Register now to get rid of these ads!

Customs 352 Ford questions

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by maverick3316, Jul 11, 2014.

  1. 57Custom300
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 1,425

    57Custom300
    Member
    from Arizona

    The cork ends on the intake gaskets will probably start to leak oil after you get it running so you might as well replace them now. The intake manifold is easier to handle now than when it's in the vehicle anyway. While your at it, install the dist. so the vacuum advance it oriented correctly.
     
  2. V8 Bob
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 2,966

    V8 Bob
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You may be thinking of the M/D 2V 330 truck FT version of the FE, used in the '70s, and on U-haul F-350s. The 330 had the smallest FE/FT bore of 3.875" with the 352/360 stroke of 3.500". Some of these used a rare rear sump oil pan, like the one I'm using on my '40 with an FE.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2014
  3. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,220

    sunbeam
    Member

    I've got a Ford 3+1 RUG style trans behind my 76 f 100 with a 360.
     
  4. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    T5s are found in lots of cars, I like the mustangs myself. Different installations have different gearshift locations, different gear ratios, different input and output shafts, etc. You can do a search online about T5 swaps and find a ton of information.
     
  5. V8 Bob
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 2,966

    V8 Bob
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The T-5 is lightweight in torque capacity and not the best choice for any big block, as they were only behind small block engines from the factory. Good choices are '60s Ford 3 speeds with and w/o od, the famous top loader 4-speeds from '64 up to the '70s, and the TKO (best imo) for a 5-speed/overdrive option.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2014
  6. maverick3316
    Joined: Feb 11, 2014
    Posts: 42

    maverick3316
    Member

    Okay guys, here are some more pictures
     

    Attached Files:

  7. maverick3316
    Joined: Feb 11, 2014
    Posts: 42

    maverick3316
    Member


    This is a great article. I was always told that the 5 speed from a v-6 s-10, is the same as a mustang.... not always true
     
  8. No, it's not. The S-10 version is non-world class but the Mustang ones were. Pretty tough gearbox up to a point. You can break anything if you beat on it hard enough.
     
  9. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    My guess would be that the engine in question will be putting out a lot less torque/horsepower than most health 5.0s! But if it is going to end up over say 350hp, then yep might want to consider something else (although there are mustang guys dragging with more hp that even that running T5s). Lots of better transmissions that's for sure, but they cost more and are harder to deal with.
     
  10. maverick3316
    Joined: Feb 11, 2014
    Posts: 42

    maverick3316
    Member

    Any one have any more ideas on the motor? Did the pics help any?

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  11. greaseyknight
    Joined: Sep 27, 2010
    Posts: 225

    greaseyknight
    Member
    from Burley WA

    Head are D2TE-AA, which according to google looks to be the standard 360/390 heads, and the sticker on the valve cover seems to confirm that. Can't make out any of the other numbers, you'll have to google them.

    You probably have a pretty standard 360/390 truck motor. I would be hesitant to but a T-5 behind a FE, just for the amount of torque they produce.
     
  12. maverick3316
    Joined: Feb 11, 2014
    Posts: 42

    maverick3316
    Member

    I don't trust the valve cover, too easy to change them.

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  13. woodbutcher
    Joined: Apr 25, 2012
    Posts: 3,310

    woodbutcher
    Member

    As nobody has yet mentioned it.When dealing with that intake manifold,keep in mind that it weighs in the neighborhood of 115 pounds.
    Good luck.Have fun.Be safe.
    Leo
     
  14. 58custom
    Joined: Jan 1, 2009
    Posts: 398

    58custom
    Member

  15. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Looked up some values, hard to find much! The 360 is around 327 ft/lbs and the 390 around 376 ft/lbs. Not sure if that is pre or post smog heads? But 327 ft/lbs is pushing the upper end limits of a stock T5Z. So, if it was Hot Rodded any you would be correct, might want to look for a stronger tranny.
     
