Register now to get rid of these ads!

Air ride pros, I need your help!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Beef Stew, Jan 4, 2012.

  1. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    I made the (possibly bad) decision to try and use air sleeves on the back of my Model A tudor sedan. No compressor, no tank, just a static setup. I thought it'd be a good idea (this is my first time doing air ride and actually my first time building a car) but now that I've actually tested the sleeves on the car I'm not so sure. I'm using a two link with panhard bar similar to the nascar truck arm setup and the sleeves are mounted immediately ahead of the rear axle.

    I have two different pairs of Air Lift sleeves - one short pair and one longer pair. With the longer sleeves (4.5" diameter) installed the problem is this: it only takes 30-35 psi of pressure to get the car up to desired ride height but at this height the sleeve is entirely too springy. If I fill the sleeves to get the back end up 2-3" and then sit on the rear cross member that's right over the axle I can actually get the frame to bottom out on the frame. If I stand up the car goes up a couple inches, sit down and the car goes down. If I lean on one side of the car it wants to flop over. Basically, the sleeve is entirely too soft and even if I bump the pressure up to 45-50 psi the spring is still too soft plus the car is now at double the desired ride height.

    If I use the shorter sleeves (4.0" sleeve) and take them to max extension the spring rate actually "feels" good and the car doesn't flop around as bad. But having the sleeve at max extension is obviously no good.

    Some questions and observations...

    First, is my car potentially too light for air bags? It's only a body, frame, and engine/trans now. The engine/trans is all aluminum and weighs less than 350 lbs. No interior, fuel tank, battery, etc., in the car yet.

    It appears that the larger diameter sleeve is almost always softer feeling than the smaller diameter sleeve. Are bigger bags softer than smaller bags?

    I don't want the ride height to change +/- 2" every time I get in or out of the car or fill up the fuel tank or whatever. What do I need to do in order to accomplish this?

    This will literally be the biggest kick to the nuts if this setup doesn't work. I've spent so much time setting this up and building it in a unique way to make things clean and packaged well. I'd really fuckin' hate to have to cut it all off and start over again.

    Please help!!
     
  2. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    BTW I can take pics or measurements if it'll help.
     
  3. XXL__
    Joined: Dec 28, 2009
    Posts: 2,117

    XXL__
    Member

    Either bag has its place in a properly set up suspension. You need to find out (manufacturer specs) what proper "ride height" for each spring is, and then set up top and bottom mounts accordingly. My truck (definitely heavier than yours) runs 25# in the rear bags, and works fine.

    Tell us more about your bag model numbers and/or mfg specs.
     
  4. BISHOP
    Joined: Jul 16, 2006
    Posts: 2,571

    BISHOP
    Member

    Shocks are going to help a lot with the flopping around, and the springing. You need shocks. Without them your just riding on a balloon.
     

  5. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    Ah ha. Okay, yeah still no shocks on the car yet. I didn't think it'd make that big of a difference but I assume it does?
     
  6. domepiece
    Joined: Nov 7, 2007
    Posts: 154

    domepiece
    Member

    I don't think you're going to be able to use bags that way on something that light. if you'r car is 1500# with no fuel or passengers and then you add another 500# of passengers and fuel combined then your adding 33% more weight to the vehicle. on a vehicle that weighs 4500# a 500# increase isn't that much. I would keep them on it until the vehicle is in full trim. Definately add shocks. that will keep it from bouncing and swaying so much. Once the car is all dressed out and at full weight see how the bags react. If you still aren't happy with it you could always just go with a coil spring. Or add a compressor and some 1/4 manual valves and make your frame air tight so you don't have to find room for a tank.
     
  7. BISHOP
    Joined: Jul 16, 2006
    Posts: 2,571

    BISHOP
    Member

    You also may consider lowering the mount on the bottom of the bag. this will allow for more air in the bag, and a proper ride height.

    I would get some shocks mounted first, then make that decision.

    I also would consider making the lower bag mount adjustable. Once you find your sweet spot, weld them up.
     
  8. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,331

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Bags are fine on a car that light. Put some decent shocks on.
     
  9. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    Long sleeves:

    Air Lift PN 58431
    Extended 10.25"
    Design height 6.5-8.5"
    Compressed 3.1"
    Dia 5.1"
    Max load @ 100 psi 900 lbs

    Short sleeves:

    Air Lift PN 58482
    Extended 7"
    Design height 4-6"
    Compressed 2.4"
    Dia 4.6"
    Max load @ 100 psi 870 lbs

    If I take the all the air out of the sleeves the long ones will extend to 12.5" and the short ones will extend to 9".

    With the frame sitting on the axle (aired out) the distance between the upper and lower mounting pads is 5.75". At 2" of ride height (a smudge under desired ride height) the distance is 7.5". Desired ride height is 2.75-3.00".
     
  10. BISHOP
    Joined: Jul 16, 2006
    Posts: 2,571

    BISHOP
    Member

    Sounds like the bag mounts are a little too far apart also.

