Register now to get rid of these ads!

Looking to be schooled on how traditional air bags are?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by sckracing, Dec 15, 2009.

  1. Now I'll start this out by saying I'm not trying to start a chassis war or divide the HAMB'er nation...
    so put your air guns back on the tool boxes, disconnect the air line, and step away slowly..., and give me, and probably some other guys out there wondering the where "traditional" line in the sand is, if there is even such a thing (and whether your use of bags is tied to tradition or just your preference).

    I've got a guy at work that hangs with custom truck guys (slammers), and he keeps dropping hints that he and his buddies could "bag" my '39. Being a drag car builder for so many years my mindset has always been to keep the accessories and vehicle weight to the minimum. Eventually I took what I feel is the traditional route and lowered the'39 via spring height and rate reduction. Yeah I can't adjust it from an asphalt dragger to speed bump jumper on the fly, but then again I also don't have a trunk full of pump and air tank.

    In the end though, I guess I'm not really building my car to suit any click, club, or show requirements, but for myself and possible future buyers with like minds. But to me this air bag thing just rings back to the ol' hydro days (is this part of the evolution?).
     
  2. MengesTwinCustoms
    Joined: Oct 16, 2009
    Posts: 279

    MengesTwinCustoms
    Member

    I dunno but i had air bags on my 51 ford and ahve them on my 47 buick and whether they are traditional or not i think they are fun! people like to watch and i think a car laying frame just looks awesome.
     
  3. codeblu
    Joined: May 11, 2006
    Posts: 606

    codeblu
    Member

    The Rod and Custom Dream Truck was bagged.
     
  4. fuzzy bunny
    Joined: Feb 28, 2007
    Posts: 448

    fuzzy bunny
    Member

    The ala kart had bags inside the springs and air ride became an option for gm's in 58.
     

  5. Now I'm no expert so I'm sure someone will correct my mistakes.

    For a true traditional system it would have to consist of WWII air craft hydraulics. That is what they used back in the day and then it eventually changed to air. Big bucks to go true traditional but definetly a neat set-up.
     
  6. Ive got a full set of four way bags waiting to go in my Caddy. Over here in OZ we drive a long long way to get to car shows and i want the look but retain that 1960 Caddy ride..Go the bags!!!!:cool::cool::cool::cool:
     
  7. pinky49
    Joined: Jan 3, 2009
    Posts: 119

    pinky49
    Member

    you could get air ride on '58 fairlanes and cad had them in the late '50s also.
    ed
     
  8. Special Ed
    Joined: Nov 1, 2007
    Posts: 7,995

    Special Ed
    Member

    Run 'em if you want 'em. The pump and tank can be kept very small and you will still have plenty of trunk space. They will be invisible on a '39, and the ride will be improved greatly. Good luck...
     
  9. Spity
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 438

    Spity
    Member

    I think the traditional police have been slacking around here lately, just enjoy your car traditional or not.
     
  10. paul hoffman
    Joined: Apr 17, 2007
    Posts: 44

    paul hoffman
    Member
    from australia

    They were available as an extra on 1958 Fords had a few problem and Ford did not sell a lot
     
    Last edited: Dec 15, 2009
  11. Hooligan63
    Joined: Mar 1, 2009
    Posts: 1,343

    Hooligan63
    Member

    Hydraulic systems on cars as a custom didn't come about until 1959 with Ron Aguirre's X-Sonic Corvette. Air bag suspension was experimented with in the late 30's and implemented in factory vehicles beginning with Cadillac in late 1957,and magazines were putting out tech articles on how to modify your ride for air suspension setups in 1958:

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  12. Hooligan63
    Joined: Mar 1, 2009
    Posts: 1,343

    Hooligan63
    Member

  13. Lowmerc50
    Joined: Apr 25, 2008
    Posts: 589

    Lowmerc50

    I would say to bag it. Its a lot better on your car
     
  14. DE SOTO
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 3,857

    DE SOTO
    Member


    Every one of these set ups were Air Helper Systems, All ran Air Inside a Spring .

    NONE of them were the Body Dragging Up & Down Systems People think are so Cool today.

