Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods 350 chevy vs. 351 cleveland

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Zenbone, Jun 19, 2014.

  1. Zenbone
    Joined: Apr 1, 2014
    Posts: 69

    Zenbone
    Member

    going into a planning mode for a 1932 ford hiboy i am budgeting for. I often see them with either a 350 chevy or a 302 ford. My question to you guys would be is there any huge difference in price or performance between dropping in a 351 cleveland vs a 350 chevy? or any other issues that i might not yet grasp like better fit, etc?
     
  2. 350 Chevy. Built from 1967 to 1995 (or such-like). Very rare and expensive.
    351 Cleveland. Built 1971-1972-1973. Common as grass. Cheap. And easy, like me.

    Cosmo

    P.S. Sarcasm is just one more service offered for free, on the HAMB
     
    ffr1222k likes this.
  3. OahuEli
    Joined: Dec 27, 2008
    Posts: 5,243

    OahuEli
    Member
    from Hawaii

    In my opinion, the 350 Chevy is a good, solid, reliable engine and about as exciting as a bowl of mashed potatoes. The 351 Cleveland, especially with a pair of 4V heads, will scream like a banshee and out torque the sbc all day long.
     
    WB69, powrshftr and Hookedtrout like this.
  4. bonzo-1
    Joined: Oct 13, 2010
    Posts: 342

    bonzo-1
    Member

    whats wrong with a 347 (stroker 302) or a 351 windsor which can be stroked into the 420s if you want big inch

    You could built two 347s for the cost of one 351C
     

  5. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 3,958

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Solution:


    A "Clevor" -Windsor block and Cleveland heads

    posted via smoke signals made with a Mexican blanket
     
    Deuces likes this.
  6. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,121

    327Eric
    Member

    you can build a 347 Stroker from scratch for 1000 dollars? I'll take one.

    How much space do you have, and what do you want. Clevelands can be had for cheap if you have a little patience in your search, I still find them at Pick n pull every few months. The odds of finding a set of closed chamber 4v heads are a little(or lot) worse, however good power can be made with 2-v heads.
    Including the cost of the engine, I have about $2000 into my last one, minus the roller rockers, which I had. Mine was stock displacement, but there are stroker kits for Clevelands out there too.
    The fit on the bottom should be the same, but the heads, and therefore exhaust will be wider, and require custom headers, as opposed to off the shelf parts, and induction setups are limited. The Cleveland is also Muscle car Era engine, and there is no way around that for the sake of tradition and appearance.

    Chevy-cheap, unlimited options for build style, fit well, , reliable, I love em, but everyone has one. Not a Ford.

    If you want to be a little different, and mess with people, build a Clevor.
    http://302clevor.blogspot.com/2012/12/the-302-clevor.html
    Nowadays you can make better power with a Windsor, but in the Old days, the Cleveland was it.
     
    WB69 likes this.
  7. Zenbone
    Joined: Apr 1, 2014
    Posts: 69

    Zenbone
    Member

    as always budget is a factor, which is what continually pushes me toward the standard built up Chevy 350. It would be cool to run the ford engine but chasing down parts and making budget are always a concern. I am formulating a "must have" list and a "would be nice" column. Right now the Ford 351 is falling into the "would be nice" territory. The ultimate goal will be a wicked but drivable split time daily driver (daily driver time shared with a modern S2000).
     
  8. Building a sbc is going to be the easiest on the budget. HRP
     
    Deuces likes this.
  9. Yep.
    We got off on a tangent here. The GM offering is going to be cheaper and way easier to make look the part if you are trying to build a traditional looking car. I am biased as a rule but I have to say something, given my options if I had the clevland I would use it, it is a better engine.
     
    tankcmdr likes this.
  10. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,377

    indyjps
    Member

    The cleveland won't be traditional, will put you in a 1970 timeframe, that's not terrible, there were some cool builds then before it got silly. Cleveland will definately be more interesting and I'm a chevy small block guy. Since you're not locked into a traditional timeframe get aftermarket heads for the cleveland and paint them. Check out popular hot rodding's article on Jon Kaase's 400M for engine masters challenge, it was more than a street engine but you could pull some tricks for it, 400M's are cheap and used longer than 351C's. A 351C with worked 2V heads and a decent cam will run well, see what you can find
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2014
  11. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    327 beats both of them....
     
