Register now to get rid of these ads!

Features The Ugliest Kustoms of the 50s

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by Jive-Bomber, Feb 21, 2013.

  1. Lytles Garage
    Joined: May 6, 2011
    Posts: 621

    Lytles Garage
    Member

    " The ugliest Kustoms of the 50s" Most ,if not all of them!!! Chris
     
  2. hotrodmano
    Joined: May 3, 2011
    Posts: 412

    hotrodmano
    Member
    from Norway

    [​IMG]

    As you all probably know, the Packard brand was on the brink at the time, and the double headlight treatment was, as one can see in the picture, just a bucket over the single headlighted 57 fenders. And the Packard was, more or less, a modified Studebaker. Talk about facelift and squeezing out the last drops :D
     
  3. johnod
    Joined: Aug 18, 2009
    Posts: 799

    johnod
    Member

    Studebaker bought Packard,and Studebaker itself was going through some rough times.
    As a result they produced cars, in both lines with these tacked on parts, fins, headlight treatments etc.
    Making for SOME, not all, really ugly cars in my opinion, and I'm a Stude owner.:)
     
  4. hotrodmano
    Joined: May 3, 2011
    Posts: 412

    hotrodmano
    Member
    from Norway

    Theres just something really wrong with this car

    [​IMG]
     
  5. Not as wrong as this one...
     

    Attached Files:

  6. the-rodster
    Joined: Jul 2, 2003
    Posts: 6,945

    the-rodster
    Member



    This was a production vehicle.

    1955-57 Gaylord.

    Gaylord Cars, Ltd, Chicago, only 3 were built.

    Hemi powered, hand built german body.

    Rich
     
  7. hotrodmano
    Joined: May 3, 2011
    Posts: 412

    hotrodmano
    Member
    from Norway

    [​IMG]

    Luckily:p
     
  8. Tom davison
    Joined: Mar 15, 2008
    Posts: 6,042

    Tom davison
    Member
    from Phoenix AZ

    I believe that Bob Larivee's Stiletto is one of the cleanest and simplest designs built during the so-called "Showrod" era.

    But I also felt that the front wheels blew the deal and that one or two front wheels should have been hidden from view, as Photoshopped here.

    I also adjusted the color to more accurately repesent the actual shade of pearl lime green in it was painted.

    [​IMG]
     
  9. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    very punny...:D
     
  10. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,659

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    Let's not forget the Mohs Ostentatienne Opera Sedan, built by the Mohs Seaplane Corporation of Madison, Wisconsin in 1967.

    Built by Bruce Mohs on an International Harvester chassis, it was supposed to be the ultimate safety car with guard rails down the sides and entrance from the rear. It was offered for sale but I doubt anybody bought one.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. V4F
    Joined: Aug 8, 2008
    Posts: 4,382

    V4F
    Member
    from middle ca.

    in all fairness , the 50's was a learning time . lots of experimentation . the 40's were very basic & the 50's were a learning error . i learned in the 50's/60's by the seat of my pants ............... love the older errors
     
  12. This will have to be my last entry in the Thread.....Car guys will always recognize the freedom and the excitement that living in America has provided over the last 60 years or so in living the Dream of building or enjoying Custom Cars. Whether Beautiful or Butt-Ugly, we've enjoyed a Freedom few Nations have ever had. I doubt we'll ever see a Somalian or Ukrainian Kustom Kar Thread anytime soon......We have been afforded treasure beyond measure in having the ability to own, build, buy or sell any kind of automobile we wanted, limited only by dollars or imagination. I'm so thankful to have had that opportunity.......Centurion9.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. cosmic12
    Joined: Oct 16, 2011
    Posts: 422

    cosmic12
    Member

    Amen, and I love that car the way it was intended to be.
     
  14. Im fully aware that the cars i posted arent "Kustom" but isnt this a thread of opinion? The Del Mar ive tried to see its beauty but i just cant. As far as the Le Sabre. I like it............... until i see the front end. Thats the only thing i dont like about it. But like i said, its just my opinion.
     
