Register now to get rid of these ads!

single leaf gasser vs parallel leafs

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by v8nova64, Nov 13, 2012.

  1. v8nova64
    Joined: Jun 4, 2011
    Posts: 134

    v8nova64
    Member
    from !!

    delete
     
    Last edited: May 22, 2013
  2. 500 single
    Joined: Jul 8, 2006
    Posts: 119

    500 single
    Member

    I think you're going to have to pick either "works better" or "looks cooler". You won't get both.
     
  3. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 8,759

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    Parallel leafs work better when you start getting the nose up in the air.
     
  4. kwoodyh
    Joined: Apr 11, 2006
    Posts: 641

    kwoodyh
    Member

    Parallel will work the best for your application.
     

  5. 50dodge4x4
    Joined: Aug 7, 2004
    Posts: 3,534

    50dodge4x4
    Member


    ^^^I agree. ^^^

    The transverse spring looks goofy on a raised car, in my opinion.
    Gene
     
  6. Ghost28
    Joined: Nov 23, 2008
    Posts: 3,200

    Ghost28
    Member

    And they look better, and in my opinion look stronger on a gasser
     
  7. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,659

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    Parallel leafs work better. That is why 99% of car makers used them. Transverse leaf is cheaper ( you pay for 1 spring instead of 2). That is why Ford used them.
     
  8. rustang
    Joined: Sep 10, 2009
    Posts: 710

    rustang
    Member

    ^^^^ +1
     
  9. How heavy is the car?, the cross leaf doesn't work as well as a parallel setup in a heavier car.
     
  10. With the user name I would think it's a Nova,,,I believe the parallel springs would handle and drive better with the nose in the air. HRP
     
  11. check-out how manufactures of frt clips do it. How thick is thick -walled tubing and your 1/2" thick mounting flange is too heavy and you will have to run from the top mounts on the firewall to the front of the lower rails. there have been several nova's built on this forum do a search to see how they did it, will save you some headaches
     
  12. II FUNNY
    Joined: Jul 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,838

    II FUNNY
    Member

    I ran 2x4x.125 wall tube when I built mine, but I don't think that 2" square tube would be a problem as long as you triangulate it to the upper factory firewall mounts.
    [​IMG]
     
  13. II FUNNY
    Joined: Jul 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,838

    II FUNNY
    Member

    This one is from the first instant funny car the Bill Thomas "NOVEL NOVA"
    [​IMG]
     
  14. II FUNNY
    Joined: Jul 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,838

    II FUNNY
    Member

    There a few more pics in my profile. I would have gladly done some measuring except that I sold it this past summer.
     
  15. 296moon
    Joined: Oct 24, 2007
    Posts: 662

    296moon
    Member
    from england

  16. 296 V8
    Joined: Sep 17, 2003
    Posts: 4,666

    296 V8
    BANNED
    from Nor~Cal

    yeah one spring looks dumb and who would want 30lb's less on the nose.
     

    Attached Files:

  17. 296 V8
    Joined: Sep 17, 2003
    Posts: 4,666

    296 V8
    BANNED
    from Nor~Cal

    Shackles in the rear are preferred if you haven’t mounted anything yet.
    Shackles in front need to angle forward … the ones in the photo are bound up and wrong.
     
  18. 296 V8
    Joined: Sep 17, 2003
    Posts: 4,666

    296 V8
    BANNED
    from Nor~Cal

    Easiest way to describe it here?
    They should angle the opposite of the ones in the photo.
    The ones in the photo are likely to flip up under the right conditions

    Adding leaves will only change the shackle angle if they change the arch of the main leaf … more arch = shorter eye to eye dimension.
     
  19. kennkat
    Joined: Aug 25, 2011
    Posts: 1,385

    kennkat
    Member

    I hope you do not mind... Here is your photo crudely "photo shopped" into what I see as the proper shackle angle.... :)
     

    Attached Files:

  20. kennkat
    Joined: Aug 25, 2011
    Posts: 1,385

    kennkat
    Member

    Yes, you got it..:)
     
  21. 296 V8
    Joined: Sep 17, 2003
    Posts: 4,666

    296 V8
    BANNED
    from Nor~Cal

    If its all new stuff ?
    Id go for just a bit past vertical …. You will be adding weight and springs will settle / flatten a bit
     
  22. kennkat
    Joined: Aug 25, 2011
    Posts: 1,385

    kennkat
    Member

    Yes, I was speaking of the Fully Loaded angle, new springs may be slightly less, as stated .:D:D:D
     
  23. SmokinBill
    Joined: Sep 18, 2009
    Posts: 849

    SmokinBill
    Member

    Here's a good shot of before and after weight loaded on spring and shackle
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  24. 296 V8
    Joined: Sep 17, 2003
    Posts: 4,666

    296 V8
    BANNED
    from Nor~Cal

    v8nova64

    Are you Elvis38 on the other site?
     
  25. rustang
    Joined: Sep 10, 2009
    Posts: 710

    rustang
    Member

    Mine is pretty close to what SmokinBill has in his picture....When i initially set mine up I had more angle than what I liked when all the weight was on the front (I would stand on the front bumper and bounce the springs would just touch the bumpstops) this was the shackels at 45 deg...my front frame rails tilt down slightly...

    What I did was take the springs out and a 1/2" of more arch put in them and it solved the problem (if you could call it one).... shoot for about 30 deg. and you will be golden with those small speedway style shackels....
    Tom
     
  26. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 8,759

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    I wouldn't go 45 degrees loaded. I'd go something past straight up, but maybe 10-15 degrees, so you have plenty of movement and the shackle wont flop over against the frame.
    If you start straight up like Smokin Bill's Nova, and have stiff enough springs it will settle to about perfect. But if the springs are too soft then you need to even be a bit less than straight up to end up perfect. A BBC might also create a bit more weight, and settle more too, so if you can just weight the frontend with your engine, or enough static weight, then you can tack things together and see how it all sits.
    You never did mention what wall thickness your 2" round tube is. Wall thickness, type of material, etc. will all determine if it's stout enough. If you're going to use typical Nova firewall braces also, then that factors in too. Might be easier to determine if 2" OD tube is enough if you could answer the questions, and maybe show how you're bracing it all to make the subframe.
     
  27. langy
    Joined: Apr 27, 2006
    Posts: 5,730

    langy
    Member Emeritus

    If you mean the axle yes but 1/4" thick wall seamless
     
  28. langy
    Joined: Apr 27, 2006
    Posts: 5,730

    langy
    Member Emeritus

    60 dgrees would be better in my opinion
     
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2012
  29. 30 lbs less for the spring but add the weight of two hairpins so your are even again.

    We have guys with both types and both types get down the 1/4 mi. in the 10's


    [​IMG]
     
  30. Lytles Garage
    Joined: May 6, 2011
    Posts: 621

    Lytles Garage
    Member

    With a transverse spring, you can kick the front wheels out a couple of inches without the front springs sticking out past the bumper. Chris
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.