  12. People cop shit around here for SBC's and you are asking about a Cleveland? For this board a calendar would be a better guide.
     
    BoilermakerDave likes this.
  13. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,725

    George
    Member

    That would take out the 350/400s also...
     
  14. Yep and the 460s and the 302s and the yayhoo cup winning blown 454s and the 472 and 500 inch caddys and the 455s and the list could go on for ever.
     
  15. TTTT8
    Joined: Jun 2, 2011
    Posts: 61

    TTTT8
    Member

    Clevelands in hi-boys work just fine! Even in Model A's.
     

    Attached Files:

    Deuces likes this.
  16. mammyjammer
    Joined: May 23, 2009
    Posts: 512

    mammyjammer
    Member
    from Area 51

    Chasing down parts for a Ford engine? It not a Novi or an Offy!!
    The myth that Ford parts are hard to find is certainly not supported by people who actualy own them.
     
    LM14 and WB69 like this.
  17. DocWatson
    Joined: Mar 24, 2006
    Posts: 10,278

    DocWatson
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You see, 351 is like one more than a 350. Of course its better and its Ford, its like going to 11.....better!

    Doc.
     
  18. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,377

    indyjps
    Member

    An interesting build would be to dress whichever engine you choose as a stock engine, looms and everything, make it look like it was pulled straight from a wrecked vehicle and dropped in your car in 1970.
    Its your car, your build, work with whatever engine want, what you can find, and what fits your budget. It may or may not fit in here. Excellent craftsmanship and execution seems to draw acceptance on builds that stray from the time period, fab it yourself and stay away from the catalogs.
     
  19. stimpy
    Joined: Apr 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,546

    stimpy

    I have to disagree with you the mashed potatoes would be more exciting ..... SBC 265-400 are like belly buttons ( isnt it the reason why we call them this ?? ) seems like every rod has one . as much as I do not like FERds the Cleveland family are a different looker.
     
  20. mtburger
    Joined: Oct 21, 2010
    Posts: 22

    mtburger
    Member

    I am a HUGE Cleveland fan. I own several examples that are installed in off topic cars, have acquired a mountain of spares, and I am in full blown hoarding mode for anything I come across when I see it.

    No it is not traditional, and as a rule, there is way more SBC stuff available, so generally they cost more to equip with intakes, and valve covers, but I have found many great deals over the years.

    If you come across a complete 70-71 "M" code 10.5:1 compression 4V motor and perform a standard rebuild they are a solid 330-350 horse depending on cam, intake, and carb combo, but they really respond to big cams, ignition, and headers.

    I attached a couple pictures.

    The second one is a 408, pump gas, factory iron headed street motor that dyno'd 581 hp @ 7000. I searched for a bit to come up with the Bud Moore intake for the cool factor, but I am sure it would have topped 600 horse with one of the newer technology Roush intakes that were produced prior to the Yates C3 head program of the 80's.

    The last comment I have is that the best "Bang for the Buck" intake is an Edelbrock Torker single plane. Last one I got, I picked up for $25.00 at the Mothers Day swap meet in Mansfield, Ma.

    Good luck with your project, and please feel free to reach out to me if you would like any additional detail information on parts or builds.

    Mike H.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Deuces likes this.
  21. Rex_A_Lott
    Joined: Feb 5, 2007
    Posts: 1,155

    Rex_A_Lott
    Member

    Look at the pic above of the engine in the car. Notice the distance between the valve cover and the radiator. This is a big reason you dont see this engine used in the application you are thinking of. As HRP said, there's no way around the fact that most things for a SBC are cheaper. Good Luck with your project.
     
  22. dad-bud
    Joined: Aug 22, 2009
    Posts: 3,884

    dad-bud
    Member

    If budget is going to be your choke point, then the SBC will be kinder to your pocket just about every time.
    As for the better motor, the 4V Clev heads flow big-block numbers. Even the 2V's flow good with a decent intake and carb combo (i.e. not the crap original 2V stuff), though they appreciate the larger valves if possible.
    The bottom end on a stock Clev isn't too good for much north of 6-6500 rpm, so the big-flow heads can't really be used to their full potential without beefing up the bottom end somewhat, which is a shame.
    SBC's don't flow so good (as the 4V Clev), and their bottom ends aren't really any better than the Fords (unless you start spending money on the bits that need fixing or upgrading). They are probably a better 'balanced' motor, with the top-end and bottom-end both reaching their maximum at about the same revs.
    Am I biased? No. I have got a 70 4V 351 Cleveland as well as a SBC in a couple of my cars. They're both good, but unless you are going to all-out max performance (= +++$$$$$$$), then the SBC will provide you with a good useable motor for lower cost. You can use the extra bucks for some other parts you are going to need.
    Anyway, that's my $0.02 - you can do whatever you want, after all, it's your car.
    Cheers.
     
