Register now to get rid of these ads!

59 Apache front Suspension??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by The Engineer, Aug 9, 2013.

  1. The Engineer
    Joined: Oct 3, 2007
    Posts: 117

    The Engineer
    Member

    Hi All,

    I want to put a Cummins 6BTA 5.9 diesel in my 59 chevy apache and us it as a daily driver, so I have decided to go the Mustang 11 route, (I know I know why dont I stick with the I beam)
    well firstly the engine is stupid heavy (975lbs) so I want power steering preferably rack and im looking to get the truck quite low on the front keeping a decent suspension travel.

    so who do we reccomend for the heviest rated Mustang 11 or IFS??
    any advice on this would be greatly apprecciated.

    Thanks Jeremy :D
     
  2. choptop40
    Joined: Dec 23, 2009
    Posts: 5,173

    choptop40
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    hey hey , not a stock mustang II , check with some suppliers , go with the biggest rotors and calipers , and let them know the weight for spring selection..you could keep the straight axle and upgrade to heavy leafs and big brakes , add a power saginaw box cross steering setup..would cost more to MII . keep us posted...mac
     
  3. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    That diesel will mash the MII flat!
     
  4. cryobug
    Joined: Jun 6, 2005
    Posts: 362

    cryobug
    Member


  5. The Engineer
    Joined: Oct 3, 2007
    Posts: 117

    The Engineer
    Member

    I spoke to Fatman and all they kept saying was ooohh, thats never been done, so they werent very helpful to be honest..:(

    This is my concern!!:eek:

    There is a 1928 dodge sedan running around with a cummins in it on a what looks like 30's Ibeam car axle and it seems to have stood the test of time, been around a few years now?
     
  6. The Engineer
    Joined: Oct 3, 2007
    Posts: 117

    The Engineer
    Member

    thanks for the sugestion but I already have the engine, the 4BT is 200lbs lighter but also has half the horsepower at 105hp where as the 6bta I have pushes out 215hp which I intend to tine up considerably, also the sound of the six is much better than the four pot. :D
     
  7. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,407

    oldolds
    Member

    Straight axle, power steering box conversion, Big disc brak conversion. Only way to go with what you are planing. A well tuned straight axle set-up will ride and handle fine. A few million 18 wheelers can't be wrong.
     
    The Engineer likes this.
  8. Leave the stock axle in the truck as its gonna handle the weight of the diesel engine.
     
  9. 33willysgasr
    Joined: Nov 11, 2009
    Posts: 85

    33willysgasr
    Member

    Another alternative that a lot of people use is put a Camaro/nova subframe in it if you're stuck against using the I-beam, that way you get more modern handling a wide variety of spring choices and readily available parts to be able to work on it.
     
  10. nxcess
    Joined: Mar 30, 2013
    Posts: 108

    nxcess
    Member
    from Mesa, AZ

    IMHO the Mustang II spindles are way too light weight!!! I don't like the fact they were on my 56 pick-up when it bought it. I mine only has the 327 cu in engine. Yes, it is still in there.
    Ford did not make the Mustang II units any heavier duty than needed for the light weight Mustang II.
    I would check out a 66 or so Chevy pick-up front suspension. They are a bolt in cross member, you may need to narrow it for the 59 track width, and uses a cross steer. I adapted a later model GM power steering unit to my 66.
     
  11. flatheadpete
    Joined: Oct 29, 2003
    Posts: 10,482

    flatheadpete
    Member
    from Burton, MI

    Yep.
     
  12. classic gary
    Joined: Sep 24, 2009
    Posts: 504

    classic gary
    Member

    that's a bunch of weight on a "four cylinder" suspension. Springs are not the worry, the a arms and spindles and pot holes are the worry.........and i would not be suprised to hear the power rack and pinion "blew up" trying to steer the thing.
     
  13. JackdaRabbit
    Joined: Jul 15, 2008
    Posts: 498

    JackdaRabbit
    Member
    from WNC

    Howbout a Jag XJ6 /XJS IFS? They're pretty stout as the cars are heavy. Sweet ride.
     
  14. mechanic58
    Joined: Mar 21, 2010
    Posts: 681

    mechanic58
    Member

    Um....a Cummins diesel on top of a Mustang II suspension? Yeah. You're probably going to need some parts out of one of these:

    [​IMG]
     
  15. Barn Find
    Joined: Feb 2, 2013
    Posts: 2,312

    Barn Find
    Member
    from Missouri

    A '94-'98 Cummins is my favorite motor. Doesn't matter if its a 6 or a 4. I would use a 4bt before I would doghouse the firewall to make a six fit. The six is smoother. While the six is heavier, the power to weight ratio for the 4 is not as good. Although both motors respond to the same tuning upgrades. If using a 4bt, it is worth finding one with a stock 130 hp rating. The P7100 injection pump has a lot more potnetial for power upgrades.

    The straight axle with leaf springs will handle the weight much better. The Cummins is a tall motor. Oil pan clearance is usually tight in 4WD applications. That might dictate how low you can drop it.
     
  16. using the Camaro clip might get you some extra room for that tall Cummins :D
     
  17. The Engineer
    Joined: Oct 3, 2007
    Posts: 117

    The Engineer
    Member

    Thanks for all the input guys, I know disc brake conversions are available for 55-59 chevy trucks but are dropped spindles also available??
    if so the I-beam might be more appealing....
     
  18. Gator
    Joined: Dec 29, 2005
    Posts: 4,016

    Gator
    Member

    On a straight axle "dropped spindles" aren't normally used, rather the axle is 'dropped' - heated and bent to lower the ride height. You can have yours dropped or buy one already one.

    I have disc brakes, monoleaf springs, and a CPP power steering conversion on the straight axle on my '55 - I'm installing a Camaro clip this winter so it will all be for sale... ;)
     
  19. Mustang II components are a lot more stout than many realize. The upper ball Joints are the same as Lincoln Continent from the 70 (Big Boats) and Edsell's among other things. The bearing sizes are similar to many Big Ford. tie rod ends are large, etc.
    I've seen MANY big Block cars with MII front ends under them with no issue - but you are talking another 300+ pounds so it may be a bit too much in this applicatation
     
  20. APACHE FS
    Joined: Feb 20, 2007
    Posts: 569

    APACHE FS
    Member

    I with this one^^^ that will take the weight, plus you got a lot of spring options if you need something heavier.
    See how it sits and handles, then drop the axle if needed.
    I love my dropped axle setup.


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.