Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Back to steering . .

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by PetesPonies, Feb 6, 2021.

  1. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    Preface : 1930 Model A Pickup. I would rather have side steer. I have a Toyota box that would do side steer, a Vega box for cross steering and getting a Mustang box for side steer would be very, very easy :) I have a 289 engine, stock front crossmember, flipped the firewall twice (it is still just tacked). As I position the engine . I'm trying to figure steering box and exhaust. Pics show some hugger headers I had hoped to use, and also some 289 Hipo manifolds. The original location for the side steering box is exactly where my frame mounts for the engine want to be located. So even a F1 box would not mount there. Have I just pushed the engine back too far? Once I remove the huggers, the Hipo manifolds give me much more room for steering linkage. If you can see well enough in the pics, what are your thoughts?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. chevyfordman
    Joined: Oct 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,358

    chevyfordman
    Member

    My experience, the Vega is great with a pan hard rod but it is so far forward that it affects the column being straight to clear the engine so the steering shaft clears the headers. The mustang is great too but it hangs down so low but it clears the engine well. It keeps the column from being real straight too so you can clear the engine and it doesn't need a pan hard rod. Don't be afraid to make some headers to fix things the way you want them to fit. I find most things out of the box, need to be altered some. Good luck
     
  3. jaxx
    Joined: Mar 22, 2008
    Posts: 402

    jaxx
    Member

    shorten the steering shaft and mount the box inside something like this and you can get side steer like you want - just a thought - jaxx 1.jpg alt steering box.jpg
     
    TCATTC likes this.
  4. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    Don't want cowl steering :) I'm trying to build an early 60s Rod.
     
    dana barlow likes this.

  5. Never2old
    Joined: Oct 14, 2010
    Posts: 737

    Never2old
    Member
    from so cal

    Are you using split bones? If so you want to keep the box near to the same pivot. That’s not going to be easy with the Mustang. Not a problem with (gasp) 4 bars.
    I put one in my ‘33 50 years ago and with a solid shaft it put the column between my feet. I’m putting a Vega in it with it’s resurrection.


    Sent from my iPhone using H.A.M.B.
     
  6. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    Yes, split wishbones. For the 60s look, I like the side steer. But it seems even with the Vega box, I'll need some articulation to the steering shaft. So I'm open for anything at this point.
     
  7. nochop
    Joined: Nov 13, 2005
    Posts: 3,838

    nochop
    Member
    from norcal

    I think I would start with what can’t move, commit the engine, trans and exhaust. Then engineer from there. Maybe even get the front axle and bones mocked up. Get some dowel rod and a universal joint too, might take some guess work out. Good luck.
     
    Frankie47 and Tman like this.
  8. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    That I am afraid of doing. Once the engine is planted, it's planted ( sure anything can move, but I don't want to move it ). So I just want to make sure I haven't chosen a bad locating for the engine mounts. Anyone else have theirs right where the original box mounted? Seems weird . .but?
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2021
  9. nochop
    Joined: Nov 13, 2005
    Posts: 3,838

    nochop
    Member
    from norcal

    That’s why I signed off saying “good luck”. Sometimes committing is a hard thing to do.
     
  10. nochop
    Joined: Nov 13, 2005
    Posts: 3,838

    nochop
    Member
    from norcal

    Here maybe this might help, C987C1E3-0D26-434B-947C-8EFD7ABC097E.png
     
  11. nochop
    Joined: Nov 13, 2005
    Posts: 3,838

    nochop
    Member
    from norcal

    Found this ( just chilling ) 6F5E622C-D5BE-4715-991E-F00DA7CCDFC3.jpeg
     
  12. How about the reversed Corvair box mounted on the top rail? If your fenderless it should work.
     
  13. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,214

    mgtstumpy
    Member

    Single U-joints operate up to 35 degrees, doubles U-joints operate up to 70 degrees, all you require is a support bearing. They can solve clearance and steering issues.
    upload_2021-2-7_12-52-13.png
    upload_2021-2-7_12-51-49.png
     
    nochop likes this.
  14. KenC
    Joined: Sep 14, 2006
    Posts: 1,050

    KenC
    Member

    Have you trial fitted the Toy box? The early solid axle FWD boxes are compact and might fit. I have a power version that is in my plans for the 54 dodge PU.
     
  15. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    I will be fenderless.
     
  16. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    Well, I have held it at different locations . like I'm doing in the pic with the Vega box. I "think" it would be best mounted up top, as was mentioned with the Corvair . .but the Toyota needs nothing done to it. It's a manual box, 72- FJ or such. When I place it up on the frame, it's a sharp angle to get the steering wheel right . . it seems. No experience . so maybe it's not that bad. I've seen 2 joints in columns . .would rather just have one.
     
  17. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    yeah, I have certainly seen these . would rather just have one . .
     
  18. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    That's a good picture of what I'm trying to figure . . for sure. They have filled the holes in teh frame, so can't tell exactly where they planted it . .but I think it's close to where I am. But damn . .how many joints in the shaft?? yikes
     
  19. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    With a boxed frame, do you set the Vega box "into" the frame, or mount it on the engine side of the boxed frame ?
     
  20. TCTND
    Joined: Dec 27, 2019
    Posts: 559

    TCTND
    Member

    Reversed Corvair box is pretty narrow. Might sit essentially on top of your frame without pushing the pittman arm too far out.
     
