Register now to get rid of these ads!

27 roadster on a 36 frame?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by steelhorse27, Jul 24, 2013.

  1. steelhorse27
    Joined: Jun 13, 2010
    Posts: 38

    steelhorse27
    Member

    I'm still in my acquiring parts phase for my 27 Roadster build and ran across a full frame and suspension (front and rear) from what I believe is a 36 ford, that I can get for a song.... I know the width and wheel base are bit different and would require a little "massaging" but has anybody used one for a T or A build? Thoughts? field frame.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jul 24, 2013
  2. steelhorse27
    Joined: Jun 13, 2010
    Posts: 38

    steelhorse27
    Member

    ...
     

    Attached Files:

  3. So-Cal Speed Sacramento
    Joined: Sep 6, 2008
    Posts: 459

    So-Cal Speed Sacramento
    Alliance Vendor
    from Sacramento

    It would take a ton of work to get the frame to fit the body or the body to fit the frame. The wheel base is different, but so is the width, shape, etc. That being said, it looks like there is a lot of usable stuff there. The front axle and rear end could be easily adaptable and if you get a set of 1932 American stamping rails, you can use the 1935-1936 center x-member to stiffen it up as well as have the trans mount, pedal mounts, etc. It isn't exactly what you need, but it's a great start!
     
  4. So-Cal Speed Sacramento
    Joined: Sep 6, 2008
    Posts: 459

    So-Cal Speed Sacramento
    Alliance Vendor
    from Sacramento

    Also, and it's hard to tell from the pics, but it looks like the stuff is 1937-1940 and probably 1939. That's good because the brakes look hydraulic rather than mechanical (totally usable) and the rear wishbones look like the 1937-1941 ones that bolt to the backing plates rather than the 1935-1936 ones that bolt to the axle bells with the spring hangers behind them. The frames, for the most part, are pretty much all the same during those years.
     

  5. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,379

    evintho
    Member

    Save the front and rear suspension and sell the frame. The frame seems to be in pretty good shape. I'm sure it'll sell quickly. Make your own frame from 2"x3" rectangular steel. The rear could be adapted but it kinda depends on what motor you're gonna run. It'd work with a hopped up flathead but a blown and injected hemi might be a bit much for it!

    I'm running the same '37-'41 front end on my 'T' roadster.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Jkustom
    Joined: Oct 8, 2002
    Posts: 1,686

    Jkustom
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Evintho, is that a 2.3 you're putting in that?
     
  7. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,413

    Paul
    Editor

    didn't Blackie Gejeian use a similar combination to build his AMBR winner?
     
  8. steelhorse27
    Joined: Jun 13, 2010
    Posts: 38

    steelhorse27
    Member

    Thanks so-cal, the guy who was mowing the grass said he thought it was a 36 but you may be right. The suspension is what caught my eye and the frame might just get thrown in on the deal.

    Evintho - I'm gonna run a 37 flattie that's already have so that rear will hopefully hold up ;). I have considered scratch building a frame or running an A frame. I wanna keep it a pre-1950 build for the most part......
     
  9. fab32
    Joined: May 14, 2002
    Posts: 13,985

    fab32
    Member Emeritus

    EVINTHO, that turbo 4cyl should make a rocket out of your '27T. Be sure to post any progress.

    Frank
     
  10. Okie Pete
    Joined: Oct 29, 2008
    Posts: 5,039

    Okie Pete
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Sounds like you are on the right track .
     
  11. mechanic58
    Joined: Mar 21, 2010
    Posts: 681

    mechanic58
    Member

    I'd like to have that "Intercooler" emblem to put on my refrigerator if you're not going to use it anymore.
     
  12. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,379

    evintho
    Member

    I'd like too but I guess I'm not allowed to post any future progress. The mods deleted my post as 'off topic'.

    Mechanic58,
    I got the I/C emblem off a Volvo at the junkyard.
     
  13. mastergun1980
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 1,094

    mastergun1980
    Member
    from Alva OK

    It looks like 39 parts based on the backing plates/wide 5 drums... SO cal is right. The rails would take a ton of work to fit your body but everything else would work great ( 33-36 front axles look very good dropped ) You could use the rails if you really put your mind to it , and could look killer and give you a very swoopy looking t ....
     
  14. mastergun1980
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 1,094

    mastergun1980
    Member
    from Alva OK

    Here's what I mean about swoopy ... This is the frame for my 41 truck. its a 42-482 car frame shortened and narrowed . You would have to cut a lot out of the turtle deck ....
    [​IMG]
     
  15. Jkustom
    Joined: Oct 8, 2002
    Posts: 1,686

    Jkustom
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I was confused about where the picture went.. Thanks mods.
     
  16. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    I'd take the center crossmember and front and rear suspention stuff, and junk everything else, I might consider using the kickup from the rails on a model a frame also
     
  17. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,355

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    I very much doubt you have this sort of build planned, but FYI quite a few "sports rods" in the 50's (some very successful) were built on post WWII frames. One of the over riding ideas on using such a wide frame was get the seating / footbox as low as possible in the car and a wide frame made that easier. But to get an early Ford body on them you had to widen the body a little, or make your own body. Cars like that often resembled Allards or early race cars, with the edges of the bodies sitting on the frame rails. Not exactly the popular track T look, but it has been done. Gary
     

    Attached Files:

  18. steelhorse27
    Joined: Jun 13, 2010
    Posts: 38

    steelhorse27
    Member

    Mastergun - yeah that might be a bit too swoopy for this one, although I am a fan of the bleed sweep

    Gary - that is nice and I can appreciate the style, just not what I want to drive. I want it to be a simple, nice, traditional type car....... I have really been inspired by these as of late
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.