Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 1962 Studebaker, stepside or styleside?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ChampRod, Dec 12, 2013.

  1. ChampRod
    Joined: Dec 10, 2013
    Posts: 15

    ChampRod
    Member
    from Tucson, AZ

    Ok guys, I had a question for all of you. I'm currently in the process of rodding out a '62 Champ pickup. Its got a Ford 300ci and an 8.8 rear end, with a Jaguar XJ6 IFS. The question is, what should I do for the bed? I have a box, but it's that ugly as sin dodge box that Studebaker started using. Should I pony up the time and money to find a step side bed for it? Or should I narrow the bed and tailgate so that it is flush of the cab, or maybe even inside the lines of the bed?
     
  2. studeynut
    Joined: Mar 13, 2011
    Posts: 290

    studeynut
    Member

    The original stylesides are ugly. I think I'd look at some of the newer pickup stepside beds, something with similar styling.
     
  3. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,121

    327Eric
    Member

    A stepside bed looks awesome on that truck. that said, the original styleside bed narrowed to fit would be interesting to see. Definately worth some photoshop work to see the concept at the minimum.
     
  4. 49stude2r6
    Joined: Aug 21, 2009
    Posts: 63

    49stude2r6
    Member

    Lark Wagon Quater panels made into a styleside bed. I have also seen one with a Ranger (splash?) step side on it. The lines are a little closer to the champ than the original step side IMHO.
     

  5. ChampRod
    Joined: Dec 10, 2013
    Posts: 15

    ChampRod
    Member
    from Tucson, AZ

  6. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,121

    327Eric
    Member

    After looking at the link, I'd say go with the Stude Stepside. Even narrowed the fleetside box is ugly.
     
  7. Da Tinman
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,222

    Da Tinman
    Member

    Stepside for sure.

    I want a Champ so bad I can taste it and I would do the fleetside but would narrow the bed, section the sides so that the were the same height as the cab and recurve them to match the doors. I'd also like to change the front sheetmetal out for a 64 nose.

    Yeah I'm kinda stupid and glutton for punishment. I wouldn't put anyone else thru that though.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2013
  8. LOWBLAZERO1
    Joined: Aug 3, 2009
    Posts: 435

    LOWBLAZERO1
    Member

    do a 53 nose! if you are going thru all the trouble anyway. if the dodge bed narrowed and body lines modded, it would be sweet looking. :eek:
     
  9. I saw one with a later Dakota bed on it. Looked pretty decent...
     
  10. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 8,755

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    In my opinion the Studebaker style side just can't be made to look good. It was a real mismatch when new, and even narrowed it just doesn't flow with the cab lines. The step side would be my first choice, or some step side from a donor truck that looked good.
    I love the idea of using a wagon side on the style side bed, but not sure how common a wagon donor is to find! Length of the wagon 1/4 might also be a big issue, as it's shorter.
     
  11. jroberts
    Joined: Oct 14, 2008
    Posts: 1,658

    jroberts
    Member

    I prefer the "step side" bed. I have seen a Ranger "step side" bed on a short wheelbase Champ and it looked very nice.
     
  12. aircap
    Joined: Mar 10, 2011
    Posts: 1,750

    aircap
    Member

    In the Stude Club I have seen narrowed beds that looked great, and the Ranger stepside bed looks like it belongs... Both are good choices.
     
  13. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,659

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    I would be looking for a late model box that complements the Champ body. For size it would probably be from a smaller truck like a Ranger or Dakota. You would have to use your own judgement as to what looks best.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.