    Why do you Air Bag Guys always go back to This when the "Traditional" Question is asked ???

    If you like Bags, Its YOUR car and you will do as you Please.

    I think Chopping up your Frame, Removing your Suspension & replacing it with Air Bags is Lunacy.

    I cant stand it when someone pulls in a show and has to show everyone they have bags by Creeping in real low & then "PSSSSHHHHT" lift it to go over a crack in the pavement "PSSHHT-PSSHHT" drop it back down.

    Just Fucking Annoying ..
     
  15. nutajunka
    Joined: Jan 24, 2007
    Posts: 1,464

    nutajunka

    I alway's heard of double bagging it, if you just meet the women for a one night stand, if that helps?
     
  16. 59 brook
    Joined: Jun 12, 2005
    Posts: 1,016

    59 brook
    Member

    you don't even need a comp some of the lowriders and minitruckers use a nitrogen tank setup for speed
     
  17. Mayflower had bags on their trailers in the late '50s that I know of.

    So if you are haluing furnature coast to coast then they are traditional as hell.

    Who really cares trad is a pretty broad term these days. Just build it the way you want and let the chips fall where they may.

    With all the '70s crap being called trad these days I can't imagine that anyone could bithc about how you build one anyway.
     
  18. What are your thoughts on hydraulics? Same as air?
     
  19. slickschoppers
    Joined: Mar 15, 2007
    Posts: 160

    slickschoppers
    Member
    from Iowa

    I've only been here a short time compared to most. but I've noticed that the "traditional" vrs "non-traditional" is a loose definition at best.

    there are HAMB cars i've seen on here built with only parts that were ORIGINALLY PRODUCED in the 50's or later. but not many.

    it has been said in this post that the only air systems were WWII hydro's or that they were in a spring... OK.. I'm no expert i'll believe that..

    it is also true that you would not have used japanese or chinese bolts, nuts, fasteners, shocks, fuel line, glass ect...

    where do you draw the line? do the parts have to be made by the same original manufacturer that has been out of buisiness for 50 years? or are you allowed to substitute parts that are made today, possibly better with more features.

    then there is the theory, well the air bag systems were experimental. heck alot of the stuff hot rodders did then and today is experimental. it is not stock that is the whole point.

    so do you go with truely authentic traditional (only parts manufactured before 64) , or traditional in spirit with newly produced parts?

    are you building a hot rod, or restoring a vintage hot rod, I find irony in the guys that say that a restoration is not there cup of tea, but spend months watching ebay to find a vintage NOS hot rod intake manifold for a flat head 8 and then spend a ton of cash on it..... funny that is what restoration guys do......

    I guess it all depends on who you are building your car for,, yourself, or to garner attention and acceptance from others? build it for yourself, build it to be kool, build it to get the girl, build it to make friends, build it to show off how much money you have, build it for the love of working on cars, it doesn't matter why at the end of the day just that you built it yourself.

    that is what seems to make these posts so emotional. if a group says air bags are the coolest, and another guy doesn't have them,,, well then his car isn't in the cool group anymore,, if another group says that they are not cool then bagged cars aren't in the cool group anymore.

    myself, i never hung out in the kool group in High School, didn't much care what there opinion was, and don't do it now....

    if you want an answer to a question like this the real place to go is all of the hotrod magazines that make there living off of deciding what is kool at the moment and what is not. every couple of years change your car to fit the mold.

    myself (and a ton of others here) we will build them for ourselves and like it or not i'll drive the hell out of it.

    I'm not planning on chopping the top on my car either.... I like it just the way it is and there were tons of hot rods back in the day with stock tops on them...... but I love the looks of a properly chopped top!!!

    my 53 I plan to lower with Jamco lowering shocks in the front, and blocks in the rear. because it will fit the look i'm going for, but i'm only droppin it 2 or 3 inches.

    but i still can appreciate the bagged cars too.....

    just like my 5 year old LOVES flame thrower exhaust. he saw a set at a car show and was wowed....LOL.... I could care less about them,, but he thinks it's the koolest..... now HIS opinion I care about.....

    Question = are airbags traditional?
    Answer = who cares?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.