Register now to get rid of these ads!

702 GMC V12 twin 6

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by adamabomb76, Aug 13, 2008.

  1. 454_4_ON_THE_FLOOR
    Joined: Feb 15, 2009
    Posts: 179

    454_4_ON_THE_FLOOR
    Member
    from Selden, TX

    I found out about these researching my gmc's 305, which was missing when I got it. Never actually seen one, only read about them. Very cool!
     
  2. mattfink
    Joined: Jun 1, 2009
    Posts: 107

    mattfink
    Member

    Seen elvis's one in person, when you first see it it looks like two V8s.
     
  3. jonzcustomshop
    Joined: Jun 25, 2007
    Posts: 1,927

    jonzcustomshop
    Member

    Attached Files:

  4. Gareth
    Joined: Jun 18, 2008
    Posts: 87

    Gareth
    Member
    from San Diego

    That's an Australian car, owned and built by Elvis who you can see in the pic. Only recently finished but I believe he had it for sale.
     
  5. Fiorano
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Posts: 212

    Fiorano
    Member

    big cubes- i swoon!
    i would love a prewar style huge cube engine
     
  6. stainlesssteelrat
    Joined: Nov 23, 2010
    Posts: 583

    stainlesssteelrat
    Member
    from ms

    don't need high revs when you got lots of torque and high gears, it's got all the torque in the world to turn the tall ones, put one of those 702's together with a 5spd with some tall hwy gears and a rear-end that's just as up there and you got a ride that'll make the speedometer spin like a helicopter.

    more than one way to skin a cat.
     
  7. Fiorano
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Posts: 212

    Fiorano
    Member

    I like that idea . So where have all the giant cube engines gone hiding? It doesn't need to be Brutus aero engine big (24!liters) but that is my weakness in dream builds
     
  8. darkk
    Joined: Sep 2, 2010
    Posts: 456

    darkk
    Member

    I believe I have the opportunity to buy two of these 702 V12's. The offer was presented to me. They are both complete and still in the trucks untouched. Not sure if I want the headache involved...:confused:
     
  9. oj
    Joined: Jul 27, 2008
    Posts: 6,459

    oj
    Member

    Check the photos from the Jalopy Showdown and the JalopyRama (i think), there is a guy in Maryland with an old COE, chopped and channelled all to hell and gone with one of those engines behind the cab. If i recall right the valve cover look like a 'w' motor so it look like a pair of 348"s or 409's bolted together. Sparkplugs come from the top down, get to them from between the intake runners.
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  10. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,103

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    This Jimmy was at Back to the Fifties last year. Running a 702 V12.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    kiwijeff and lothiandon1940 like this.
  11. Griznant
    Joined: Jan 4, 2010
    Posts: 93

    Griznant
    Member

    I remember a 351 V6 my grandpa had in this contraption we called the "dune buggy" up at the deer shanty. It was an old panel truck that had been hacked down to a frame/cowl/dash with the frame shortened to a ridiculously short length. Front tires were old bald truck tires, rears were steel truck rims welded into larger tractor rims with tractor tires. Rear fenders were construction signs and there were bus seats sitting sideways over each rear wheel. Front seat was a 60's GM bench and it had a Camaro hood covering the engine hinged with some old barn-door hinges welded to it.

    The engine was a friggin' monster. First "car" I ever drove, and you didn't shift, and you didn't touch the gas. Just let out the clutch and it would chug through the woods going through damned near anything that got in the way. Ungodly low-end torque. Carried seven guys to their deer blinds for decades. Still ran when they scrapped it out in favor of 4-wheelers. :(
     
  12. RDR
    Joined: May 30, 2009
    Posts: 1,489

    RDR
    Member

    worked for GMC Truck and Coach from 1965-1971 and these engines were worked on daily in our shop...most had been converted to propane as it was a cheaper fuel at the time..3 MPG was correct, but all the gas pot trucks pulling max weight were getting about 3-5 mpg..that's what pushed the move to diesel...I remember a board in the sales room that had pistons,rods,valves from the GMC V6, IHC, Ford,and Chevy...the GMC parts were massive and HEAVY in comparison and I will say one thing....IT WON'T LIKE HIGH RPMS and it don't need rpm,just gear high and go......albeit, it is still hard to make a silk purse out of a sows ear
     
  13. c-10 simplex
    Joined: Aug 24, 2009
    Posts: 1,371

    c-10 simplex
    Member

    So, what could you do to increase rpm range?

    What about increasing mpg?
     
  14. I think this is the one your talking about, a beast of an engine...
    [​IMG]
     
    kiwijeff and lothiandon1940 like this.
  15. treb11
    Joined: Jan 21, 2006
    Posts: 3,958

    treb11
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    sounds like a good applicaiton for those Stromberg aircraft carbs....
     
  16. mtrhd
    Joined: Sep 12, 2008
    Posts: 90

    mtrhd
    Member

    as seen at GoodGuys Chicago '09 & '10 (w/updates), an awe inspiring pickup truck!
     

    Attached Files:

  17. nocoastsaint
    Joined: Jan 5, 2006
    Posts: 413

    nocoastsaint
    Member



    thunderv12.com
     
  18. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    You could lighten the rotating assembly, and change cams-that would go a long ways toward it.

    I would be very interested in one of these engines, if anyone knows of one at a reasonable price.
     
  19. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    -------------------
    If you don't want to build them and the price is
    good, grab them anyway and re-sell them.

    Mart3406
    ==============================
     
  20. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    --------------------
    About the stock 3000 rpm rev limit. Don't
    forget that these were commercial medium
    and heavy-duty truck engines that were
    expected to run at near maximum load
    most of the time and still go 150 to 200
    thousand miles between overhauls - and to
    achieve that, they came fitted with engine
    speed governors that limited them to about
    3000 rpm. The 3000 rpm supposed limit was
    probably a function of the governor more than
    the actual mechanical limitations of the engine
    design.

