Register now to get rid of these ads!

most reliable carb setup for mild 283??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by revkev6, Apr 28, 2011.

  1. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    hey guys, I've got a mildly built 283 in my 32. I was planning on running 3 97's on it but i've already got 2 of em on the flatty in my 28 and decided with the ethanol gas I'd be spending ALL my time rebuilding 97's if I did!

    Anyway, I decided to go with the standard single 4 on an edelbrock C4b intake. the motor is a 65 283 bored 30 over with camel hump heads and supposedly 2" valves. it had a huge solid lifter cam in it when it ran for a time as a drag motor which was replaced with an 80's "RV cam" which I'm guessing is just a mild performance cam?? it's hydraulic with roller rockers. Supposedly has 8k miles on it since it was rebuilt (hasn't run since the cam swap as far as I know) i'm putting a mallory double life dizzy on it and most likely an msd box. it will be running gm ram's horn manifolds.

    my question is what size would be my best bet for a carb?? I'm not looking for the most power but a good reliable setup that won't cause issues with this crap ethanol gas. I was thinking of going with a 500cfm edelbrock afb clone but have still heard of people having issues with ethanol on these. Is there a good solution that won't require me putting a rebuild kit in the carb every spring?? Does 500cfm sound about right??
     
  2. AAFD
    Joined: Apr 13, 2010
    Posts: 585

    AAFD
    Member
    from US of A

    Holley 80457
     
  3. 70dodgeman
    Joined: Jan 30, 2009
    Posts: 205

    70dodgeman
    Member
    from Alpha NJ

    That's a good carb. I've had problems with the transfer tube o'rings leaking from the E85 gas. I would go on mcmaster carr and get viton o'rings.
     
  4. Hdonlybob
    Joined: Feb 1, 2005
    Posts: 4,115

    Hdonlybob
    Member

    I have a very similar 283 set up running an Edelbrock 550 carb on an Edelbrock Performer intake w/Ram Horns.....can't vouch for the ethanol problem, but it runs and "scats" very well.... a real pleasure to drive...
    Good luck,
     

  5. Bill Rinaldi
    Joined: Mar 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,877

    Bill Rinaldi
    Member

    My 2 cents is on a new 500 cfm edelbrock. It is NOT to small (cfm) for a 283 and a lot easier to deal with. 15% Ethenal doesn't seem to bother it but I'd stay away from E85 BILL RINALDI
     
  6. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    is it pretty much plug and play for a 283?? I'm wondering if an RV cam most likely designed for a 350 translates to a hotter cam when installed in a 283. I HATE that I'm running a sbc and know that I won't want to bother F-ing with the carb tuning it. I'll pull the bitch and bolt in another flatty if it comes to tinkering. (please give me an excuse :D)

    BTW, we only have 10% ethanol up here but it's still a pain! Nothing like when I ran alchy injected midgets but.....
     
  7. Ole don
    Joined: Dec 16, 2005
    Posts: 2,915

    Ole don
    Member

    I ran a 500 Edelbrock for several years on 10% ethanol fuel with no problems. The smaller carb on a smaller engine gives great throttle response at the RPM where you drive the car. I highly recomend it. Thats a lot of money to spend on ignition. Send a stock dizzy to GMC Bubba for a custom curve and a Pertronix conversion.
     
  8. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma


    my ole man put a 600cfm edelbrock with matching performer manifold on a 302/c4 sbf back 10-15 years ago and it ran GREAT but that was before the ethanol gas. I generally use stabil and fog with marvel mystery oil every fall in my flatty with 97's and it helps a lot with ethanol issues.

    I don't want to overcarb this motor. I figure the smaller the carb I can get away with the better it will run. I don't care if it runs out of snot on top, It's in front of all early ford drivetrain so choking it down a bit on power doesn't bother me, it saves me money!
     
  9. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma


    I think I've got $25 in the ignition. I found an NOS double life dizzy for $25 at a swap a few years ago and I have a couple good msd 6al boxes lying around from when I raced midgets. those things made a HUGE difference in the way the midget motors ran on restarts!

    I still might send the dizzy out to bubba though. check the curve and the condensor (don't even know if I need that with the msd??), set the points etc.
     
  10. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    another consideration I have is era. the afb came out in the mid-late 50's and the holley came out in the mid-late 60's correct?? my car is circa 1960.
     
  11. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,729

    carbking
    Member

    Both the Carter AFB and the Holley 4150 hit the streets in 1957.

    For most reliable I would suggest either the Carter WCFB or the Rochester 4GC that were original equipment for the 283.

    Both have zinc alloy bowls (like the Holley). While susceptible over time if the original chromate finish has been removed, zinc alloy is less susceptible to ethanol than the aluminum of the AFB.

    Both the WCFB and the 4GC came with leather accelerator pumps. The leather is totally impervious to ethanol in any mixture.

    And both ran pretty good!

    Jon.
     
  12. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    thanks for the info jon! I would love to get a wcfb on this bad boy! (not a fan of the 4gc for no particular reason besides aesthetics :rolleyes:)

    I always thought the ethanol dried out the leather?? plus they are expensive, hard to find and need a rebuild etc.
     
  13. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,729

    carbking
    Member

    I think Holley started the neopreme pump craze about 1954 when they started making pumps for the 2140 and 4000 with replacable neopreme cups, so they could make much less expensive repair kits.

