Register now to get rid of these ads!

SBC Rebuild (Crankshaft Issue)

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by EWalters, Dec 26, 2011.

  1. EWalters
    Joined: Mar 21, 2011
    Posts: 15

    EWalters
    Member

    I am rebuilding a SBC for my '40 Chevy P/U. After taking the crankshaft to a reputable local machine shop to get checked out and cleaned up, I was told I need new .030 bearings. I am reading books teaching myself how to do this but after getting the bearings and crankshaft installed and the bolts torqued to specs (70 ft/lbs for a 350 V8), I cannot get all the pistons installed because the crankshaft will not turn. At all! It seems like the crankshaft should turn by hand just a little.



    :confused:
     
  2. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 23,921

    Deuces

    Did you mix the main caps around??? :eek:
     
  3. burnout2614
    Joined: Sep 21, 2009
    Posts: 612

    burnout2614
    Member

    Before installing pistons, see how easy the crank turns. If hard to turn loosen one main cap at a time til it loosens up. The crank should be stamped rod undersize and main undersize. It is possible for the mains to be .030 and the rods another size. peace
     
  4. David Totten
    Joined: Nov 21, 2005
    Posts: 248

    David Totten
    Member

    should turn or as Dueces says or a bearing cocked on you. Try plastiguage}
     

  5. burnout2614
    Joined: Sep 21, 2009
    Posts: 612

    burnout2614
    Member

    If the crank won't turn easily, without rods installed, you have to find the cause. peace
     
  6. Main caps for a small block are numbered & they have an arrow on each, make sure arrow points towards the front, I personally would never use a crank that was cut .030. Throw it away & buy a crank from Summit or other retailer
     
  7. EWalters
    Joined: Mar 21, 2011
    Posts: 15

    EWalters
    Member

    Uhhhhhhh...... caps were likely mixed up. How would I rearrange?
     
  8. EWalters
    Joined: Mar 21, 2011
    Posts: 15

    EWalters
    Member

    I do know that the arrows all point in the correct direction. I wish that a new one was in the cards but not right now.
     
  9. lexington
    Joined: Jul 28, 2011
    Posts: 83

    lexington
    Member

    main caps are numbered 12345 #1is front. arrows should all point to the front. Do you have the rods installed in the right position? If the machine shop installed the pistons on the rods are sure you are putting them in in the correct cylinder? Most machine shops install pistons in firing order but put in box in sequence. If this is the case you probably have some rods in backwards
     
  10. EWalters
    Joined: Mar 21, 2011
    Posts: 15

    EWalters
    Member

    I did use the plasticguage. I got readings of .001" across the board.
     
  11. Vandy
    Joined: Nov 15, 2009
    Posts: 368

    Vandy
    Member
    from L.A. Ca

    Hi Maybe I can help you, if you can bring the block, caps, main bearings, and crank to my shop I will sort out the caps for you and set the crank and torque it - no charge
    I'm on San Fernando Rd. at Sheldon
    All Engine Machine
    9358 San Fernando Rd.
    Sun Valley Ca. 91352
    231-750-3429
    Van
     
    Last edited: Dec 26, 2011
  12. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,333

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Well, there you have it. Ask for a little, get a lot! Remember to pass-it-on.
     
  13. Take Vandy up on the offer!!!! It's one of the few sensible quotes here. SBC do not have the main caps marked with cast-in numbers. The crank should spin very freely with out any rods installed. If the caps are mixed up, any machinist worth their salt can figure it out. A little trick here and there.
    Rods don't give a shit which cylinders that they go in. Although yes there is a correct way to install the rod in relationship with the crankshaft. I hope you did not have rods in and torqued to 70. If you did, throw away the rod bolts and start over by having a shop resize the rods with new bolts. .030 under crank, with the correct radius in the fillet, no problem. Remember the old way to stroke the crankshaft, under cut with small journal rods???
     
  14. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,341

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    I have NO problem whatsoever with a -.030 crank, I dont know where some guys get some of these screwy ideas.
     
  15. 71buickfreak
    Joined: Sep 26, 2006
    Posts: 609

    71buickfreak
    Member
    from Oklahoma

    Take the guy up on his offer for sure. Did you have assembly lube on the crank? The caps are almost assuredly mixed up.

    As a side note, don't torque the main caps on the crank until you have the rods installed. Yes, it should spin free with the rods out, but it is a lot easier to rotate the assembly without all the torque.

