Register now to get rid of these ads!

HELP needed with picking a new power plant for the 37 Packard.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 1twisted1, Dec 29, 2011.

  1. 1twisted1
    Joined: Nov 26, 2011
    Posts: 184

    1twisted1
    Member

    Well I bring home the new ride this weekend. :D:D The first thing I plan on doing to it is removing the original dive line ( in-line 6,trans and rear axle) and storing them away for safe keeping. This is wear all the experts on here come in to play. I do not want to do the same old thing and replace it with a small/big block so I'm going to use a in-line six. I feel this will be different and some what keep the look of the original motor. I think i want to use one of the following the 225, 292 or if i can locate one a 302. what are the pros and cons these motors and is there a better motor that i should be thinking of?

    thanks in advance.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Dec 29, 2011
  2. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,222

    F&J
    Member

    Ford 300 std shift
     
  3. nfleone
    Joined: Nov 14, 2011
    Posts: 46

    nfleone
    Member

    AMC 4 liter six. Is that different enough? LOL

    Nick
     
  4. 1twisted1
    Joined: Nov 26, 2011
    Posts: 184

    1twisted1
    Member


    NICE never thought of that one!!!!
     
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2011

  5. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,222

    F&J
    Member

    that would be just as good as the ford 300
     
  6. GaryB
    Joined: Dec 19, 2008
    Posts: 3,529

    GaryB
    Member
    from Reno,nv

    glad to see you got that car,one cool ride.I think if you could find a 302,some go fast parts ,nice 5spd,9"rear.you be stylin
     
  7. 1twisted1
    Joined: Nov 26, 2011
    Posts: 184

    1twisted1
    Member

    Thanks GrayB you got it right but i'll be using a 10 bolt because thats what the air rides set up for.
     
  8. 85930tudor
    Joined: Dec 22, 2010
    Posts: 18

    85930tudor
    Member

    yes the amc 4.0 high output!
     
  9. 1twisted1
    Joined: Nov 26, 2011
    Posts: 184

    1twisted1
    Member

    well thats 2 vote for the 4.0L now

    does anybody have some seat of the pants feedback on my motor choices??
     
  10. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 6,951

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Given the 20% less displacement and the lack of available speed equipment. I don't think so. It is thinking outside the box, though.
     
  11. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 4,023

    RodStRace
    Member

  12. 1twisted1
    Joined: Nov 26, 2011
    Posts: 184

    1twisted1
    Member

  13. khead47
    Joined: Mar 29, 2010
    Posts: 1,789

    khead47
    Member

    There is a NOS 302 Jimmy with a wayne head for sale on the auction site for only $20,000!
     
  14. badshifter
    Joined: Apr 28, 2006
    Posts: 3,537

    badshifter
    Member

    This:
    [​IMG]

    Bristol 2.5 liter
     
  15. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,348

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    Some questions?
    No hop up stuff available for your OEM motor then?
    Was Packard affiliated / owned by any of the other big mfgs? If so, you might consider updating your I-6 with a "family" motor.
    There is a nice thread on OHC Ponchos here, how about that?
    Lastlly, how about some of the HO Hudson motors?
    Have fun, Gary
     
  16. damagedduck
    Joined: Jun 16, 2011
    Posts: 2,341

    damagedduck
    Member
    from Greeley Co


    4.0Ltr we've got one with over 169.ooo miles W/no major repairs,never even opened it up.{knock on wood} gets 16-19mpg on hyway at 65-70mph,ya can do a stroker for next to no $,
    a 4.6Ltr
    check this out.......

    http://www.ajeepthing.com/stroker-motor.html
     
  17. Stevie Nash
    Joined: Oct 24, 2007
    Posts: 2,999

    Stevie Nash
    Member

    Love your Packard!
     
  18. Cruiser
    Joined: May 29, 2006
    Posts: 2,241

    Cruiser
    Member

    A nice 302 with a 200R4 tranny makes for cool cruising. The car look very nice and will look good.

    CRUISER :cool:
     
  19. oldcarfart
    Joined: Apr 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,436

    oldcarfart
    Member

    Since you are open minded I would look at which engine has the most aftermarket support (chev 235?).
     
  20. Algon
    Joined: Mar 12, 2007
    Posts: 1,129

    Algon
    Member

    I like the idea of a Jimmy 6 but being a Packard I'm thinking a Straight 8 or a v-12 should be under that hood. Say a dressed GMC 12 with 50's Packard scripts welded into the covers.
     
  21. 1twisted1
    Joined: Nov 26, 2011
    Posts: 184

    1twisted1
    Member

    No hop up stuff available for your OEM motor then? There are but do not what to used it. rather abuse a differant motor keep the packard one stock.

    Was Packard affiliated / owned by any of the other big mfgs? If so, you might consider updating your I-6 with a "family" motor.This i do not know?
     
  22. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

     
  23. krooser
    Joined: Jul 25, 2004
    Posts: 4,584

    krooser
    Member

    Packard was an true independent until the last years when Studebaker bought them. The last true Packard was a '56... the '57's an '58's were gussied up Studebaker Hawks...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Packard
     
  24. Are you trying to stick to traditional styling? If you are not so concerned, there are lots of options for a i-6. Especially with a little thinking you can make them look pretty neat... quad4rods does a nice example with a 2.4 ltr 4 banger (little small for your application though) but it does use sidedrafts - a very nice touch. there is a model a in denmark (i think?) that they put a high output cosworth engine in and it flys! looks darn original too. (web search under cosworth model a i think)
    i am a big fan of lexus/toyota i-6's - tons of parts (yes, yes, the 2JZ/1JZ is a supra motor too), though there are plenty of other ones. Chevy has the i-5 if you want something different - so does Volvo. In my 37 pack i'll probably end up with a Volvo T6, twin turbo'd. All depends on what your looking for. Great car btw!!
     
  25. T-Faust
    Joined: May 18, 2007
    Posts: 313

    T-Faust
    Member

    I fooled around with a Packard idea once. Seems to me that Fat Man Fabrications can supply an R&P front end, complete with mounts. Don't recall the price,butseems to me it beat fabrication.
     
  26. 'Mo
    Joined: Sep 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,432

    'Mo
    Member

    How about a Packard V8?

    In the 60's, a '37 Chevy sedan with a Packard V8 (with four pots on a U-Fab manifold) actually won the Pikes Peak Hill Climb! :eek: (No kiddin' !)
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.