Register now to get rid of these ads!

Newer Pontiac Motors in your older Cars

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Irish1955, Sep 29, 2011.

  1. Irish1955
    Joined: Sep 14, 2011
    Posts: 56

    Irish1955
    Member

    Can anyone shed light on whch of the pontiac motors are good strong runners for 55 Pontiac 4 dr. And pics would be fricken awesome. I am looking at a 72 350 for my 55 but I would love to see some squeezed in there first.
     
  2. Rich Rogers
    Joined: Apr 8, 2006
    Posts: 2,018

    Rich Rogers
    Member

    I can't help with pics but I really wouldn't waste my time with the 350. They didn't have that much power and weren't really any better on gas than a 389 or 400. Just my .02
     
  3. Irish1955
    Joined: Sep 14, 2011
    Posts: 56

    Irish1955
    Member

    In your opinion, which way would you go? I'm not building something for street rodding, just a cruiser.
     
  4. bryan6902
    Joined: May 5, 2008
    Posts: 1,137

    bryan6902
    Member

    Physically ANY Pontiac v8 will fit in your 55 its just a matter of mounting that gets a bit tricky. 55-60 used a front/chin mount with 2 side mounts on the transmission, so a 389 from 59 or 60 will bolt in with the correct transmission. Or any other engine from that era would work as well. Putting in any later model 326-350-389-400-421-455 is no big deal you just need to fabricate 2 side engine mounts and a single trans mount.
     

  5. Like bryan said...a 55-60 engine will be a bolt-in...almost.
    When using a late 56-60 engine with the old stock 55 slant pan hydro you'll need to grind a little off the edge of the crankshaft flange to get the engine-half of the fluid coupling to fit flat against the crank flange...if you don't, the front pump of the tranny will be destroyed shortly after start-up...don't axe me how I know.
    55s had 287 cu in
    56s had 317 cu in
    57s had 347 cu in
    58s had 370 cu in
    59 and 60 had 389 cu in and will make a light 55 fly! No use in photos because the 55-60 engines all looked the same and bolt up the same...
    I'm using a 1957, 347 bored out to 370 cu in in my 34 ford coupe just because I LOVE them old pontiac engines.
    If using a manual transmission, trash the old 55-57 stick bellhousing and go with a 58-60 bellhousing....the later ones mount a chevy-type transmission and will accept everything from a muncie 4 speed, saginaw 3 and 4 speed to a T-5 overdrive trans....the early [55-57] bellhousing only accept the antique and weak select-a-shift 3 speeds with terrible gear ratios. Pure junk.
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Sep 29, 2011
  6. Nothing wrong with the 350 in a cruiser, it certainly will be easier to get parts for than the stocker. All Pontiac engines share the same block design, with upgrades and some internal configuration changes. The 350 would let you run a 200R4 without as high a degree of killing it, too.

    The rough spot in 55-57s is steering clearance. The starter is on the left, and originals the exhaust actually dumped at the front and went around. Some guys mount the motor offset an inch or two to the right to make the room needed for a rear dump to clear everything.
     
  7. PORKCHOP76
    Joined: Feb 12, 2008
    Posts: 548

    PORKCHOP76
    Member
    from iowa

    i run the stock 287 in mine and i got no complaints . and i drive it everywhere year round.
     
  8. Scarebird
    Joined: Sep 26, 2006
    Posts: 960

    Scarebird
    Alliance Vendor
    from ABQ, USA

    400. Plentiful and powerful with decent mileage. A friend has a later Poncho in his 55; e used two RH manifolds to clear starter.
     
  9. Sir Woosh
    Joined: Dec 1, 2008
    Posts: 2,273

    Sir Woosh
    Member

    Similar situation with my 55 Oldsmobile.

    74 Pontiac Trans-Am subframe worked in beautiful. Very little modification to put the body and bumper on it. Used an early 70's smallblock and short tailshaft turbo to stay forward of the stock X frame. Used a 70's column to angle out to the forward steering box. Fabbed a header panel to channel all air through the radiator and can change all the spark plugs easy just leaning over the front.

    Works for me............
     
  10. 40fordtudor
    Joined: Jan 3, 2010
    Posts: 2,503

    40fordtudor
    Member

    Times two on pure junk---left one on the street back in 1963---heart shaped hole in the case. It was factory behind my 347 tripower bored .125. Sure sounded good til the junk tranny let go. Ah. memories.
     
