Register now to get rid of these ads!

Front panard bar

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by HOTRODPRIMER, Dec 28, 2003.

  1. The mor-dor and the roadster have been on the road a number of years....and in all this time i have never had a panard bar nor driven a car with one.....so I don't have any preconceived knowledge on the subject.

    The mor-dor has a 4 inch dropped axle,16 " Kelseys and tall skinny ass tires....700 x 16 and 600 x 16 .

    The roadster has a 4 inch drop also,,wheel's 15 inch 8's and 6's with big and little radials.

    I know the addition of the panard bars would make a difference in handling.

    I'd like to know if you are running one?,,,,and why you decided to use or add one?......HRP

     
  2. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    A panhard bar makes the steering more precise. The whole axle can move from side to side when steering and that changes the angle of the wheels. Makes turning a little funny in that the car will move relative to the axle and you have to compensate for this in the turn and coming out of the turn. I prefer using a dead perch in that it is less stuff under the car and it simpler.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    My picture was a little smass. I'll try again. I have engineering drawings for this if anyone wants them.
     

    Attached Files:

  4. If your running a side steer setup,you might not notice too much difference,
    especially with the tall sidewalls.
    I suspect the difference is more noticable with cross steering,the axle moving side to side relative to the chassis would cause the wheels to turn slightly without driver input.
     

  5. thirtytwo
    Joined: Dec 19, 2003
    Posts: 2,639

    thirtytwo
    Member

    right now all my cars and the cars i build have stock style steering with f-1 boxes, you dont need it ...i drove one car with cross-steer and no pan-hard it was scary and unpredictable, i heard one company say "if its set up right you don't need it on cross steer" either...i think its BS anything with cross-steer and a transverse spring should have a panhard- my opinion for what its worth... im sorry i just noticed the pic of the dead perch..never had experience with one but is supposed to eliminate the need for panhard, dont see why that wouldnt work either, i like the idea of a panhard and two shacles a little better though
     
  6. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    The mor door probably has the side steering set up and won't need it. If the roadster has a Vega cross steer, the panhard bar or dead perch will prevent any side to side axle movement caused by the drag link pushing and pulling on the right side spindle.
     
  7. [ QUOTE ]
    A panhard bar makes the steering more precise. Makes turning a little funny in that the car will move relative to the axle and you have to compensate for this in the turn and coming out of the turn.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    On the mor-door,,,,I blamed the tall skin tires for that sudden ...HURRY AND CATCH UP on my coming out of a turn.

    HRP
     
  8. [ QUOTE ]
    The mor door probably has the side steering set up and won't need it. If the roadster has a Vega cross steer, the panhard bar or dead perch will prevent any side to side axle movement caused by the drag link pushing and pulling on the right side spindle.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    The mor-door and the roadster both have cross steering..

    The mor-door has early mustang and the roadster has vega.
    HRP
     
  9. AnimalAin
    Joined: Jul 20, 2002
    Posts: 3,416

    AnimalAin
    Member

    My coupe has a four bar and dropped axle up front. Steering was greatly improved when we installed the panhard bar. Keep in mind that longer is better, and if you can match the length of the steering rod it is probably not a bad thing.
     
  10. Andy, I would like to see the drawings HRP
     
  11. cross spring
    Joined: Nov 17, 2003
    Posts: 112

    cross spring
    Member

    hi hrd
    ran my coupe without p.rod for 2 years it has drop tube n 4 bar set up with side steer it used to wander in truck rutts on the motorway fitted p.rod 3yrs ago its made the car feel mutch tighter n i can throw it round corners abit more,seems to have stopped it wandering in truck rutts to ,just one question do your rods run split bonesor sutch upfront,or or they still as henry intendid?
     
  12. I have a 4 bar set-up on both cars,,,,ford truck drums on the mor-dor and disc brakes on the roadster. HRP
     

    Attached Files:

  13. Deuce Roadster
    Joined: Sep 8, 2002
    Posts: 9,519

    Deuce Roadster
    Member Emeritus

    [​IMG]


    I have a panhard bar on the 32........and you have driven it....haven't you ? I know MRS HRP has.........



    If not...I can fix that........


    [​IMG]
     
  14. Funny thing as right this moment I am finishing my front bar. IMO, I think that you need to control the movement of particular pieces. The axle should go up and down (tube axle), not side to side. Point in fact......

    I-beams twist, I don't know if you need one there. On an I-beam, I think a dampener would be better..

    Dis be my two pennies.............
     
  15. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,757

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    HRP do you have any pictures of the early mustang cross steering? sounds interesting.
     
