Register now to get rid of these ads!

216 to 261 swap

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 1951chevb, Sep 10, 2010.

  1. 1951chevb
    Joined: Aug 4, 2009
    Posts: 26

    1951chevb
    Member
    from milwaukee

    Before you guys it I all ready searched but couldnt a definitive answer. Will swapping in a 261 out of a 57 truck be the same as dropping in a 235. What I mean is what do I have to do for this motor to bolt into my car, without to much hassle. Thanks guys if you can answer my question.
     
  2. jcmarz
    Joined: Jan 10, 2010
    Posts: 4,631

    jcmarz
    Member
    from Chino, Ca

    Same block, bigger bore. That's the beauty of Chevrolets, easy swapping!
     
  3. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,663

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Same as the 235. I'm doing this right now myself. Mine's going in my '53 Chevy pickup...what are you putting your 261 in?

    Your black sedan in your avatar?
     
  4. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,663

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If it's going in your '51...you've got side engine-mounts, correct? Even though I'll be using the front engine-mount for my truck, I noticed that my '54 "Jobmaster" 261 will also accept the side-mounts. Does yours?
     

  5. 1951chevb
    Joined: Aug 4, 2009
    Posts: 26

    1951chevb
    Member
    from milwaukee

    My 51 has the front style engine mount and it looks like the 261 does also.
     
  6. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,663

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Oh. I used to have a '52 Chevy sedan years ago. If I remember correctly, it had side-mounts. I thought the '51 and '52 was the same...guess not. I can't keep all this stuff straight...or I'm just getting senile, and can't remember correctly...a definite possibility.

    Anyway...sounds like you're gonna have no problem. Enjoy the new-found power of your 261.
     
  7. 1951chevb
    Joined: Aug 4, 2009
    Posts: 26

    1951chevb
    Member
    from milwaukee

    Sounds like its pretty much bolt in. Will I really notice a difference in power?
     
  8. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,663

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Hell yes, you'll notice a difference. You won't be smokin' the tires, but you'll definitely be "chirping" them. LOL. 45 more cubic inches, and the 261 has a bit of a higher-lift stock cam than the 235 too. I think the valves are a little bigger too...don't quote me on that though. You might look into Patrick's Saginaw conversion for your trans as well...much better drivability due to better gear ratios in first and second. He also has new 3:55 gears for your rear axle...unless you already have that. Is yours standard shift or automatic? standard shift=4:11 gears, auto=3:55 gears. A standard shift with 3:55 ring and pinion makes for a great driver.

    BTW...real nice looking '51.
     
  9. fordcragar
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 3,198

    fordcragar
    Member
    from Yakima WA.

    The only problem would be the 57 motor has a longer water pump. Usually what I do with these is drive the fan hub back on the shaft and then cut the excess off of the shaft, then use a shallower pulley.
     
  10. 1951chevb
    Joined: Aug 4, 2009
    Posts: 26

    1951chevb
    Member
    from milwaukee

    Its a 3 speed car so its got the 4:11s in it. The 261 should bolt to my trans right?
     
  11. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,663

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I wasn't aware of that. Thanks, fordcrager! Good to know before dropping it into the vehicle! I wonder if the water-pump from the same-year 235 is a bolt-on to the 261.
     
  12. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,663

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Absolutely. Use your original bellhousing, but use the flywheel that hopefully came with the 261.
     
  13. 1951chevb
    Joined: Aug 4, 2009
    Posts: 26

    1951chevb
    Member
    from milwaukee

    Thanks so much for answering my questions. Yes its a complete motor and trans from fan to tailshaft and air cleaner to oil pan
     
  14. 1951chevb
    Joined: Aug 4, 2009
    Posts: 26

    1951chevb
    Member
    from milwaukee

    Sorry one last question do you I use the 216 clutch disc or the 261 stuff.
     
  15. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,663

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I believe the clutch-disc and pressure-plates are the same, and interchange. But...the 261 was in large trucks, so the pressure-plate might be a little heavier duty...not sure. For the disc, just make sure it fits the splines on the input-shaft of your car's trans., and you'll be good.

    Don't be sorry for asking questions...that's what we're all hear for. And I don't believe for a second, that this was your last question!...LOL. (maybe last question for tonight)

    BTW...if you want to talk to someone who really knows this stuff inside and out...call Patrick's. He's a great guy, as is his staff...always willing to help. If a female answers, don't be put off, thinking she doesn't know stuff...she does! Good luck with everything. If you'd like, send me a PM sometime soon, and we can share info. - Rick
     
  16. adamshumard
    Joined: Jan 18, 2007
    Posts: 1,379

    adamshumard
    Member

    If the 261 is like the 57 235 then you can order a waterpump thats been shortened with a different pulley from chevs of the 40s. Thats what i did to get the 58 235 into my 54. also remember that if you use the front motor mounts you have to have the bell housing with the side mounts to stabilize the whole assembly. not just the normal rear trans mounts like my 54 has. not sure what a 51 is set up like
     
  17. Rickybop
    Joined: May 23, 2008
    Posts: 9,663

    Rickybop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Good points, Adam. Since the '51 apparently uses the single front mount, and the original bellhousing is going to be used, there'll be no problem though.
     
  18. fordcragar
    Joined: Dec 28, 2005
    Posts: 3,198

    fordcragar
    Member
    from Yakima WA.

    The water pumps are easy to shorten, finding a shallow pulley would probably be the hardest part of the job.
     
  19. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,534

    Stovebolt
    Member

    I used a Y-block water pump pulley - same bolt-pattern
     
  20. adamshumard
    Joined: Jan 18, 2007
    Posts: 1,379

    adamshumard
    Member

    is a 216 the same as a 235 and 261 though?
     
  21. motion guru
    Joined: Oct 18, 2009
    Posts: 169

    motion guru
    Member
    from yacolt, wa

    From the standpoint of doing a swap - yes.
     
  22. adamshumard
    Joined: Jan 18, 2007
    Posts: 1,379

    adamshumard
    Member

    sorry i meant the bell housing pattern. should have been more specific.
     
  23. 1951chevb
    Joined: Aug 4, 2009
    Posts: 26

    1951chevb
    Member
    from milwaukee

    Im hoping the bellhousing pattern is the same havent checked it yet. So if anyone knows for ure I would appreciate it.
     
  24. Kopperhead
    Joined: Feb 23, 2005
    Posts: 120

    Kopperhead
    Member

  25. 56sedandelivery
    Joined: Nov 21, 2006
    Posts: 6,695

    56sedandelivery
    Member Emeritus

  26. StefanS
    Joined: Oct 7, 2013
    Posts: 1,287

    StefanS
    Member
    from Maryland

    What was the outcome of this one? I know it's been a few (5) years but this is the first thread that popped up. Since this is my favorite site, I figured I'd kick it back off for those thinking of doing the same. Im trying to get things figured out for when my '51s 235 kicks the bucket. I was thinking full pressure 235 but if the 261 will accept all of my bolt ons from my current motor than I'm going that route instead.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.