    As for or raising both the rpm range and
    fuel mileage, in addition to reducing the
    reciprocating mass and grinding new cam
    profiles, as was previously mentioned, I'll
    bet that adding a modern-day long duration
    and/or multi-spark CD ignition would also
    help quite a bit too.

    Better still - If you wanted to go a bit nuts
    and make some insane power - with or
    without raising the rpm level very much
    (although more or less forgetting you ever
    heard of the phrase "fuel mileage" LOL!)
    - how about - four T3/T4 hybrid turbos,
    mounted two per side, one on each of four
    stock exhaust manifolds, feeding into an
    intercooler and then into a fabricated tunnel
    ram-style intake manifold (or manifolds)
    fitted with a throttle body (or bodies), and
    fed fuel by twelve 55 lb./hour. EFI port
    injectors, driven by a homebuilt Megasquirt
    controller??!!:eek: I helped build a similar
    set-up using a *single* T3/T4 turbo and
    homebrew intake & Megaquirt EFI setup
    for my buddy's 144 cubic inch Pinto engine.
    That ended up dynoing at a bit over 400 hp
    on 22 lbs boost at a conservative and very
    street usable 5500 rpm. Multiply that same
    set-up times four and 1600-plus hp and
    1200-plus ft/lbs of torque from a 702 cubic
    inch GMC V12 spinning at around 5000
    rpm, would probably be achievable - and
    still with near stock idle and drivability!!!
    :eek::eek::eek:

    Mart3406
    ===========================
     
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2011
  21. c-10 simplex
    Joined: Aug 24, 2009
    Posts: 1,371

    c-10 simplex
    Member

  22. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    I think everthing Mart3406 said is correct. You can safely turn 4000 rpm by turning the govener up.

    On of the weaknesses is the way those heads breath. A good, proper port job, with a good cam, would also really help.

    Joe Panek at Roto-Faze is probably your best bet for a custom billet, hi-po cam.

    He's doing two for me, for the FlatCad.
     
  23. Chev38
    Joined: Nov 3, 2007
    Posts: 39

    Chev38
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    In the mid 1970's Safeway of Canada had a COE with a 702 used for cross country hauling with tandem trailers. Every 250,000 miles it would come in to Western GMC Truck Centre in Edmonton Alberta where I was working at the time for a valve grind on all 4 heads. I was there for 2 or 3 of them. After over a million miles the bottom end still had not been apart. Not sure what happened to it, it was still on the road when I quit in 1977. Tons of torque and bullet prove from factory. Wil
     
  24. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    ------------------
    Mid-70's I doubt that it would have been a 702 GMC gasser. The 702 V12 wasn't installed in new trucks after the 1965 model year and was replaced by a 678 V8 version for 1966. Are you sure it wasn't a 12V71 diesel? The 12V71 was an entirely different engine, (think two 6-71 inline Detroits but arraigned in a 'V' configuration in a common block) and not related in any way to the 702 V12 gas enenine.

    Mart3406
    ====================
     
  25. Chev38
    Joined: Nov 3, 2007
    Posts: 39

    Chev38
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It was in the mid 1970's that I worked at the dealership, the truck had been on the road long before I worked on it and probably after I left.
     
  26. 38FLATTIE
    Joined: Oct 26, 2008
    Posts: 4,349

    38FLATTIE
    Member
    from Colorado

    I think a good port job, new custom cam, electric fuel pumps, HEI, and dual 6-71's, or 4 turbos as mart3406 suggested, would be one mean, torquey, tire burning machine!
     
  27. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    -------------------
    The relatively easy 1600-plus hp you could
    get with a homebrew "T3/T4 quad-turbo &
    Megasquirted EFI" setup would certainly
    help make up for at least *some* of the
    'elephantesque' 1400-plus lb.weight of
    one of these monsters!! It wouldn't be
    "practical", "politically correct", or
    "environmentally friendly" (heck, any
    one of these are good enough reasons, just
    by themselves to justify building one!!!:D)
    or in any way cheap to build, And you'd need
    a hell of big car - probably one specifically
    designed around the engine - to put it in.
    Oh, but it sure could be fun!!!:D :D

    Mart3406
    =========================
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2011
  28. 4284555sd
    Joined: Jun 29, 2009
    Posts: 62

    4284555sd
    Member

    Why are you going to use CAT rods, the v12 have steel rods and crank in them. They would suck the ball out of the PCV valve and put them on top of the piston. The PCV valve was under the valve cover and screwed into the intake port. There is someone ( I saw him on youtube ) that's doing what you want to do with this engine. This man is cranking them up to around 6000 RPM. Timimg these engine where two dist. that came out the back of one main dist. The points were in the big dist.( 2 sets ) and you timed the front six with one little dist. and the back six with the other. The timimg had to be right or you would burn a hole in a piston. The gov. work off of oil pressure. Remember 2 intakes 2 carb. 2 govs. and 2 carb. linkage, and it all had to be right. If you look on youtube at v12 GMC you'll find a old man on the back of a Dodge flat bed showing his V12 with it running. I sold him this engine and the truck it came out of. I don't have any more V12, I kind of miss them. I am a old mechanica and I've owned, run, worked on all the old stuff.
     
  29. 067chevy
    Joined: Sep 18, 2005
    Posts: 2,073

    067chevy
    Member

    I just found one of these engines for 300.00 but it is stuck. I'm wondering if it is worth buying. Owner says it ran 20 years ago.
     
  30. 067chevy
    Joined: Sep 18, 2005
    Posts: 2,073

    067chevy
    Member

    Lets try one more time
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.