Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 1967 marine 327

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Steve K 1000, Jun 19, 2017.

  1. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    Hello all. I have what should be a very basic question to ask. I just bought a pair 1967 marine 327 motors. One of these underwent $1200 in work at a shop before it was stored for the last 16 years next to its twin. I took off the heads and found new trw.030 flat tops in the cyls. I pulled the 10 quart cast iron oil pan and found a forged steel crank.Then I was looking at the rods and they look to me like they are installed wrong. I thought that the thicker part of the big end always faced outside towards the crank, and the thinner side went against the other rod. These are all installed with the thicker parts touching eachother. also the #2 rod has a #8 cap on it, all the others are not marked, but it looks to me as thou the rods were resized so I'm not sure that that makes a difference. I took off one of the caps and found what looks like an oil spurt groove and hole machined into it but the bearing does not have the cut out notch in it to let oil get to it. I may be nuts, but I dont think something is rite with this. I will post some pictures if I can figure out your posting protocall.
     
  2. KoolKat-57
    Joined: Feb 22, 2010
    Posts: 3,076

    KoolKat-57
    Member
    from Dublin, OH

    If they are a pair for the same boat one will rotate the opposite of the other (reverse ground camshaft)
    Most marine engines have marine camshafts designed for a specific rpm range.
    You should check both engines very carefully to determine exactly what you have.
    KK
     
  3. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    Thank you. I understand. This is the reverse rotation motor that I am looking at now. But I dont think that changes how the the rods are installed in the block.
     
  4. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    It has been a long time since I have put a sbc together and I have never done a reverse rotation marine motor so that is why I am hoping to get set straight. Thanks for any help.
     

  5. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    Here are some pics of what I am talking about. Am I nuts? 0619171745_resized.jpg 0619171746_resized.jpg 0619171755_resized.jpg
     
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,085

    squirrel
    Member

    sure looks backwards....huh.
     
  7. justold
    Joined: Jan 28, 2013
    Posts: 15

    justold
    Member

    On a right hand rotation [opposite automotive ] pistons are mounted notch toward the flywheel end , rods mount in their normal manner .
     
  8. steinauge
    Joined: Feb 28, 2014
    Posts: 1,507

    steinauge
    Member
    from 1960

    If I were you I would have those blocks pressure checked.Once a marine engine has been run in salt water if it has a raw water cooling system the block starts to rust internally and does not stop.
     
  9. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,265

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    A little curious what the oil pan and windage tray look like.
     
  10. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    Thanks justold. These pistons are all installed with the f mark towards the front ( water pump/cam gear end) I think that the rods were pressed on backwords in relationship to to the pistons. This motor was run only long enough to set valve lash, then the original owner got sick(cancer or somthing) the boat was scraped and the other motor pulled out and they have sat for the last 16 years. A time capsul of sorts. There has to be a sbc builder on here that can look at those pictures and tell if they are installed rite or wrong.
     
  11. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    DDDeny. I have a pic of the windage tray and oil pump with the extended pick up but not of the pan. I will take one and get it on here for you. I also have all of the other cast iron parts that made this a marine moter x2.
     
  12. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

  13. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

     
  14. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    I was told that the motors came from a 36 foot fishing boat that spent its life on the great lakes,(fresh water) The block looks clean except for sitting for the past 16 years at a body shop. I have not taken apart the other one yet.
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2017
  15. pumpman
    Joined: Dec 6, 2010
    Posts: 2,674

    pumpman
    Member

    Damn, that engine sure is clean. Never done a marine engine because of the reverse thing. I'd screw it up for sure. Good luck.
     
  16. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,265

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Wow, that windage tray is the longest I've ever seen, looks like the front end of it is about ready to break off.
     
  17. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,085

    squirrel
    Member

    If you look at the rod bearings, they normally are offset towards the center, so there is room for the fillet at the edge of the journal. They sure look backwards here. And the oil hole should point "up", not "down" (ie it should go towards the cam shaft).
     
