Register now to get rid of these ads!

Dynamat vs Eastwood Thermo-coustic

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by NorCal51Merc, Aug 29, 2012.

  1. NorCal51Merc
    Joined: Jul 31, 2012
    Posts: 21

    NorCal51Merc
    Member

    Anyone have experience using either of these products on the floors of your cars?

    Which one is preferred?

    Is there a valid reason for the Dynamat product costing twice as much?

    I'll be using one or the other on the freshly treated floors of my '51 Merc as a heat and sound barrier followed by the Dynamat then new carpet. Any advice will be very appreciated.

    Thanks!

    kr
     
  2. flynbrian48
    Joined: Mar 10, 2008
    Posts: 6,512

    flynbrian48
    Member

    I just did the entire inside of the cab of my '48 Diamond T pickup with "Peel and Stick" duct insulation and some foil faced butyl roof repair stuff from Home Depot. Much less than Dynamat, and certainly looks like it'll work. Went from sounding like banging a drum shutting the doors to Rolls Royce like "thud". Spent $80 for everything.

    Brian
     
  3. Goodlife
    Joined: Apr 12, 2010
    Posts: 181

    Goodlife
    Member

    I have used the Eastwood product in two different cars and I feel like it works well, so I stick with what I know actually works. From what I have read here on the HAMB the home maintenance stores sell a product that some are using, probably more for cost savings than anything else. I can't say how the product compares to Eastwood or Dynamat for the desired outcomes.
     
  4. Doctor Detroit
    Joined: Aug 12, 2010
    Posts: 1,013

    Doctor Detroit
    Member


Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2020 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.