  11. 55chieftain
    Joined: May 29, 2007
    Posts: 2,188

    55chieftain
    Member

    Originally I built side mounts for mine with 2x2 1/4 tubing and flat plate . Also factory frame mounts bolted to it and made an adapter for the driver side to move the mount forward because of the steering gearbox. The earlier engines the frame mount is solid and the rubber mount is on the engine.

    But in your case it will be the opposite and do something like this

    http://starchief57.tripod.com/techtips.htm#late

    The 2 bolt pipe attatching manifold are smaller on the end and have a little more clearance around the gearbox also if you want a rear exit on the driver side. I mounted mine up higher than stock and off to the passenger side.

    Here's another example in this 57, same deal as the 55

    http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=112566&highlight=dirty+pontiac
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Sep 30, 2011
  12. 421 is also a good engine if you can find one.

    About any of them will take a severe beating. I would tell a story here but it would make me look real bad.
     
  13. When I had my 56, I was going to update the powertrain with a 400. The newer engines retained the front motor mount provisions, so I was going to bolt it in using the original mounts and fabricate the side mounts accordingly. Don't think about using the newer engine's timing cover as a motor mount like the 55 has as the later engine's timing cover is aluminum instead of cast iron.
     
  14. troylee
    Joined: Jul 10, 2007
    Posts: 689

    troylee
    Member

    I just finished a 1968 350 poncho and a 200r for my 58 carryall. U can damm neer get them for free. With a few tweeks u will have a good strong cruzin engine.
     
  15. 55chieftain
    Joined: May 29, 2007
    Posts: 2,188

    55chieftain
    Member

    I should have mentioned I now use a Hurst front engine mount which is only intended for the 55-60 steel covers. I put on a 60 steel cover on my 66 389 , which could also still use the stock front bracket and mount. The 60 cover is the first year of standard cooling and the last year of the steel cover. I also built side trans mounts of the back of the engine and a rear trans mount.
     
  16. Bored Over
    Joined: Aug 9, 2008
    Posts: 76

    Bored Over
    Member

    So, let me get this straight. Use a 60 steel cover on any 60's-70's pontiac engine and it will bolt right up with the 55-56 stock bracket and mount? I've also read about transmission clearance issues with the "x" portion of the frame? Has anyone ever cut out the"x" and just added a couple of crossmembers?
     
  17. 55chieftain
    Joined: May 29, 2007
    Posts: 2,188

    55chieftain
    Member

    That only takes take of the front mounting, it needs more than just a single rear mount. It needs side rear mounts on the engine. Also on the cover originally it had a piece of cork spring loaded against the back, bore it a use a newer stye seal like this

    http://www.pontiacsafari.com/L1Garage/FrontSealUpgrade.pdf

    The side mount could be made to tie into the factory trans crossmember. I couldn't do it that way because of my headers. A short th350/400 will go right in. A long tail trans could cause some issues, but not worth taking the x member out for. My build thread has alot of this stuff covered in pics on how I did it.

    One thing I can't verify is if newer manifolds will clear the upper control arms in the stock mounting location of the engine, the 287 manifolds are pretty small and flat.
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2011
  18. bryan6902
    Joined: May 5, 2008
    Posts: 1,137

    bryan6902
    Member

    No matter what, putting a later model Pontiac engine is no more work than putting an off-brand engine in!

    Bored Over- Not sure you can just swap the early cover on the later engine, plus you would have to fab up side transmission mounts. At that point you might as well fab 2 side engine mounts since doing a singular rear mount is a snap. I don't know what transmission you would need to use to have to cut out the X member out. I had a Small Chevy with a TH 350 mocked up in my 57 frame at one point and there was still GOBS of room.
     
  19. 55chieftain
    Joined: May 29, 2007
    Posts: 2,188

    55chieftain
    Member

    If anything use the bracket and front mount on the newer engine to set the engine in place to build the side mounts. Just have the manifolds on to make sure they clear the steering gearbox.

    The crank snout is 1/4" longer on the newer engines as well, so the crank will stick a little furthur out. If you read thru the seal article, the alignment tool is a must. I borrowed it from the author to do mine.
     
  20. ThePontiacKid
    Joined: Feb 10, 2011
    Posts: 63

    ThePontiacKid
    Member
    from VA

    I'd go with a 389 if possible. Strong reliable engine. Good luck, can't wait to see pics.
     
  21. caseyrod
    Joined: Feb 9, 2008
    Posts: 138

    caseyrod
    Member

    if your not racing there is nothing wrong by using a 350.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.