Register now to get rid of these ads!

235 for my 56 210

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Zeke Fishburn, Apr 3, 2008.

  1. Looking at this motor as a replacement for the 235 in my 56 210. Came from a 58 Apache.

    Mine is a 'glide equipped car. Will I my trans bolt to this motor?

    Thanks in advance.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. fordcragar
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 3,198

    fordcragar
    Member
    from Yakima WA.

    Yes, it should bolt right in. If the 58 motor out of the truck was a stick, you probably should remove the pilot bushing in the crank.
     
  3. not so hotrod
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 87

    not so hotrod
    Member
    from MA

    "Looking at this motor as a replacement for the 235 in my 56 210. Came from a 58 Apache."

    Did 261's come in Apaches? Maybe not but if so I would check into that, unless you already did?
     
  4. arkiehotrods
    Joined: Mar 9, 2006
    Posts: 6,802

    arkiehotrods
    Member

    In '58, the 235 was the six cylinder engine on Chevrolet pickups (through '62). The 261 was an option in '61-'62.
     

  5. fordcragar
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 3,198

    fordcragar
    Member
    from Yakima WA.

    In 1954, a 261 truck engine was introduced as an optional Jobmaster engine for heavy-duty trucks. This engine was very similar to the 235 engine, except for a larger piston bore, two extra coolant holes (in the block and head) between three paired (siamesed) cylinders, and a higher-lift camshaft. The 261 USA truck engine had mechanical lifters and was available from 1954-62. In 1963, the 261 truck engines was available in 4x4 Chevrolet trucks (until the engines sold out).
    The 235 and 261 truck engines were also used by GMC Truck of Canada (GMC truck 6-cylinder engines were also used in Canada). The 1955-1962 Canadian full-size Pontiac car had an optional 261 cubic inch engine that had hydraulic lifters. This engine was not sold in the USA but was very similar to the USA truck 261.

    Source:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrolet_Straight-6_engine#261
     
  6. CLSSY56
    Joined: Dec 19, 2002
    Posts: 1,218

    CLSSY56
    Member

    If your swaping motors, I'd put a V8 in. I had a 56 with a 235, didn't like it a bit. Valve train was noisy and ticked all the time (common problem). I got quite good and pulling the valve cover and adjusting the valves on a regular basis trying to quiet it down.
     
  7. fordcragar
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 3,198

    fordcragar
    Member
    from Yakima WA.

    What I'd do is stick with the six, but might change it over to a T5 5-speed. Everyone has a SBC in their car.
     
  8. primed55
    Joined: Feb 7, 2005
    Posts: 313

    primed55
    Member

    as far as i know & correct me if i'm wrong but all gm motors (excluding maybe some late model stuff we don't give a crap about anyways) have the same bell housing to block blot pattern.
     
  9. fordcragar
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 3,198

    fordcragar
    Member
    from Yakima WA.

    If you are talking about sixes and V8's, I think that this would be true for six cylinder Chevy motors 1963 and newer and 1955 and newer Chev V8's. Pontiac, Oldsmobile, Buick and Cadilac could fit into this picture, but I'm not what or when.
     
  10. What are the odds it has an 848 head?

    Queried the owner on the head casting # but he is out of town at the moment.
     
  11. an easy way to tell a 235 from a 261 is a 261 has two captains bars cast in the block near the starter. OldWolf:cool:
     
  12. old dirt tracker
    Joined: Sep 20, 2006
    Posts: 1,003

    old dirt tracker
    Member
    from phoenix

    235/261 have nothing in common with the sbc for interchange.
     
  13. arkiehotrods
    Joined: Mar 9, 2006
    Posts: 6,802

    arkiehotrods
    Member

    I don't disagree with the info you provided, but my post refers to pickups (or other light duty trucks), not the heavy duty trucks. The OP said the engine was out of an Apache, not a heavy duty truck.

    And the source of my info is the Standard Catalog of American Light Duty Trucks, edited by John Gunnel and published by Krause Publications, publishers of Old Cars Weekly, the Old Cars Price Guide, et al.

    The 261, according the the book above, was not offered in GMC pickups. '54-'55 had a 248.5 CID inline six, '56-'62 GMCs could be had with the 269.5 (270) CID inline six, with the 305 inch V-6 introduced in '61 as an optional engine.
     
  14. fordcragar
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 3,198

    fordcragar
    Member
    from Yakima WA.

    If you go back and read the post again, it said GMC's made in Canada. I didn't know that, but could see how it did happen. They were using the 261's in Pontiac's. The GMC motors that you mentioned were US made GMC six cylinder engines, not Chev six engines.
     
  15. Arkie, READ the quote. The trucks in question were built in Canada. GMC's built in Canada more often than not had a 261 from the factory. Around here 70-80% of all full size 55-62 Pontiacs had a 261. Hell, the original engine in my 57 Chevy truck is an optional 261. Not that uncommon.
     
  16. arkiehotrods
    Joined: Mar 9, 2006
    Posts: 6,802

    arkiehotrods
    Member

    Gosh, fellas, I'm not trying to get in a pissin' contest with ya. I did read the posts...but I also consulted the above-referenced book, written by a recognized authority on automotive history (John Gunnel)...referenced to the Standard Catalog of American Light Duty Trucks...especially since OP is in Houston, Texas, and no where near Canada.

    I'm not disagreeing with anything you wrote, as I said in my previous post, but I just wonder what is the probability of a HAMBer in Houston, Texas having a Canadian-built 261 out of a Canadian-built '58 Chevy pickup.
     
  17. rick w. gafnea
    Joined: Jun 10, 2008
    Posts: 4

    rick w. gafnea
    Member

    can a 235 6 cyl. with hydraulic lifters be converted to solids ?
     
  18. Inline6
    Joined: Mar 5, 2008
    Posts: 74

    Inline6
    Member

    yea but who wants to adjust valves all the time?
     
  19. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 7,873

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    Sure ... replace the cam & lifters ....
     
  20. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 7,873

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    If the valve seats are done by someone who knows the correct seat width and cam lobes/lifters are unworn, the valve clearance should remain where it belongs once it's reset at 500-600 miles.
     
  21. PeteFromTexas
    Joined: Apr 4, 2007
    Posts: 3,837

    PeteFromTexas
    Member

     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.