Register now to get rid of these ads!

Any one want to comment on the composition of this truck?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Tnomoldw, Mar 31, 2013.

  1. mixedupamx
    Joined: Dec 2, 2006
    Posts: 513

    mixedupamx
    Member

    if it isn't real it needs to be! i'd have to agree that it would look better with a fleetside.
     
  2. Coty
    Joined: Mar 23, 2013
    Posts: 38

    Coty
    Member

    I can confirm that that is a photoshop. I've seen the original photos before, just can't remember where. I do know it's shopped though.
     
  3. chopdtop
    Joined: Sep 11, 2005
    Posts: 544

    chopdtop
    Member

    photoshopped
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 31, 2013
  4. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,661

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    Quickie

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Toymont
    Joined: Jan 4, 2005
    Posts: 1,381

    Toymont
    Member
    from Montana

    I'd drive it, I love oddball stuff.
     
  6. Tnomoldw
    Joined: Dec 5, 2012
    Posts: 1,563

    Tnomoldw
    Member

    :)Some hate it some like it, it takes all kinds.:D:cool::eek:
     
  7. well I will say that I like the two photoshop trucks better then the real one. I really really like it.
     
  8. Heo2
    Joined: Aug 9, 2011
    Posts: 660

    Heo2
    Member

    How can i make that unseen
    I think im going blind
     
  9. looks like a 66 tilt cab which had a engine doghouse, and a set of 63 pickup fenders on the bottom of the cab
     
  10. They thought about it. Lol
     

    Attached Files:

  11. Hey! I own a Pug. Shes not as ugly as that!..... Well OK maybe she is:D
     
  12. Steve Ray
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 693

    Steve Ray
    Member

    This is called a Low Cab Forward or LCF. Not quite a COE.

    Here's an earlier model:

    [​IMG]
     
  13. Buzznut
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,349

    Buzznut
    Member

    I think it's pretty neat looking. Would be cool if someone built a rampside like this...in the same spirit as the Rampside corvair rear engine van.
     
  14. 66
    Joined: Mar 14, 2013
    Posts: 23

    66
    Member
    from usa

    It looks like a Corvair Rampside with a Differant bed.
     
  15. i really like it....
     
  16. fleet-master
    Joined: Sep 29, 2010
    Posts: 1,780

    fleet-master
    Member

    Blowby's version looks cool !! and as for the Le'Universelle...I'm surprised nobody has built that yet,apart from GM that is :)
     
  17. jonzcustomshop
    Joined: Jun 25, 2007
    Posts: 1,927

    jonzcustomshop
    Member

    I thought the idea would be cool on a panel-turning it into a 60-66 version of a full size chevyvan, and did a few "photo chops"
     

    Attached Files:

  18. So-Cal Speed Sacramento
    Joined: Sep 6, 2008
    Posts: 459

    So-Cal Speed Sacramento
    Alliance Vendor
    from Sacramento

  19. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 3,958

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    looks ok to me, but where are you gonna put your feet since that spot is full of a-arms and steering gear?
     
  20. At first I kinda liked it with the shorter fleetside bed, but I agree, the proportions of the door are off, and it would be un-driveable.
     
  21. LeClaire
    Joined: Apr 4, 2013
    Posts: 37

    LeClaire
    Member
    from Minnesota

    who cares if its photoshopped, that looks great, someone needs to build it
     
  22. aaggie
    Joined: Nov 21, 2009
    Posts: 2,530

    aaggie
    Member

    Almost looks like a home made version of a Ford Econoline pickup or Corvair Greenbriar. The military always had strange versions of commercial trucks usually on flight lines that were purpose built to service aircraft.
     
  23. classic L.B.
    Joined: Dec 28, 2010
    Posts: 83

    classic L.B.
    Member

    bed looks to be a long stepside bed 55-66 chevy, I have a couple of em that are 58s-59
     
  24. RamJet1
    Joined: Apr 9, 2012
    Posts: 343

    RamJet1
    Member

    I like it a lot, and the black one jonzcustomshop posted just rocks!

    Section in 4" in the body and bed, and it just might buy you enough room for wheels and feet.
     

    Attached Files:

  25. slammed
    Joined: Jun 10, 2004
    Posts: 8,150

    slammed
    Member

    Looks cool. And a lot better than some of the recent avatars of schlock rodders. Someone give this to Kenny Baker and a blank check. Tornado powered beach'z.
     
  26. Tnomoldw
    Joined: Dec 5, 2012
    Posts: 1,563

    Tnomoldw
    Member

    :)Well since this thread sucked and was a bust , I came up with a simple question, Who is this guy , Is he a car guy ?:eek::D
     

    Attached Files:

  27. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,661

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    Why would there be less leg room than in a regular van? Looks about the same situation as my Econoline.
     
  28. Skavangs49_Merc
    Joined: Nov 10, 2012
    Posts: 158

    Skavangs49_Merc
    Member
    from Sturgis,SD

    Definetely not a 66 I can already tell because of the doors. I'm sure it was photoshopped and can tell it was a stepside 63-65 C-10.
     
  29. SquireDon
    Joined: Aug 8, 2010
    Posts: 600

    SquireDon
    Member
    from Oregon

    I love this custom.

    Reminds me of what a life sized 60's Tonka truck I used to have.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.