Register now to get rid of these ads!

40 Ford Pickup Project. I need advice.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by MigMan, Oct 5, 2012.

  1. MigMan
    Joined: Jun 29, 2011
    Posts: 3

    MigMan
    Member

    I recently found a 40 for pickup that had been stored in a barn for years that I picked up cheap. It is all original but the flathead and tranny are gone but the front end and banjo rear diff with torque tube are all there. The body is covered with surface rust and the frame is shot. I found a new 40 frame with a Mustang II front suspension already installed to replace it. The new frame had a 289 in it but I was told it was now configured for a 350. I am going to go look at it tomorrow and see what I think. Here is my problem I need your advise with.. Should I buy the frame and put a 350 in it like everyone else like it is set up for or can I use a 302 instead without moving the mounts? I found a 80 Ford F-100 with a 302 newly rebuilt carb and a rebuilt transmission for $500.00. It also has a 9 inch rear end as well. I know the rear end will have to be shortened to use it but for the price I am not sure I can pass it up. I can scrape the truck after I take the parts I need and get a few hundred dollar back. Also it would be a Ford in a Ford which is rare these days everyone runs Chevy 350's. I know the body is going to need a lot of work and patching and I may be getting ahead of myself but this deal just kind of fell in my lap. Any advice would be appreciated. Here are some pics. I know it looks bad but it has promise I think. After all what do you expect for $500.00. I have the cab, bed, doors, front fenders, rear fenders, and hood. It needs a frame and a grill the deluxe it came with will not work.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. 40Standard
    Joined: Jul 30, 2005
    Posts: 5,963

    40Standard
    Member
    from Indy

    go with a SBC they fit well
     
  3. hotrod40coupe
    Joined: Apr 8, 2007
    Posts: 2,561

    hotrod40coupe
    Member

    Small Block Chevy's were designed to fit in '40 Fords.
     
  4. Go with the 302, I did and mine fit real well with the AOD. I get so many comments about it being nice to see a Ford in a Ford.

    Later

    Eric
     

  5. I have a '40, and a '41 both have Flatheads in them, so apparently not "everyone runs Chevy 350's".
    Pretty sure there are more out there.
     
  6. manyolcars
    Joined: Mar 30, 2001
    Posts: 9,187

    manyolcars

    There are many good reasons to use a smallblock chevy and the most important two are Money and it's traditional.. If you are wealthy you can go with an offbrand engine
     
  7. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    I have a 302/5.0 and AOD in my '40 Sedan Delivery with MII front suspension - fits very nicely with no hacking of firewall thank you very much - why go with a Chevy? It's a Ford darn it....;)

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    I guess Small Block Chevys in a Ford are not baaaaad....

    [​IMG]
     
  9. modelamotorhead
    Joined: Dec 24, 2011
    Posts: 487

    modelamotorhead
    Member

    Seems you have a good handle on the sbf for $500, it's not a big deal to change out the chevy engine mounts that are in the frame for ford mounts. I'd go with the F-100 engine if it checks out OK. Nothing wrong with a chevy either. If you can find one for around $500 with a tranny like the Ford F-100 sbf, go with it. Parts for the chevy are cheaper/easier to obtain. Apples and oranges ya know?....
     
  10. Old Dude
    Joined: May 12, 2006
    Posts: 193

    Old Dude
    Member

    I have a 289 Ford-C 4 Trans. in my '41 Ford Pick Up. You need to offset firewall 2 to 2 & half inches, according to how you are setting up Cooling system. I get a lot of good compliments. Good Luck
     

    Attached Files:

    • 446.jpg
      446.jpg
      File size:
      439.6 KB
      Views:
      129
  11. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    Use a shorty water pump on the 302, locate the radiator as far forward as you can and you should not have to modify firewall at all....
     
  12. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,903

    need louvers ?
    Member

    I personally wouldn't put a small block Ford into something that came with a small block Ford... Do the Chevy and make life easy.
     
  13. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    [​IMG]
     
  14. XWYNNSGUY
    Joined: Dec 7, 2008
    Posts: 105

    XWYNNSGUY
    Member

    No disrespect to anyone or anyones car or choice of engine. ANYTHING but a 350 chevy, put that ford in it!!!! Just me
     
  15. Weasel's second post was so cool that I forgot what the thread was about.
     
  16. The sheep and their SBC!!!:D
     
  17. I have a 327 in mine and there is plenty of room even for a/c and power steering and battery.
     
  18. TheEngineer
    Joined: Jul 17, 2012
    Posts: 239

    TheEngineer
    Member
    from New Mexico

    Use the ford. I bet you could double your money parting out small shipable parts on eBay. Vent windows, tail lights, door handles, hood hinges, window regulators, ash tray, steering column, and other small hard to find items. It'll add up. You can store that stuff in the attic while you wait for a buyer and you can still scrap the truck for about $350 when you're done gutting it.
     
