Register now to get rid of these ads!

What is a "Traditional" Hot Rod?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by bczygan, Nov 7, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. bczygan
    Joined: Apr 14, 2011
    Posts: 3

    bczygan
    Member
    from Detroit

    What is the exact definition?

    Does this qualify?

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Roger Walling
    Joined: Sep 26, 2010
    Posts: 1,149

    Roger Walling
    Member

    I don't know if it is a "hot rod" or not but it, or it's twin is sitting in a shed in MA.waiting for a rebirth. How about it Conrad?
     
  3. bczygan
    Joined: Apr 14, 2011
    Posts: 3

    bczygan
    Member
    from Detroit

  4. Ryan's second post on this thread might help with some pictures: http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=828348

    I'd also add that for the purposes of this board, a traditional hotrod is a hotrod built to resemble what was being built prior to 1965; keeping in mind the age of parts being used and the build styles that were prevalent pre-65.
     

  5. steel rebel
    Joined: Jun 14, 2006
    Posts: 3,604

    steel rebel
    Member Emeritus

    Okay only 4 posts I think you are serious.

    First pick an era you like then do your homework and read mags. and search the internet or whatever you are comfortable with and study the time frame you like. Then build your car using the parts and style that was used then. Example If you are building '50s style do not use disk brakes. Yes I know they were available then but so few used them that it would be questioned.

    Now the debate begins.
     
  6. 117harv
    Joined: Nov 12, 2009
    Posts: 6,589

    117harv
    Member

    Taken from the sticky at the top of the page.



    5. Was your thread something that has been covered over and over again? Try searching next time. We've had countless threads through the years on bias tires vs. radials, the definition of "traditional," and many other topics. We don't need to rehash what the bulk of us already know.
     
  7. adam401
    Joined: Dec 27, 2007
    Posts: 2,857

    adam401
    Member

    Fuck these threads.
     
  8. VonKool13
    Joined: Feb 16, 2008
    Posts: 1,039

    VonKool13
    Member

    Agreed. Just more fodder for people who feel the need to bash other people.

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  9. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,944

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Steel Rebel pretty nailed it as far as many of us here see it. A hot rod built to resemble one that you would see in one of the car magazines in the 50's or early 60's. Say you picked up a June 1956 Hot Rod magazine and right in the rotogravure section in the middle was this little coupe that really spun your wheels. That little coupe wouldn't have any part on it that wasn't available in or before 1956. The idea is to pick the build era you like and stay faithful to it. That's a hard concept for a lot of guys to follow be it hot rod or custom as they are always reaching over the fence to later years products that don't look like the build year's products.
     
  10. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 23,875

    Deuces

    The pics are cool.......
     
  11. oldsmerc
    Joined: Feb 24, 2011
    Posts: 60

    oldsmerc
    Member
    from seattle

    I can't help but respond. In the day hot rodders tried to adapt the latest and greatest into their rides. How else would you explain Chevy motors in Fords? Hot rodders were innovators and still are. Traditional can mean whatever you want so do what you like and don't worry what others think. As for the rehash comment, remember that there are new HAMBers every day so all posts are new to them.
     
  12. 40fordtudor
    Joined: Jan 3, 2010
    Posts: 2,503

    40fordtudor
    Member

    I totally agree. I lived thru the 40s and 50s etc., and everyone tried to get an edge. Tradition differed throughout the country as well---there is NO staunch definition that is axiomatic.
     
  13. To me, the litmus test is whether the mods were/are beneficial (hotrod), aesthetically pleasing (custom), or done in response to a fad (billet/streetrod/etc).
     
  14. Deuce Daddy Don
    Joined: Apr 27, 2008
    Posts: 5,544

    Deuce Daddy Don
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    OLDSMERC nailed it!!!!!!!
     
  15. 117harv
    Joined: Nov 12, 2009
    Posts: 6,589

    117harv
    Member

     
  16. henryj1951
    Joined: Sep 23, 2012
    Posts: 2,306

    henryj1951
    Member
    from USA

    i'm younger than 65 years old
    i was borne before 1965
    the cars you talk about should be cars -n- (trucks) etc etc etc made,built before 1965
    just en-grain 1965 in your head and it will go past the
    era police 1965

    more:
    all the parts are made before 1965
    or
    copys of the (*1965 -n- older*) part.
    1965 ya just cant go wrong by sticking to the 1965 thought.
    1965 . (period)
    1965 1965 1965 1965
    now if you don't get it call me At 1-800-196-51965

    now i might get banned for trying to be of SOME help, but hay
    its post 1965 ..... j/k

    love ya ALL love the OLD cars ...
    have a nice day:cool:


    :cool:
     
  17. And that, quite thankfully, is why we don't have build threads highlighting turbo'd whatever motors being put into smart cars.

    (Turbo's and smart cars mentioned in hopes of getting this thread shut down).
     
  18. Gerry Moe
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 498

    Gerry Moe
    Member

    I always liked the term "Period Correct" instead of traditional.
    According to Websters dictionary, one definition of traditional is "The handing down of information, beliefs, and customs by word of mouth or by example from one generation to another without wriiten instruction". So to me a person building a 1980 chevrolet is building traditional.

    So as long as you are a gearhead you are a traditionalist, so just be careful when using this forum stay within their guidelines
     
  19. bczygan
    Joined: Apr 14, 2011
    Posts: 3

    bczygan
    Member
    from Detroit

    So would a belly tank rod, built or rehabbed just as it was in 52 be considered part of the mix?
    The photos above come from a Fawcett publication "Hot Rods" from 52' (Edited by my dad BTW).
     
  20. S_Mazza
    Joined: Apr 27, 2011
    Posts: 363

    S_Mazza
    Member

    If this thread is still here tomorrow, it must be traditional.
     
  21. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 21,666

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    Horse is dead.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.