  15. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,661

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    It's the front end of many of these cars where things get too wild for me. '50s cars had some beautiful front ends, tough to improve upon.
     
  16. Maybe I should have added a smiley face.
     
  17. Ken Hanson
    Joined: Aug 27, 2006
    Posts: 3

    Ken Hanson
    Member

    Thank God somebody has finally said it. There were a lot of cool customs in the 50's and 60's and then there were a lot of stupid looking cars too. And they were produced by big names. I thought I was crazy and so did a lot of people when I called those cars stupid when I was a kid. I finally feel justified after 50 years. Thanks guys. Now I can cancel my next therapy session.
     
  18. retiredblue
    Joined: Mar 1, 2010
    Posts: 272

    retiredblue
    Member
    from california

    I have to agree with Centurion 9 - when these cars were built- it reflected a time in our country when nothing was impossible or out of reach- when you were only limited by your own limitations- freedom - not like today- sorry off the soap box-
     
  19. Saxon
    Joined: Aug 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,155

    Saxon
    Member
    from MN

    I thought this was an interesting video.

    <iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BC1-n_Nb1lA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
     
  20. Not to mention taste...
     
  21. Sanford Graham
    Joined: Apr 9, 2009
    Posts: 89

    Sanford Graham
    Member

    Whew ! What a waste of a 58 Impala..............sandy
     
  22. Dreddybear
    Joined: Mar 31, 2007
    Posts: 6,089

    Dreddybear
    Member

  23. JakeDW
    Joined: Sep 30, 2012
    Posts: 580

    JakeDW
    Member
    from Missouri

    I always thought the family truckster was sweet.lol


    Jake
     

    Attached Files:

  24. pwschuh
    Joined: Oct 27, 2008
    Posts: 2,832

    pwschuh
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Mohs Opera Sedan was not a custom, but I'd LOVE to have one.
     
  25. gibraltar72
    Joined: Jan 21, 2011
    Posts: 260

    gibraltar72
    Member
    from Osseo Mi.

    Being old enough to remember those days I have to tell you an awful lot of these cars that showed such excess were made that way in stages. I remember that the show circuits used to always want something different so cars weren't allowed to stay the same. As I recall cars weren't allowed to be shown the same way year to year the promoters made them make I believe at least 15 changes before they were allowed back on the circuit the next year. Some of these cars were perfect customs in their first showing but then had to be changed in major ways to stay on tour. Make 15 changes to a perfect car for four years and you end up with a monstrosity in lots of cases. Lots of these cars existed only for show purposes so they served very well for the purpose they were intended for. I'm not offended by them someone took a leap they were the only ones that had to be pleased in the end. I enjoy them for what they were or what they became!
     
  26. UniqueCollector
    Joined: Jan 15, 2013
    Posts: 74

    UniqueCollector
    Member

    I know I am young but those classics of the 50's were pretty sweet not ugly.
    If you want to talk ugly lets look at all the modern cars now days.
    They are alot worse then the cars in this fourm.
    I would take any of these over what is build now days with these modern cars that are made out of fiberglass.
    True steel is better
     
  27. Greasemachine
    Joined: Feb 3, 2007
    Posts: 153

    Greasemachine
    Member
    from San Diego

    That Trend book Restyle is from 1952. It tries to explain basics of proportion and design. If you ever find it, buy it! It explains it all with the eye from back of the early 50's.
    The whole thing is like evolution, people in the 40's, 50's 60's experimented with different ideas and at the end we have the style everybody is copy's today over and over, till people get tired of that look and starting to appreciate the more experimental design again. Hope that makes sense.
     

    Attached Files:

  28. BRYANSAYER
    Joined: Jan 11, 2008
    Posts: 78

    BRYANSAYER
    Member

    HATERS GONNA HATE! fyi just because you shaved your door handles and sprayed metal flake on your roof doesn't make it a custom.
     
  29. Ran across this today...
     

    Attached Files:

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.