Register now to get rid of these ads!

Features Breaking Bad

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Ryan, Sep 22, 2014.

  1. Ok, I was ready to quote this before I got to the Frank Mack roadster. What I was going to say and still will is: who, other than Frank Mack, ran E&J lights back when our traditions were established?

    To me 'traditional' parts are those that were 'the done thing.' I'm sure someone can dig out a photo of some odd example, but other than Frank's left field application BITD, I don't see E&J's as traditional. Old yes, traditional, no.

    And I have always loved Frank's car, despite the E&J's:rolleyes:
     
    falcongeorge likes this.
  2. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    For my money, they work on the Mack car because the rest of the car is so slick especially the nose and hood. So if you take that, and then ask yourself how "slick" a stand-up '32 grill and hood are, you can probably read between the lines, nudge, nudge, wink, wink...
    But then I have always been big on the "horses for courses" approach, rather than the "pile of cool but incongruous parts" approach that seems to be so popular.
     
  3. That stude powered coupe is still around and the owner is on the HAMB. He is in the Sioux falls area
     
    bowie likes this.
  4. I just noticed this comment. Tell Jason Trent says hi!
     
  5. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    To be honest, I didnt open the blog till now(I wont say why), just looked at the front 3/4 shot Ryan led with.
     
  6. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,674

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    All of those strong opinions... From one photo?!?

    I hate the Internet.

    :)


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  7. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    What strong opinions? About Frank Macks car? I havent said one word directly about the '32 you posted. Not one. I just went back and read my posts to make sure.

    I dont really need to look at more photos of the Frank Mack car, I have been looking at photos of it for 45 years, its pretty clear in my mind at this point...:rolleyes::)
     
  8. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,674

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    That's cuz I'm stupid and had the comments of another member in my head when I saw your reply. Told ya - I hate the internet.

    Sorry sir.
     
  9. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Thanks Ryan. No problem, If I had a dime for every time I got posts mixed up on here, I'd have at least $2.50...:D
     
  10. Muttley
    Joined: Nov 30, 2003
    Posts: 18,500

    Muttley
    Member

    [​IMG]
     
    falcongeorge likes this.
  11. Just thinking again about "tradition" and cool.
    This 32 with all the cool stuff was built in the 70's.
    Frank Mack's roadster was built in the 40's
    Here we all are talking about both eons later
    and they both still generate tons of interest.
    Why they do that is because the guys who built them
    built what they liked, NOT what the other guys
    thought they should.
    There isn't a "street rod" in the world that can hold anybody's
    interest for 10 minutes, but here we are discussing stuff that happened
    40-70 years ago, and we all still have enough interest in it to talk about it.
    I'm proud to be a part of this group of guys that Get It!
     
    bowie likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.