Register now to get rid of these ads!

200 R4 How strong

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by john mullen, May 8, 2013.

  1. Anyone hear using the 200R4?how strong are they? and what ratio is the od?.
     
  2. raven
    Joined: Aug 19, 2002
    Posts: 4,698

    raven
    Member

    Don't know the ratio of the OD, but I know that it is a strong tranny for an OD. I've put over 400 (rwhp) at one and it's still in great shape.
    I like them.
    r
     
  3. Grumbler
    Joined: Mar 2, 2009
    Posts: 358

    Grumbler
    Member

    Strong enough to handle my Olds 455 with well over 500 ft lbs torque no problem. The OD is .70 I believe
     
    Last edited: May 8, 2013
  4. Fenders
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 3,921

    Fenders
    Member


  5. Any recomendations as to which year and type car I should look for for a core?
     
  6. Just found info in search sorry.... my bad....
     
  7. Rodney YJ
    Joined: Sep 1, 2012
    Posts: 3

    Rodney YJ
    Member

    I would like to know this as well. I like the size of the 200 and the gear ratios better than the 700.

    What mods were done to make it stronger or are you running them stock?
     
  8. hugh m
    Joined: Jul 18, 2007
    Posts: 2,143

    hugh m
    Member
    from ct.

    As long as everyone is talking, anyone got one for sale in Ct?
     
  9. Rodney YJ
    Joined: Sep 1, 2012
    Posts: 3

    Rodney YJ
    Member

    did some quick research.

    http://www.hemmings.com/mus/stories/2006/01/01/hmn_feature9.html

    1981-'88 Buick LeSabre and Electra RWD
    1981 Century
    1981-'87 Regal
    1981-'90 Cadillac Fleetwood, Deville and Brougham
    1982-'90 Chevrolet Impala and Caprice
    1981-'88 Chevelle, Monte Carlo, Malibu and El Camino
    1984-'87 GMC Caballero
    1982-'90 Olds Delta 88, 98 and Custom Cruiser
    1983-'88 Olds Cutlass 4-4-2 and Supreme
    1983-'89 Pontiac Bonneville, Parisienne and Safari Wagon
    1981 Pontiac Firebird with 301
    1984-'87 Pontiac Grand Prix

    Shift ratios for this transmission: 1st 2.74:1; 2nd 1.57:1; 3rd 1.00:1; 4th 0.67:1
     
  10. terryble
    Joined: Sep 25, 2008
    Posts: 541

    terryble
    Member
    from canada

    I like mine in my 60 Corvette but it shifts from 1 to 2 way to soon under normal accellaration, been told to change governor but what do I change to?
     
  11. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,500

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Like the 700R4 you want a donor that is 1987 or later for a build these had the lubrication upgrades the earlier versions lacked.
     
  12. Mike VV
    Joined: Sep 28, 2010
    Posts: 3,039

    Mike VV
    Member
    from SoCal

    A friend of mine "Scott McClay Engineering", builds the three speed version for drag racing. The first three gear sections of the 4R are the same as the three spd. version, and Scott's got them behind 900hp Super Stock car engines.
    The main difference between the 3 spd. and the 4 spd. version is the fourth gear.
    He'll also build the 4spd. version.

    So all that said, "first gear" thru "third gear" will hold up to just about anything. Just don't putting all 900hp into overdrive. It's for cruzin..!

    I've got two of Scott's overdrive transmissions, both have trans. brakes in them..!

    Art Carr (SoCal) is another good outlet. Plus he's got great looken office help that drives a Nostalgia Nitro Dragster.
    Art builds three versions, depending on the HP of your engine/car weight.

    http://www.scottmcclayengineering.com/
    http://www.cpttransmission.com/

    Mike

    P.s. - As you may know, the T-200-4R has much better gear ratios thAn the T-700.
     
  13. Badfella
    Joined: Jun 14, 2004
    Posts: 1,172

    Badfella
    Member

    I ran one behind a 377ci (De-stroked 400) that was a monster of an engine. Zero complaints here and it suffered many burnouts and rough driving. The 1-2 shift always sucked in mine as well but the horsepower made up for it :)
     
  14. mustang6147
    Joined: Feb 26, 2010
    Posts: 1,847

    mustang6147
    Member
    from Kent, Ohio

    This has been debated many times.... The 200r4 was put in lighter cars. Smaller planetary gear ect.... Its not a bad tranny, but Not for me. Cheaper to build a 700r4 for sure.

    good lookin truck if the red ones yours
     
  15. 45_70Sharps
    Joined: May 19, 2010
    Posts: 331

    45_70Sharps
    Member

    Cruising like that will get the ladies attention! Problem is you can't really get a look at them when you zip by.
     
  16. Tnomoldw
    Joined: Dec 5, 2012
    Posts: 1,563

    Tnomoldw
    Member

  17. Tnomoldw
    Joined: Dec 5, 2012
    Posts: 1,563

    Tnomoldw
    Member

  18. wingman9
    Joined: Dec 30, 2009
    Posts: 804

    wingman9
    Member
    from left coast

    Get the Buick turbo V6 version
     
  19. Grumbler
    Joined: Mar 2, 2009
    Posts: 358

    Grumbler
    Member

    Adjusting the TV cable in or out changes the shift points. Shorten it one or two serrations and road test
     
  20. The 200 was a light duty trans. I blew one up back in the day over about 40,000 miles of abuse - in a stock Buick with the Olds block 307 in it. But part of that came from running it hot too many times. The 87-89 version may be better as noted.
     
  21. raven
    Joined: Aug 19, 2002
    Posts: 4,698

    raven
    Member

    What about torque converters for these? What's available?
    r
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.