    Deuces likes this.
  23. mtburger
    Joined: Oct 21, 2010
    Posts: 22

    mtburger
    Member

    I am not looking for controversy, but this I do not agree with. That picture is of a full frame 73 Montego GT, and it has a huge engine compartment. That fan spacer is 3 inches long just to get the fan close enough to the radiator to work.

    From a space perspective, and speaking in general terms, a Cleveland will fit anywhere a 66 up 289 with the six bolt bell housing will fit. The bell housing bolt pattern, motor mount locations, & bore spacing, are exactly the same.

    As mentioned previously you can put Cleveland heads on any SBF and bolt them down.

    The distance from the back of the block, to the water pump pulley face is very close also, with only a nominal increase in that dimension, depending on which pump is used.

    The "general terms" I am speaking of, are related to the increased deck height, and width at the top of the motor.

    For example, you can bolt a 351c into a 65 Mustang, but you will not get manifolds on it without cutting the shock towers, where as a Boss 302 will fit with a pricey set of headers.

    Height is not an issue on a Model A, so I would not consider space to be an issue.

    Thanks, Mike H.
     
  24. bonzo-1
    Joined: Oct 13, 2010
    Posts: 342

    bonzo-1
    Member


    whats wrong with a 347 (stroker 302) or a 351 windsor which can be stroked into the 420s if you want big inch

    You could built two 347s for the cost of one 351C
    -------------------------------
    you can build a 347 Stroker from scratch for 1000 dollars? I'll take one.
    -------------------------------
    By your rationale you can build a 351c for $2000??
    4v engines are hard to find
    2v engines small valves & low compression
    Made 4 years

    302s are common
    347 rotating assembly from northern $833
    I could accomplish the rest for another 700 or so = $1500 long block
     
  25. Zenbone
    Joined: Apr 1, 2014
    Posts: 69

    Zenbone
    Member

    Thanks for all the input guys. These kind of open end questions are always tough but i got a lot of great feedback and some really cool choices to make. Truthfully i don't think either (or any of the engines talked about for that matter) would be a mistake. It will boil down to what i can get and how much i can beef it up and shoe horn it into the deuce. Can't wait!
     
  26. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,121

    327Eric
    Member

    By my experience. 1800 as it sits in this picture, including ignition, pulleys, starter, just no waterpump.
    73 "cobra jet" 4 bolt main block
    closed chamber 4v heads
    it is a basic engine,rebuilt, not overhauled, has kb pistons. Not a pissing match, but the point is, it is not dreadfully expensive to find and build a 351 Cleveland, if you have the patience to look for the right starting point, and spend your money wisely.
     

    Attached Files:

  27. 302aod
    Joined: Dec 19, 2011
    Posts: 275

    302aod
    Member
    from Pelham,Tn.

    What's to think about ? Ford in a Ford. or Easy, Cheap, Anybody can do it, Almost everybody or somebody they know has one, you can buy parts for the swap instead of having to think a little, chevy in a Ford. Leave the chevy in a Ford for the guys that want easy.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2014
  28. RmK57
    Joined: Dec 31, 2008
    Posts: 2,685

    RmK57
    Member

    I'm a big Ford fan but I've heard the Cleveland blocks can't be bored much, like 0.030 max. So its important to get the block sonic checked before the rebuilding process starts.
     
    Deuces likes this.
  29. Ford in a Ford...what a novel idea :cool:
     
    WB69 and Deuces like this.
  30. barstowpo
    Joined: Jun 27, 2012
    Posts: 232

    barstowpo
    Member

    Build a fake Boss 302. Also called a Clevor. Any 289 or 302 block, Australian 2v Cleveland heads and the intake for the swap. You could use real 4v heads and a real Boss 302 intake if you wish. The Aussie heads have 2v port sizes to increase velocity but the better quench chambers.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.