    Mikebeme likes this.
  18. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 5,412

    Fordors
    Member

    If the arrows on the pistons are facing to the front then by removing each rod and piston assembly and turning it so the arrow faces to the rear you will have the rods installed correctly, as well as having the pistons in the bores properly since the major thrust surface has switched sides with the CCW rotation. It looks as though whoever assembled the shortblock was only concerned with the " front " arrows and was not aware the rods and pistons had been assembled for a reverse rotation engine.
    In addition the crank snout and rear main seals will be different for a reverse rotation engine, there is a very fine helix molded on the seal surface that is opposite the standard (CW) engine.
    Another thing that needs mentioning is that many modern twin screw boat drives do not require a reverse rotation engine.
     
  19. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    I am thinking the same thing squirrel. This motor was put together at a shop not in someones back yard. Never put in service, only long enough to set valve lash. I think there wrong. DDDeny they tray is cracked in the front on both sides and needs to be repaired if it was going to be used again.
     
  20. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    Thanks fordors. I am not going to use this in a twin screw boat again. It will be in a boat but it will be installed just like it would be in an old chevy truck, flywheel back,transmission at the back prop at the back.I was only wondering about the thick part of the rods touching each other in stead of fascing out towards the crank.
     
  21. Steve K 1000
    Joined: Jun 19, 2017
    Posts: 14

    Steve K 1000

    If I am understanding... The pistons still need to face with the f mark towards the front(water pump end) and the rods all need to be changed to face the other way to use this as you would in any other car.
     
  22. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,085

    squirrel
    Member

    switch all the pistons/rods from one side of the engine to the other. Leave them pointed the same (to the front) as they are now.
     
  23. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,929

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Bearing companies kept the squirt hole in bearings for years but GM quit notching the rod caps. I feel they did it to "cause" problems making work for their service techs by having cams go flat. Just an opinion. Currently all the bearings we use no longer have the split hole but we give the rods a lot more side clearance and don't loose the cams. We are pretty tough on our circle track engines as they spend 20-30 laps between 4800to 7200, corners and straightaways. I'd take both completely a part and check every thing... They sound like a good deal,to me.
     
    zbuickman likes this.
  24. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 5,412

    Fordors
    Member

    In all honesty I don't know much about boats, I based my comment on the major and minor thrust surfaces from my experience with Electro-Motive Diesel engines.
    But if I understand your comment you want to use this in a single engine boat, wouldn't that require a standard, CW, rotation engine? Your first photo shows a crank gear with a helix angle and that matches the GM two gear drive for the reverse rotation cam. Again, I don't know boats but if you need a CW engine your rods are installed wrong as you believe but then you will also need a different cam and crank gear, a timing chain, camshaft and a starter.
    Or I'm all wet. Boating pun intended.
     
  25. southcross2631
    Joined: Jan 20, 2013
    Posts: 4,413

    southcross2631
    Member

    Still would pressure check the blocks as straight water with no rust inhibitor was used to cool those motors. I have seen salt water big blocks rust through the bores and the cylinder heads.
     
  26. I'm dyslexic.. it would probably come out okay.
     
    belair likes this.
  27. henryj1951
    Joined: Sep 23, 2012
    Posts: 2,306

    henryj1951
    Member
    from USA

    So much fun to work on while still (in the friken boat...lol)...
    ...
    boat350.jpg boat5.7.jpg
     
  28. henryj1951
    Joined: Sep 23, 2012
    Posts: 2,306

    henryj1951
    Member
    from USA

    Usually NOT many HOURS on --them there boat motors--- so if serviced regularly they stay purty CLEAN.
     
  29. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,085

    squirrel
    Member

    ...but the hours they do have, are wide open....
     
    46international likes this.
  30. H380
    Joined: Sep 20, 2015
    Posts: 484

    H380
    Member
    from Louisiana

    If boat engines are run with an heat exchanger and antifreeze they live fine. BUT raw water cooling in coastal areas SUCK. Rust and blown head gaskets in 4 to 5 years is my experience with Mercruisers. You need to inspect old boat motors VERY carefully if you are buying them. I would not buy one with raw water cooling period. I would look at an heat exchanger motor if I could take the heads and pan off for a look. 99% of the time the water passages are rusted solid. The engine over heats and blows the head gasket. The cylinders get saltwater in them. The boat is put up for years. Then everything is a solid rusted mess. On TOP of being warped from over heating in the first place.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.