  16. maverick3316
    Joined: Feb 11, 2014
    Posts: 42

    maverick3316
    Member



    I would ask questions there, but they have not approved me to post yet....

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  17. maverick3316
    Joined: Feb 11, 2014
    Posts: 42

    maverick3316
    Member


    327ft/lbs is decent for the street. I ll keep my eye out for a better trans.
    My friend has a c6 that he will give me, but I'm sure it is a small block c6

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  18. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Not sure there is such a thing as a small block C6, I will have to check. Think they were all C4s. C6 is a good transmission, but remember, no overdrive!
     
  19. seb fontana
    Joined: Sep 1, 2005
    Posts: 8,492

    seb fontana
    Member
    from ct

    They did put C6 behind 351 like in trucks and vans, had one..
     
  20. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Five different C6 bell housing varieties exist for use with various Ford engine families:
    So, if you classify 300 I6 and 351 Cleveland as small ford engines, yes
     
  21. maverick3316
    Joined: Feb 11, 2014
    Posts: 42

    maverick3316
    Member

    Ford offered a c6 on 351 Cleveland's, and they were small blocks right?
    But I did find out they made an FE C6.

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  22. maverick3316
    Joined: Feb 11, 2014
    Posts: 42

    maverick3316
    Member

    I just read about them on wiki.
    I don't have enough luck for the one that my buddy has to be an FE trans.
    No od would be fine for now.... Until I can afford the proper trans

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  23. 57Custom300
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 1,425

    57Custom300
    Member
    from Arizona

    Had a C6 in a 77 Ranchero 351M way back when. The 79 Ranchero I have now w/351M has a C4 in it.
     
  24. 57Custom300
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 1,425

    57Custom300
    Member
    from Arizona

    Looking at your pictures I can see the rear intake cork has already shifted & split. It will leak like crazy there. Like I mentioned before, it's easier to deal with the intake now than when it's in the vehicle. After you pull the intake it's only 10 more bolts to get the head off. Save yourself some trouble and pull the head now. That way you'll know what you have & it won't leak oil from the rear of the intake when your done.
     
  25. V8 Bob
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 2,966

    V8 Bob
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Ford did offer the C6 behind 302s in limited quantity in vans and maybe pickups, but a much better choice would be the '80s/early '90s AOD.
     
  26. I have a small-block bolt pattern C-6 behind a 351 C in my Model A. Same bolt pattern as a 302/351W. The C-6 for the 351M (the M stands for modified)-400's is the same bolt pattern as the 385 series engines (429-460). Good luck with your project.
     
  27. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,102

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    AOD's never came with an FE bellhousing, they only came with the Windsor pattern. So there are two options: buy an adaptor from Bendsten's or Wilcap to go from the FE to the Windsor pattern, or machine the AOD bellhousing off and adapt a Cruis-O-Matic bellhousing to the AOD pump. Neither option is cheap by any stretch of the imagination. I know, I have seen me do it. If maverick3316 is using a barnyard 360 in his project, he is probably not going to want to outlay a bunch of cash for an adaptor. His best option is a 3spd + OD out of a mid 60's FE powered Galaxie, or a 4 speed top loader or C6 auto if he can get by without overdrive. A T5 anything will not last long behind a stock FE, let alone a built one. My little '62 352 FE makes 375 ft-lbs peak, and over 300 ft-lbs from 2500 rpms on up. A 2500 rpm clutch drop is not all that aggressive, and it would most likely scatter a T5 if any traction what so ever was found.

    My AOD from Broader's Transmission with an adapted Cruis-O bellhousing.
    [​IMG]


     
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2014
  28. ynottayblock
    Joined: Dec 23, 2005
    Posts: 1,954

    ynottayblock
    Member

    pull the head. its not hard or much work, and you'll know exactly what you have.
     
  29. V8 Bob
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 2,966

    V8 Bob
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.