  21. nochop
    Joined: Nov 13, 2005
    Posts: 3,838

    nochop
    Member
    from norcal

    Side of the frame
     
  22. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

  23. junkman8888
    Joined: Jan 28, 2009
    Posts: 1,035

    junkman8888
    Member

    First off, you need to build "mock-up mounts" for the engine and transmission; the mount for the engine can be a simple piece of heavywall tubing bolted to the front of the engine and is long enough to lay across the frame rails, the one for the transmission bolts to the transmission and is clamped to the bottom of the frame rails. These allow the engine/transmission to be slid back and forth as needed, properly centered, then clamped into place so you can build the actual engine/transmission mounts. (Oh, by the way, there's no way of telling if the engine is in the right place until you mount the special shortened water pump, upper and lower pulleys, fan, and radiator.)

    If you really want side-steer, my advice is to use the F-1 box and move the engine mounts forward as needed. To do this you may have to make new engine mount plates (that's the plate that is bolted directly to the block) so the biscuit mount can be moved out of the way of the steering box.

    You never mentioned what front axle you will be using, or front spring setup, ect, but my advice is don't split the bones unless you have to, and if you have to, try to use the kit that keeps the bones under the car near the transmission.
     
    nochop and RICH B like this.
  24. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    I have the engine mocked so it can slide as it is right now. The height is where the mounts would be sitting once welded. The crossmember I mentioned is stock. The axle is stock. I don't want a dropped axle. The axle is built, painted and ready :) So with the stock crossmember and axle, I need the engine back. That is why I took the time to double flip the firewall. There's no way a steering box is going in the stock location . I just can't see it.
     
  25. Perhaps a redesigned engine mount.Move the mount forward 6 inches,and run it straight back to the rubber biscuit.It would look like a L .That would open up the stock location.Then its a matter of will the exhaust clear a shaft? Im not a SBF guy so this is just off the top of my head.....Take a passenger side manifold,and install it on the drivers side.Now the exhaust dumps forward.Make a header pipe that doubles back,and down.
     
    ted kovacs likes this.
  26. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    Well the Hipo manifold I posted a picture of definitely opens up clearance. Issue I see with your engine mount is it is levering all the force off the end . . like a diving board . . unless you came from the other direction with a brace . . no?
     
  27. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,485

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    Your motor is way to far back.
    Run the Toyota box side steering in the original location.
    Weld a flange on it like an F1 box. It works mint.
    You will have to move the motor up and right a very small amount. I have a Desoto hemi in a 34 frame and the engine is centered but sits up pretty high.
     
    Nailhead A-V8 likes this.
  28. sdroadster
    Joined: Jul 27, 2006
    Posts: 425

    sdroadster
    Member

    The critical dimension is fan or water pump clearance to the radiator. Install those two things, and deal with the rest. You currently have too many dimensional unknowns to proceed. As to the left engine mount, I had a situation like yours once. I fabricated a new mount that located the biscuit to the rear several inches. That cleared up space for a low hanging alternator that I wanted to hide.
     
    RICH B likes this.
  29. PetesPonies
    Joined: Nov 6, 2007
    Posts: 402

    PetesPonies
    Member
    from Maryland

    Correct, but some of those things have been figured, into where it is now sitting. I know you can't tell from my pic . .but I have allowed space for the fan to where the radiator mounts. I do not have a radiator, yet. I know that would be best. But I have done a lot of measurements and I'm pretty sure I am in the ballpark as it sits. I don't mind buying a radiator now. Which radiator would you recommend?
     
  30. AHotRod
    Joined: Jul 27, 2001
    Posts: 12,216

    AHotRod
    Member

    Pete: You have been given some really good suggestions and direction to use so far.

    Note #1: Personally, I would not use those biscuit type engine mounts, as we have seen them "crush" in a short time frame which changes engine location and everything else. I always use factory side mount engine mounts and fabricate to the design needs.

    #2: Where are your radius rods going to attached to the frame at?

    #3: Have you mocked up everything on the engine, ie: fan,alternator,radiator,hoses, belts, water pump, oil filter, etc. for proper clearances?

    I have used Reversed Corvair and Reversed early mustang steering boxes on my fenderless Model A's.... the choice is all based on where everything else ends up at. The pitman arm needs to be at the intersection point of the radius arm attachment point. In most cases there is not allot of front suspension travel in a straight axle Hot Rod, so not being perfect "can be ok", but you must be sure.

    This is how I did the steering on my Coupe. My chassis design is allot different that what your doing, but the principals apply: I used a reversed Corvair steering box and a pitman arm I got from speedway motors.
    I designed and fabricated a mount to position it in the correct area and location to meet all my needs. This design also allows for more foot room inside around the pedals as I go through the firewall much higher than with a mustang under chassis mount.

    Here are some pictures I took this morning for you:

    image0.jpeg

    image1.jpeg

    image4.jpeg

    image5.jpeg

    image3.jpeg

    image2.jpeg

    Here is a picture of the custom mount I designed for my application:

    IMG_9353 (1).JPG

    IMG_9354 (1).JPG

    IMG_9355 (1).JPG

    IMG_9356 (2).JPG

    IMG_9357 (2).JPG
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.