    Use the 9" bag, bring your mounts closer together.
     
  11. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    All good ideas but I'm kinda stuck with what I've got now. The lower pad is mounted to the top of the link and it can't go any lower. I can however make a spacer to effectively raise the pad up.

    I thought about using the So-Cal gas shocks but I read somewhere on here that non-gas shocks may actually be better for air suspension. Thoughts?
     
  12. BISHOP
    Joined: Jul 16, 2006
    Posts: 2,571

    BISHOP
    Member

    Your going to have to move the lower bag mount, its got to be closer than what you have it at now, or it aint gona work.

    Once you get your bags working correctly, then you will know what size shock you will need. I have always used S10 pickup shocks.
     
  13. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    Here's a pic of the setup:

    [​IMG]
     
  14. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,331

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  15. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    Okay, I certainly appreciate the suggestion and it makes sense if I were to use the shorter sleeves. But, shouldn't the longer sleeves also work? I mean I made the pad distance at desired ride height exactly in the middle of the sleeve's design height. The longer sleeves are being used exactly as they're spec'd.

    BTW the 58431 sleeves are from the old Air Lift S-10 air suspension kit.
     
  16. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    Truthfully, I really want to use the longer sleeves if I can. The bigger sleeves have a metal top with a 1/2" port and two 1/4"-20 mounting holes and of course I already made my upper mounting pads specifically for this pattern. The other sleeves I have have a cheesy plastic top on them with a male threaded stud that sticks up.

    Will good shocks tame my longer squishy sleeves? Or are the shorter ones my only hope?

    Getting shocks on the back of the car will be my next project.
     
  17. BISHOP
    Joined: Jul 16, 2006
    Posts: 2,571

    BISHOP
    Member

    I think the shorter bags are going to ride better, less bounce at ride hight, your car is light. Also, the bag wont bunch up when its lowered.

    I dont see any lower bag mounts anyway, and I hope your not going to use those trailing arms, they aint gona hold up.

    You can use the taller bag i guess.
     
  18. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,331

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Depends on the wall thickness. If they are 1/4" wall, they probably would.
     
  19. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    Do you happen to have a part number?
     
  20. BISHOP
    Joined: Jul 16, 2006
    Posts: 2,571

    BISHOP
    Member

    Monroe 3680-07027136

    They run around 18 bucks
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2012
  21. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    Ah shit, what's wrong with my arms? They're 1.5"x2.5"x.120" with 1" uniballs in front and big ol plate flanges in back. I've used the same thing on a long travel off pre-runner truck and had no problems... and that was jumping the thing 6 feet in the air.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The mounts are the round discs under the sleeve. They bolt to the sleeve and then the whole thing bolts to the arm.
     
  22. BISHOP
    Joined: Jul 16, 2006
    Posts: 2,571

    BISHOP
    Member

    Well thats a lot better picture, the other shot looked like square bar stock.

    Those look really good, and the welds look good too. Good job.

    Ive got a squarewave 175 pro too.
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2012
  23. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    LOL thanks. Christ man, you had me worried.
     
  24. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    Are you running convoluted bags or sleeves? Are sleeves a good choice for my app?
     
  25. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    Yeah, great welder. I love mine. Got it for a song. Think I'm going to upgrade to a water cooled torch soon even though 90% of the high amp welding work is already done on the chassis.

    Okay, new game plan. Get shocks mounted up and see how things feel. I'll report back later. And by later I mean probably a month or two. I tend to spend more time researching, designing, and prepping than I do actually doing the physical work.

    Thanks for everyones help... especially you Bishop.
     
  26. XXL__
    Joined: Dec 28, 2009
    Posts: 2,117

    XXL__
    Member

    Currently "2600" type convoluted, but I have used "f9000" style sleeves as well. In my OP, I ASSumed you had shocks. As others have mentioned, you NEED shocks to make any real assessment. (Air) springs suspend the vehicle. Shocks control the oscillation of the spring. Also, as others have stated, and to my original ride height comment, you need to get the bag into proper ride height range... period. Make a spacer if you must.
     
  27. BISHOP
    Joined: Jul 16, 2006
    Posts: 2,571

    BISHOP
    Member

    Yea, I need to water cool mine. I bout burned the head up trying to weld aluminum.
    Let me know what you end up doing as far as parts go for the upgrade, I really need to cool mine.

    Keep us updated on the build.
     
  28. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,331

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yeah, sorry, from the top, the arms looked dainty.
     
  29. Beef Stew
    Joined: Oct 9, 2008
    Posts: 1,253

    Beef Stew
    Member
    from So Cal

    The longer sleeves are at the proper ride height range... right in the middle in fact. But they were still super bouncy thus my concern. The short sleeves are just that... too short. They were sent to me by accident by the guy I bought them from and then I got the longer ones which were what I was expecting in the first place.

    Anyways, like I was saying, I guess I gotta get some shocks on before I say yay or nay.

    Thanks again guys.
     
  30. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,331

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The shocks will do the trick.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.