Register now to get rid of these ads!

Holley 390cfm 4 barrel is it to small for my car?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by peter schmidt, Mar 18, 2013.

  1. peter schmidt
    Joined: Aug 26, 2007
    Posts: 660

    peter schmidt
    Member
    from maryland

    I'm dropping a 283 in my Hudson it is backed by a th 400 trans. The motor is said to be .030 over and has an edelbrock performer intake and a hei distributer as far as I know it's a stock cam and heads will be running the stock exhaust manifolds and 2 1/2 inch dual exhaust with turbo mufflers the motor is out of a 1965 Chevelle I just want to know if this will be too small of a carb to run on this motor it's a Holley 390cfm 4 barrel vacume advance. Of would I be better off with a Rochester 2 barrel I can get the rebuild kit for the Holley for 33 and the 2 barrel for pretty much the same price that's supposed to be good to go.
     
  2. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    Use the Holley. Good street combo with the rest of the engine. A tad bigger wouldn't hurt, but wouldn't run any better, just maybe a bit more power at higher revs, not necessary in a cruiser.
     
  3. henryj1951
    Joined: Sep 23, 2012
    Posts: 2,306

    henryj1951
    Member
    from USA

    i bet this carb is small
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGClulA96K8

    :cool:
     
  4. henryj1951
    Joined: Sep 23, 2012
    Posts: 2,306

    henryj1951
    Member
    from USA

    keep the holley
     

  5. bdynpnt
    Joined: Feb 9, 2009
    Posts: 354

    bdynpnt
    Member

    I raced an asphalt latemodel and we had to run a 390 holley per the rules and it worked fine on a 600 hp 358 c.i. Ford engine should work fine on the 283
     
  6. peter schmidt
    Joined: Aug 26, 2007
    Posts: 660

    peter schmidt
    Member
    from maryland

    Ok I was worried because all the cfm calculators I used said 450-550
     
  7. Keep the 390, tell everyone it's an 850.
     
  8. raengines
    Joined: Nov 6, 2010
    Posts: 227

    raengines
    Member
    from pa.

    390 will be fine
     
  9. I was worried when you said it was a "vacume advance" model.....but it will be fine with vacuum secondaries too
     
  10. peter schmidt
    Joined: Aug 26, 2007
    Posts: 660

    peter schmidt
    Member
    from maryland

    Yes vacuum secondaries had a brain fart I guess lol
     
  11. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    On a near stock 283, the 390 CFM Holley sounds about perfect to me. Go for it.
    Mart3406
    ============
     
  12. Used one for yrs on a mild 283 in my 57. Ran like a champ and good economy too.

    Use it imo.

    Rat
     
  13. Diavolo
    Joined: Apr 1, 2009
    Posts: 824

    Diavolo
    Member

    A 600 cfm vac secondary would be my first choice but a 390 vac. sec. will be just fine. My basic calculation is 2(cid)(.75) where .75 is efficiency. By this I get 424.5 cfm. You aren't missing a whole lot from 390 to there so your carb will work to it's full capacity and you will get good economy too.

    If your engine was ported, headers, intake, etc. I would bump the efficiency up but a mostly stock engine gets .75 as a starting point. Case in point is my flathead 2(239)(.75)= 358.5. Add a cam intake and .040 bore and a 390 carb is just about perfect, just like for yours.
     
  14. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,593

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    If you have it, run it. The 4GCs and WCFBs that Chevrolet put on the 283 power pack engines didn't flow any more than that. People tend to overcarburate just as much as they tend to overcam....maybe more, since it's easier to change the carburetor. Don't pick a carb that's going to work better than the 390 one tenth of one percent of the total time you're driving it.
     
  15. Buckle
    Joined: Feb 17, 2005
    Posts: 380

    Buckle
    Member

    I bet it will run fine, I'd use it

    Buckle
     
  16. TomWar
    Joined: Jun 11, 2006
    Posts: 727

    TomWar
    Member

    I use one on my 84 El Camino 305/700R4 and it works just fine and gets decent MPG.
     
  17. Wardog
    Joined: Jan 12, 2010
    Posts: 2,438

    Wardog
    Member

    My calculations say you already have a 390 so instead of spending cash on a 450-550 I'd run what ya got. 450-550 is not that big of a step up.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.