Register now to get rid of these ads!

49' in progress

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 1fineline, Jan 9, 2012.

  1. 1fineline
    Joined: Feb 17, 2009
    Posts: 39

    1fineline
    Member

    Just thought I'd post a pic of my 49' Ford, as it sits so far, I'd like to hear comments and suggestions. Thanks!
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Somehow, It looks shorter than 49 ft. But VERY nice.
     
  3. Iron Dog
    Joined: Oct 28, 2011
    Posts: 267

    Iron Dog
    Member
    from Minnesota

    Wow, that will be a unique look. Thumb's up!
     
  4. Old&Low
    Joined: Mar 13, 2010
    Posts: 410

    Old&Low
    Member

    Awesome idea on the 'double' 1/4 panel; looks great!
     

  5. 51 Leadsled
    Joined: Nov 23, 2007
    Posts: 960

    51 Leadsled
    Member
    from NC

    I like t o see a view from the rear. I love the profile, looks great!
     
  6. jerseymike
    Joined: Sep 25, 2008
    Posts: 707

    jerseymike
    Member

    just curious how your gonna carry that body line further up the door. trying to picture the whole length of the car.
     
  7. 1fineline
    Joined: Feb 17, 2009
    Posts: 39

    1fineline
    Member

    Couple more pics, probably a rolled pan for rear, or some kustom bumperettes.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. ironandsteele
    Joined: Apr 25, 2006
    Posts: 5,924

    ironandsteele
    Member

    Wow. Looks amazing.
     
  9. 117harv
    Joined: Nov 12, 2009
    Posts: 6,589

    117harv
    Member

    I really like it:)
     
  10. 1fineline
    Joined: Feb 17, 2009
    Posts: 39

    1fineline
    Member

    Just a pic of a build we found online, liked the chop, so taped the picture up, kinda as a visual reference, he didn't list measurements, but we went 4" in front, and about 5 1/8 in rear, looks just right to me!
     
  11. I like the took, but the doubled up quarters are way too wide IMHO. A swage line as wide as on the 49 Merc would be just the job I think. Even run it the length of the car. Just my 2c.
     
  12. 1fineline
    Joined: Feb 17, 2009
    Posts: 39

    1fineline
    Member

    Trying to stay pre 1964, and stick with all Ford, or Merc parts for the build. Will be using a modern 302, Ford aod, and a mustang II front , however. Its got to be driven, not no trailer queen!
     
  13. swissmike
    Joined: Oct 22, 2003
    Posts: 1,297

    swissmike
    Member

    I agree with James D, they stick out too far. I am also curious how you want to finish off the quarters. I applaud your courage to do something different!
     
  14. Berky
    Joined: Feb 4, 2006
    Posts: 403

    Berky
    Member

    I agree with others that the sides stick out too far. I feel it will also look odd with the taillights staggered and so far apart.
     
  15. 1fineline
    Joined: Feb 17, 2009
    Posts: 39

    1fineline
    Member

    I will try to get some pics from behind the car later this afternoon, the skirts are the look we were going for, wanted a full "bubble" look, kinda like a '53 Merc. Should come together real nice, as time goes on.
     
  16. riseabove_xxx
    Joined: Dec 3, 2010
    Posts: 219

    riseabove_xxx
    Member
    from Michigan

    so badass!
    I cant wait to see it rolling.
     
  17. choppedmerc
    Joined: Feb 18, 2009
    Posts: 95

    choppedmerc
    Member
    from Spokane

    I like the stacked staggered taillights! but might need to bring the quarter inward abit so that there isnt such a step out on the quarter and also so the taillights are not quit so staggered. very interesting idea!
     
  18. Here´s what you got me thinking when I saw this.
    (not sure whose car this is, but it had a similar chop)

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Jan 9, 2012
  19. Olustee Bus
    Joined: Jan 8, 2008
    Posts: 167

    Olustee Bus
    Member

    I am not real big on chopped or custom but that is going to be a fine looking car.
     
  20. chaos10meter
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 2,191

    chaos10meter
    Member
    from PA.

    Not feeling the dbl. quarter panel but fine looking work on that.
     
  21. Jalopy Joker
    Joined: Sep 3, 2006
    Posts: 31,262

    Jalopy Joker
    Member

    now that is "laying frame" in concrete , rather than just "laying frame" in the grass. looks like quality work. keep us posted with more pics
     
  22. I look forward to seeing how you are going to run that second body line into the door as well. I think that will make or break how well you pull this off.
     
  23. 1fineline
    Joined: Feb 17, 2009
    Posts: 39

    1fineline
    Member

    Few more pics dosent look the same sittin up on the rotisserie!
     

    Attached Files:

  24. resqd37Zep
    Joined: Aug 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,216

    resqd37Zep
    Member
    from Nor Cal

    Dude I dig it! Keep it up.
     
  25. 49 feet...... It took me a minute, but i got it. HaHa! Car looks crazy, but I like it.
     
  26. 1fineline
    Joined: Feb 17, 2009
    Posts: 39

    1fineline
    Member

    Ya, I'm an oil field worker, and car guy, not an English teacher. Sorry fo
    r the punctuation and spelling errors!
     
  27. thesupersized
    Joined: Aug 22, 2004
    Posts: 1,367

    thesupersized
    Member

    you asked for comments.....honestly, i think its a terrible idea and think you should cut the extra quarter panel off.
     
  28. You asked. I like the look of the dual tail light spears, gives the side profile, a unique look. Not liking the rear profile. I would think loose the top tail light, bring down the rear quarter at that point-following the top of trunk line, using only your new lower tail lights. Of course, that would render the upper tail light spear not necessary. I like your metal work, and the idea, that you are building something unique. Good luck on your project.
     
  29. Rikster
    Joined: Dec 10, 2004
    Posts: 5,795

    Rikster
    Member

    Does not look good to me at all.
    The added bottom piece is WAY to wide, and the radius is way to soft to look good on this otherwise very nice Custom.
    To me it looks like something went terribly wrong along the line.
    Something like this could work, but it needs to be far less wide, and the radius where the added bottom piece meets the rest of the body needs to be much sharper... at least thats what I would do.
     
  30. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 9,914

    BJR
    Member

    Can't say as I like the double fender look. It looks like someone just slapped another set of fenders on the side just because they could. Doesn't flow or ad anything positive to the lines of the total car. But what do I know. Nice metalwork though.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.