor handling and rough ride (binding). For these guys, 4 bar is the only way to go. Triangulate them and you do away with the need for a panhard bar. But this increases the complexity of installation, and I'm sure they are technically best, but IMO not so traditional.

    That's a real brief summary of your choices. Like I said a couple of times above, spend some time researching. Get yourself a tall soda or a cup of coffee, whichever you prefer, and sit down and goole all of those terms and read everything you can. You'll have to wade through a lot of opinions and decipher which is real and which is imaginary, and which applies to your project and which doesn't. But the time spent will be well worth it.

    FWIW, In my Model A pickup I have front and rear hairpins, and I'm quite happy with the way it rides and handles. In hard turns it remains very flat and stable and it corners very well (for a 87 year old car with flexi flyer chassis and about 3 inches of suspension travel and skinny bias ply tires). It's a blast to drive through the twisties, and I think I could stick with about most hot rods through the tight stuff. So for those that say they cause the car to handle poorly, not IME. But it's a light weight car with low HP 283 Chevy, not a lot of weight or torque to deal with. In a bigger heavier car with more torque I'd probably do something else.

    Hope that helps.

    Next, what about the rear spring? Buggy spring or coil overs?
     
  28. Blues4U
    Joined: Oct 1, 2015
    Posts: 7,589

    Blues4U
    Member
    from So Cal

    Picture in the OP shows an I-beam axle. I'm assuming that's what he's going with. I didn't see a tube axle posted.
     
  29. LSJUNIPER
    Joined: Aug 17, 2010
    Posts: 243

    LSJUNIPER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from ct

    I have an I-Beam axle.
     
  30. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    Sorry, Confused!
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2017
    LSJUNIPER likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.