Register now to get rid of these ads!

who can id this Chevrolet engine?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by belgiumcustomshop, Feb 24, 2013.

  1. belgiumcustomshop
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 195

    belgiumcustomshop
    Member
    from belgium

    I have this chevy 6cil engine laying in my shop for a long time now, I remember the last owner say its a pick up engine from the 50's
    Some ideas?

    [​IMG]
    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    [​IMG]
    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    [​IMG]
    Uploaded with ImageShack.us
     
  2. Steve Ray
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 693

    Steve Ray
    Member

    Last edited: Feb 24, 2013
  3. USA Tires Sign Joe
    Joined: Aug 13, 2006
    Posts: 1,072

    USA Tires Sign Joe
    Member
    from Western NJ

    Looks just like the stock six banger I took out of my ol' '55 Chevy Belair.
     

    Attached Files:

  4. rtomss
    Joined: Jan 9, 2009
    Posts: 242

    rtomss
    Member

    Yup...that's an early 235 from a truck. It has the truck bell housing.
     

  5. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    Two-bolt valve cover is '54 0r older.
     
  6. p15-1948
    Joined: Sep 10, 2010
    Posts: 44

    p15-1948
    Member

    May not be a full pressure system. Pretty sure 53 car manual shifts still used the dippers and auto's were full pressure. Have in my head all trucks in 53 were still dippers.
     
  7. Shadetree
    Joined: Feb 7, 2003
    Posts: 243

    Shadetree
    Member
    from Va USA

    see the little triangle plate below the intake! and the short side cover below the spark plugs.
    I believe it is a 235 dipper engine "not full pressure"
     
  8. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,592

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    It looks like a 1950 to 53 235 with splash oiling like a 216,the 41-9 235s had the same tall side cover as the 216.
     
  9. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    If it has 18 head bolts it's a 53 only splash oil 235 car engine ?
     
  10. waldo53
    Joined: Jan 26, 2010
    Posts: 863

    waldo53
    Member
    from ID

    It's fer sure a splash oiler as was pointed out above - the triangular plate just under the exhuast flange is the oil distributor cover, only used on the splasher. Looks to be a '53 by the date code, probably a 235 - but if you can post the numbers that are stamped on that flat pad, just behind the distributor, we can tell you more.
     
  11. belgiumcustomshop
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 195

    belgiumcustomshop
    Member
    from belgium

    thanks for the reactions. Here are the engine numbers: CON 4 F93 and 3701946 and the head:

    B10 887
    066
    570
     
  12. RawDeal
    Joined: Nov 29, 2002
    Posts: 160

    RawDeal
    Member
    from Austria

    yes its a 235 from 1953
     
  13. belgiumcustomshop
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 195

    belgiumcustomshop
    Member
    from belgium

    thanks for the reactions.
     
  14. Snarl
    Joined: Feb 16, 2007
    Posts: 1,639

    Snarl
    Member

    splash oil '53 235.

    date code F93 is June 9, 1953.

    Stamped code next to distributor would be more specific.

    If you didn't know the date code:
    It has the 3 bolt side mount (used '52-54), short side cover (not used on 216), and it has the oil distribution cover, which makes it a splash oiler ('53 or older). All that would narrow it down to a '52-53 splash 235.
     
  15. Dan Timberlake
    Joined: Apr 28, 2010
    Posts: 1,533

    Dan Timberlake
    Member

    Always thought it was interesting manufacturers felt it was easier /cheaper to manufacture, fit and assemble the troughs and what not than drill a few holes in the crank.
    In the transition years I can picture they were just " using up " older inventory.
     
  16. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,592

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    I can never figure out the splash oiling theory,a couple minutes more in the crank drilling jig and a little more time machining the rods and it would have been a full pressure motor.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.