  19. If you can find a '41 pickup front crossmember, that will help with putting in a SBF. The '41 pickups had a deeper front crossmember because that was the first year Ford offered a 6 cylinder option.
     
  20. slobroy
    Joined: Jun 22, 2009
    Posts: 360

    slobroy
    Member

    If the new frame is set up for mtII the only concern would be oil pan clearance issues with a front sump oil pan. If the truck engine has the same oil pan set up like the early broncos you should be ok, But I have a flathead in mine with a t5.
     
  21. joel
    Joined: Oct 10, 2009
    Posts: 2,481

    joel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'd use the 302 etc. if you get the aftermarket frame/MII combo. If you have to go back to an original frame the 302 is still viable, but more work/ mods. to do. The FH/T5 is good but will be the most expensive in the long run, JMHO.
     
  22. Ice man
    Joined: Mar 12, 2008
    Posts: 983

    Ice man
    Member

    With a Ford 302 the dizzy in in front and thats handy, and the 302 just sounds better. LOL. Iceman
     
  23. n847
    Joined: Apr 22, 2010
    Posts: 2,724

    n847
    Member

    This is a pointless post...Obviously you know this will be controversial topic. It sounds like you know your too cool for a SBC any way. More importantly if switching from SBC to SBF engine mounts are your throwing you for a loop than how do you hope to perform this whole frame swap?

    What do you want us to say...Use what ever motor you like! I'd say if you want to be a hard ass about it then take it back to a flat head. If your changing to a later model engine series then does it really matter chevy, ford, or mopar?

    Sorry I'm probably just venting but I get sick of people asking a theoretical question just to stir up shit! The 302 is a great motor, as are most all of the SBC's. But you clearly know what you want to do now get out and do it!
     
  24. MigMan
    Joined: Jun 29, 2011
    Posts: 3

    MigMan
    Member

    Well after much thought and recommendations I have decided to go with the 302 and put a ford back in the ford. The new frame I bought us already boxed and changing the mounts should be easy. I have next owned a ford so this will be a first for me. I plan on using the short water pump and moving the motor as far forward as possible to keep from cutting my firewall. Thanks to everyone for their opinions. I have a 350 in my 36 Plymouth and had planned on the same but the available parts at a cheap price for the moment helped with my decision.
     
  25. 2935ford
    Joined: Jan 6, 2006
    Posts: 3,843

    2935ford
    Member

    I about fell off my chair with this....funny GREAT!
     
  26. austinhunt
    Joined: Nov 26, 2011
    Posts: 533

    austinhunt
    Member

    Listen here.

    Use the stock frame, front, and rear. It will make you happy later that you left something really cool on there that cost you only a small amount to rebuild with no fab work.

    Dont go sbc or sbf!

    I screwed up and rebuilt a sbf (which is cool I think) but for gods sake, find a flatty!

    You can find a running (near stock) flathead with all the money you save not changing front end, steering, ford water pumps and pulleys, oil pans, custom drive shaft, shortened axles for a 9 inch.... the list goes on. Trust me... I just did EGGZACHARY what you are about to. minus MII..
     
  27. austinhunt
    Joined: Nov 26, 2011
    Posts: 533

    austinhunt
    Member

    Darn, I didnt see page 2 during my hissy fit....Well, pm me if you need advise on the 302.

    I played the ford mix and match game... it hurts every time.

    Please excuse the temporary valve covers:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  28. aldixie
    Joined: May 28, 2008
    Posts: 1,662

    aldixie
    Member

    I have a 302 mounted in my 40. Fits well but you do have to recess the firewall a couple of inches. I also had to use a remote oil filter as the Mustang II top hat was in the way.
     
  29. mastergun1980
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 1,094

    mastergun1980
    Member
    from Alva OK

    I would totally go sbf...
     
  30. spiders web
    Joined: Jan 16, 2011
    Posts: 387

    spiders web
    Member

    Put a chevy in and paint it yellow. Then pin stripe it and scroll the words on the back that say "The lemon lemming". How can you even ask the question for !#@&# sake. Its one of Henrys finest automobiles with lines that drip with pure brilliance and your considering anything other than an oval engine then you should burn in Hot Rod Hell!!!!!! Just say'in
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.