    Rochester went to neopreme pumps about 1962, as the neopreme pumps were about 20 times cheaper to make than leather.

    Carter didn't go to neopreme until the late 1970's when they were struggling to survive emissions and the neopreme was about 20 times cheaper.

    Stromberg NEVER went to neopreme.

    The compelling reason to use neopreme pumps was always cost, never performance.

    Jon.
     
  14. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    Jon, do you sell any rebuilt wcfb or AFB carbs?? I've actually got a 4gc off of a 54 olds 98 sitting in my cellar, any thoughts on rebuilding it??
     
  15. rusty bill
    Joined: Oct 7, 2010
    Posts: 242

    rusty bill
    Member

    What about the stock dual fours?
     
  16. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,729

    carbking
    Member

    First, my posts on this forum are NOT intended to advertise my product. They are intended as professional advice (of course others will differ in opinion). Some will even tell you the free advice is worth less than you paid for it!!!;)

    We are sold out of Chevrolet WCFB carbs and rebuilt 4-GC Chevrolet carbs.

    DO NOT take a 4-GC from an Olds and put on your 283. Be patient, check our website for the PROPER carb numbers, and then look around for the proper carb.

    The 1959 and newer WCFB or 4-GC are less expensive than the 1955-1958, easier to locate, and an updated design.

    The most expensive carburetor you will ever buy, is the WRONG one given free that you attempt to modify!

    Jon.
     
  17. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma


    I might as well start building a flathead! those factory dual four setups are big money! plus i think they are way overkill for this engine. I'd need to run a hotter cam, better exhaust etc.

    want to keep it simple, it's just a sbc after all ;)
     
  18. dragwillys
    Joined: Nov 20, 2004
    Posts: 71

    dragwillys
    Member

    ho bout 2 2gc 2 barrels im running them on my 32 vintage speed has them
     
  19. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    not taken as such, but I do NOT feel like messing with carbs, and want to get something that will bolt on and WORK. seems to me my best bet would be the new holley or edelbrock for that??
     
  20. bgaro
    Joined: Sep 3, 2010
    Posts: 1,189

    bgaro
    Member

    not sure if even a brand new carb will be safe for crappy fuel. i think an edelbrock 500cfm will be good for your application tho. sta-bil now makes a additive to keep ethanol from seperating when it sits to long, i dont know if its anygood or not, i just saw it advertised.
     
  21. ClayPigeonKiller
    Joined: Mar 3, 2010
    Posts: 203

    ClayPigeonKiller
    Member

    390 cfm 4v or a 350 cfm stock 2 barrel. Both would be plenty adequate with a daily driver. The old rule I knew was 1.5 X expected hp.

    200hp X 1.5 = 300 cfm

    I saw a 390 holley in the paper for $75, and stock carbs could be had for whatever you want to spend. If you intend to run alcohol you have to replace the original rubber in the carb (needles, seals, gaskets) with harder rubber. I think you can buy kits for more popular carbs.

    An RV cam is a torque, super smooth idle, daily driver kinda cam.

    No reason to buy a new carb, EVER. Rebuild kits are usually very inexpensive. When you get into it, carbs are pretty simple to rebuild. Be patient, maybe take pictures, and an exploded view of the carb can be a blessing.

    Adam
     
  22. 52Poncho
    Joined: Apr 23, 2011
    Posts: 256

    52Poncho
    Member

    500 cfm Edelbrock
     
  23. fleetside66
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,009

    fleetside66
    Member

    I've been running a 500 cfm Edelbrock on my stock '65 283 & it's been great...great throttle response. I did have to use a fuel pressure regulator, however. These carbs only run on low pressure, so count on getting one (and not a cheapie...I have an Edelbrock on my setup). I've had no apparent ethynol issues.
     
  24. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma


    that's a good point on the fuel pressure, I will be running an electric pump as I am using a hurst mount the blocks the mechanical fuel pump from use.
     
  25. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,980

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  26. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,980

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'll have to admit that I have been a hard core Holley guy for the past 40 years but six months ago I put an Edelbrock carb on my daily drive 350 and outside of still needing a bit of a metering rod change it has worked flawlessly. No cranking until the battey almost gives out on cold mornings and instant starts when it's hot.

    I'd vote for the Edelbrock of the right size and an Hei based ignition and drive and grin from then on out.
     
  27. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    alright, so we have plenty of votes for the 500cfm edelbrock.

    lets narrow this down. I've never run a carb with electric choke, should I start now?? what is required for electric choke?? do they just need power or is there a temp sensor??
     
  28. Hdonlybob
    Joined: Feb 1, 2005
    Posts: 4,115

    Hdonlybob
    Member

    Just power on the electric choke....do it...you will love it !! JMHO
     
  29. 52Poncho
    Joined: Apr 23, 2011
    Posts: 256

    52Poncho
    Member

    Nothing wrong with a Holley, just think an Edelbrock (Carter) is a simpler carb. I run a 4160 600cfm 1850 on my small block. Have had no problems with the new fuels. The new Holley carb kits work with alcohol in the new fuels.

    Electric choke yes.
     
  30. Abomination
    Joined: Oct 5, 2006
    Posts: 6,719

    Abomination
    Member

    I'm partial to the 4G, myself. That might do ya pretty well, actually!

    ~Jason
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.