    As for the .030" crank, no worries, it is still useable. If the machine shop says it's cool, it's cool. Racers in the 60s and 70s used to turn their brand new Chevy cranks to .060 to reduce friction. I would have no issue with .030"
     
  16. EWalters
    Joined: Mar 21, 2011
    Posts: 15

    EWalters
    Member

    Van, You're the man!
     
  17. Dyce
    Joined: Sep 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,973

    Dyce
    Member

    I agree. He's half way to a small journal crank. Not a big deal.
     
  18. Don's Hot Rods
    Joined: Oct 7, 2005
    Posts: 8,319

    Don's Hot Rods
    Member
    from florida

    I've got a factory reman Ford 351 roller motor and it came with a 30 under crank. I asked my engine machinist if that was ok and he said they have even gone that far on really high hp motors with no problems.

    Don
     
  19. ottoman
    Joined: May 4, 2008
    Posts: 341

    ottoman
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    I also agree that a crank properly ground .030 under is not an issue.
    I cant count the number cranks we ground from large journal to small journal... or 400 mains to 350 mains or all the cranks we stroked by grinding for a smaller dia bearing. Its not an issue as long as its ground correctly and has the proper radius
     
  20. outlaw256
    Joined: Jun 26, 2008
    Posts: 2,022

    outlaw256
    Member

    ive got a .030 crank in one of my sbc.and it sees some really high rpm.and i mean really high.and its still there.and its been there for awhile.
     
  21. If there was an award for being what the HAMB is all about, Van should be nominated for it.
     
  22. greg32
    Joined: Jun 21, 2007
    Posts: 2,235

    greg32
    Member
    from Indiana

    You need more than .001 on the mains. Second, plastigauge is not all that accurate, especially when youre down to a thou. Third, if you mixed the main caps up, and youre showing .001, the alignment may be a problem causing a bind. So, as someone said, take it to a good machine shop, line hone it and mic the clearances and get the correct bearings. While youre there, mic the rod journals and big end of the rods and buy the correct bearings. Good luck. The crank, when installed, should spin easily by hand.
     
  23. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,257

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Another thought, albeit a stretch. When they told you that the engine needed .030 over bearings, did they possibly say, or imply that the crank also needed to be turned .030 under? I'm assuming that the crank is already a .030 under crank, and if it is, there should be markings on the crank as pointed out earlier in this thread.
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2011
  24. greg32
    Joined: Jun 21, 2007
    Posts: 2,235

    greg32
    Member
    from Indiana

    If he had .030 over bearing with a stock uncut crank, it wouldnt drop in the main bearing journals.
     
  25. ironhead68
    Joined: Feb 11, 2007
    Posts: 104

    ironhead68
    Member

    Now that Mr. Van is some wonderful PR!
     
  26. Get some Plasitgauge from the auto parts and check your clearances. Your machinist may run his stuff tight if so you will probably not turn the crank by hand when the mains are torqued. Anyway I never trust the machinist even if I am him. Check your clearances even if all you do is use plastigauge.

    Contrary to popular belief engines are not bolt together there are some things that need to be checked prior to assembly.

    BTW I run my engines pretty loose and I still use a *crank turner to assemble.

    * A little socket the slips over the crank snout.
     
  27. Larry T
    Joined: Nov 24, 2004
    Posts: 7,876

    Larry T
    Member

    Hats off to Vandy for offering to help!
    If the caps aren't numbered, you can match them up to the block by looking at the crosshatch on the inside of the caps and block. A little time consuming, but worth the effort. I think line honing the mains would be a last resort and expensive.
    A crank should turn very easily (1 finger easy) with the crank installed and torqued down. Don't go any further until you get it fixed.
    Larry T
     
  28. AG F/C
    Joined: Oct 20, 2009
    Posts: 364

    AG F/C
    Member

    If the bearings were torqued with the wrong cap, move the caps to their correct location but keep the bearings with the mated half they were forst torqued with. The shells crush some at the ends and can be loose with another half. Not enouth crush can allow them to spin or move around.
     
  29. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,980

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Years ago I got into the habit of turning the crank a full rotation or more after I torqued each main cap down and then again after I torqued each rod cap down. It's saved me a lot of headaches over the years. It might add five minutes or so to an engine assembly job but you know right when and where you run into a problem.

    I'd be loading it up and heading to Vandy's shop in a heartbeat. He can make sure that everything is right on it along with matching the caps.
     
  30. Unless it is a forged crank, why bother using it if you can get a 10/10 crank polished & chamford for 129.00 from Summit
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.