  16. Yeah,Deuce...mrs. HRP did drive your roadster [​IMG] I didn't..
    I turned out the way the two of you planned didn't it... can you spell...CONSPIRANCY! [​IMG]...thanks

    Tommy,right now i don't havre a picture but i'll try to take a photo tomorrow...this car has a lotta old style parts ...back when they were new! [​IMG] HRP
     
  17. Deuce Roadster
    Joined: Sep 8, 2002
    Posts: 9,519

    Deuce Roadster
    Member Emeritus

    [ QUOTE ]
    Yeah,Deuce...mrs. HRP did drive your roadster [​IMG] I didn't..


    [/ QUOTE ]

    I can chaange that..........come on down and get the keys..........


    [​IMG]
     
  18. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    Don't know what will be shown but this is the drawing. I could mail you the full size version if interested. I made the one from 1"plate and 1" bar
     

    Attached Files:

  19. cross spring
    Joined: Nov 17, 2003
    Posts: 112

    cross spring
    Member

    cool rod hrp
    could do with that rod for the family{thats why im buildin the A}only asked the question cause im not to sure but i think unsplit bones dont need one{proberbly talkin bs.}
    do you run 4 bar out back,i do on my b ,front+back got p.rod on both,and as the actress said to the bishop length is every thing regards keith [​IMG]
     
  20. burger
    Joined: Sep 19, 2002
    Posts: 2,372

    burger
    Member


    Andy,

    Could you explain this whole "dead perch" thing a little bit more? This is a new one to me, so a little 'splainin would help clear things up.



    Thanks,
    Ed

     
  21. Andy
    Joined: Nov 17, 2002
    Posts: 5,121

    Andy
    Member

    A dead perch was what was used on all the old solid axle race cars. If you go to the sprint car museum at Knoxville or the Inde. museum, you will see dead perches everywhere.No panhard bars.It works by using half of the spring as a panhard bar. The shackle on the drivers side is removed and a fixed mount for the end of the spring is substituted. Because of the stiffness and the strength of the spring this works extreamly well. The panhard bar design takes up room and can interfear with the drag link.I don't like to see the extra stuff either. I think the dead perch is a cleaner looking design. I've got all my friends using them and every one likes them.
     
  22. BLAKE
    Joined: Aug 10, 2002
    Posts: 2,783

    BLAKE
    Member

    Here's mine...

     

    Attached Files:

  23. I run one. It makes a noticable differance if you have cross stearing. Spring width will make some difference too. The more upright your shackles are at ride height the axel will have a tendensy to "swing" on the perches. Thats what the "Deadperch" was designed for, to take the back and forth movement out. But If the spring is shorter and the shackles are pointing more inboard it won't move back and forth nearly as much. I saw this setup recently on a pro built chassis and was told it works surprizingly well.

    I had a old hotrod a years ago and it didn't have one and it had cross stearing using a 40 ford box, and I could tell it would move back and forth by the stearing not always being in the same position when going straight.



     
  24. flynj1
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 583

    flynj1
    Member
    from C.B. IOWA

    A dead perch is a much cleaner look and worked well in race cars but dont forget about the up and down force put on the tire in cornering from a dead perch or panhard . A panhard ran level will put only side force to the tires in a turn, no up or down loading and = in left or right turn. Runing a panhard higher on one side will load or unload the tires opeset depending on wich whay you turn. Thats why you here them talk obout adjusting track bar in Nascar. A dead perch is like a short panhard mounted much higher one frame then axel so handels diffrent in left and right turns. A dead perch also is not good for bump steer on cross steer because of the dif.in lengh and angal to the steering rod. On a cross steer car if you run a panhard AND stearing rod the same lengh and level you will have the best and = handeling in left and right turns. On a side steer car a panhard is not as importent put works best with a long and level panhard and for the least bump steer the steering rod and wish bone should be the same lengh and paralel.On a side steer the main reason for going to a long panhard verses short in to minimize the side to side movement as the car goes over bumps Sorry about the bad spelling Im not to good at this but hope this helps
     
  25. flynj1
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 583

    flynj1
    Member
    from C.B. IOWA

    I dont want it to sound like I am totaly agenst a dead pearch because Im not. Right now I am building a 30 roadster as a late 40s dirt track roadster. I will drive it mostly on the street but will run it on dirt track 3 or 4 times a year. On this car I will run a dead pearch because it will work good on the track. A D.P. works good on a roundy rounder because when you throw it in the corner most of the weight goes to the right frount. With a D.P all the right side of the spring still works because its the side with the shackle. The left side is anouther story. with no shackle it has a tendensey to just bind up lift the tire.No big deal in a hard left turn but if you got to make a hard right you got your hands full with the left side of the spring binding. This is no big deal just runing around on the street but in a panic trying to keep out of a wreck it could be.
     
  26. Post deleted by HOTRODPRIMER
     
  27. Post deleted by HOTRODPRIMER
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.