Register now to get rid of these ads!

Ford 9" needs to get wider

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by t6chan, Mar 2, 2009.

  1. t6chan
    Joined: Jul 29, 2008
    Posts: 19

    t6chan
    Member
    from GTA

    So I am working on a 31 Model A sedan project. The cars ride height should be around 4-5" from the ground to the bottom of the body. I have cut about 14" from the bottom of the body up for the rear axle but my problem is, I have a 61.5" wide flange to flange 9" axle. The back plates are rubbing on the body...

    After reading on this board; 65 - 67" is the ideal flange to flange. I have a few questions, hoping someone can help! The last thing I want to do is find another 9" and cut the brackets off that I have already welded.

    1. How much clearance is you you guys typically have on the low sedan from body to tire? from back plate to body?

    2. Are there any other solutions? I did see someone on this forum who had the same situation and took the back plate off, put on discs and welded on a caliper bracket. In addition, he had custom rims made up with 2" back spacing.

    3. Can I cut the axle tubes and extend them? Then buy new axle shafts?

    Thx for any replies. Looking for ideas... Im stumped.
     
  2. pasadenahotrod
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 11,775

    pasadenahotrod
    Member
    from Texas

    Channeling does not mean w-w-w-w-w-w-whacking off the bottom 14" of the body!
    You have moved up to the widest part of the body by doing this.
    In my life I've only heard of this one time before, was the bottom 14" that rotten?
     
  3. t6chan
    Joined: Jul 29, 2008
    Posts: 19

    t6chan
    Member
    from GTA

    Here is an image to help visualize the stance.
    [​IMG]

    I had 1x1 tubing bent and followed the contour around the body. Your right, it is at the widest part of the body.
     
  4. Deuce Roadster
    Joined: Sep 8, 2002
    Posts: 9,519

    Deuce Roadster
    Member Emeritus

    It would a LOT easier and less expensive to just go get a Ford pickup rear end from a 1973-1986 Ford F-150 Pickup which is 65.25 inches wide :D

    look here

    http://carnut.com/specs/rear.html
     

  5. MIKE47
    Joined: Aug 19, 2005
    Posts: 987

    MIKE47
    Member
    from new jersey

    You need the widest rear ford made for your application. You need a F150 pick-up housing. They were about 66" I think. I did a '29 sedan last year and used one for it. I went with 15x7 wheels from coker and put 10.5" radir slicks on it. There was about 1 1/2"- 2" clearance to the body. It also had 5x5 1/2" bolt circle to match the fronts.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    I did another Model A chassis this fall. A '30. I used a narrower '77 t-bird rear and it would never make it on there if it were as low as yours unless you had wheel adapters/spacers to push the wheels out wider.

    Oh and cutting off the brackets from the f150 are much easier than most other rears.
     
  6. t6chan
    Joined: Jul 29, 2008
    Posts: 19

    t6chan
    Member
    from GTA

    Thanks for the help.

    <TABLE cellSpacing=2 cellPadding=2 width="100%" border=2><TBODY><TR><TD align=middle>61.25</TD><TD align=left>1957-1972</TD><TD>Ford F-100 Pickup</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
    This is the one i have on it right now...
    Everything is in solid...

    http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/showthread.php?t=322224&highlight=qmotox+rear+end

    This is the link i found with the guy who made it work. I wonder how this thing worked out...
     
  7. Which guy are you refering to?

    X2 on what Leaky Pipes said. You need to do a lot of measuring to figure everything out.

    My A Sedan sits pretty low 3-4" of ground cleance. I'm using a 9" out of a 60" Galaxie. It is 61.5" wheel mounting surface to wheel mounting surface. This was the widest 9" I could find that still had a center pinion. You can find wider ones but then they have a offset pinion. I center pinion is kinda important when you get the car real low and the driveshaft is running right between the seats. With a offset pinion your passenger seat would have to be smaller. Even with the wide 9" I ran I still couldn't get drum brakes and backing plates to clear the body. I ended up running disc on the rear with the calipers on the bottom side of the axle. I also had to have the wheels made 16x7 with a 2" backspace.
    [​IMG]
    <!-- / message -->
     
  8. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,422

    64 DODGE 440
    Member
    from so cal

    Just cut some wheel wells into the side of the body.
     
  9. pasadenahotrod
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 11,775

    pasadenahotrod
    Member
    from Texas

    Where is the bleeder on those calipers, is it the camera angle or are they really upside down?
     
  10. t6chan
    Joined: Jul 29, 2008
    Posts: 19

    t6chan
    Member
    from GTA

    Yep, thats the guy. I've PM'd him already.

    So would 1" spacing be acceptable? from tire sidewall to side of the body?
    Mike47, i really like those wheels! The cheater slicks look awsome! Will you chop the car in the future?
     
  11. MIKE47
    Joined: Aug 19, 2005
    Posts: 987

    MIKE47
    Member
    from new jersey

    Belongs to a customer but that is the plan. He has to put some new wood in it first, then I'll whack it down a bit. I think Leaky Pipes used the same rear in his '29 too. That statement about wheel backspacing is true but a 61" rear is gonna cut it real close unless you use the adapters/spacers. I've used them and and just don't care for them. More work to get to the brakes, more lug nuts, etc. and probably cost the same as another axle housing.
     
  12. QMOTOX
    Joined: Jun 8, 2008
    Posts: 89

    QMOTOX
    Member
    from STL, MO

    t6chan I got your PM but thought I would go ahead and answer you back on this thread so everyone could see too. I went back and pulled up some older pics during the build too.

    Shows how low the car sits 3-4"
    [​IMG]

    Pic to show tire clearance to body
    [​IMG]

    Shows pinion, driveshaft and trans right down the center of the car
    [​IMG]

    Disc brake hat and caliper
    [​IMG]

    The rearend is 61.25" WMS to WMS the disc brake hats add another 1/4" to each side for 61.75" overall. The calipers and weld on brackets for them came from Speedway as a kit. The bleeder on the caliper points strait up and they bleed fine mounted like they are.

    The wheels are 16x7 with 2" backspace. They were made by Early Wheel. Jason is here on the HAMB and was good to work with on these wheels. They are a multibolt pattern. My rearend is 5 on 4.5"

    MIKE47...Does the F-150 rearend have the pinion in the center?
     
  13. QMOTOX
    Joined: Jun 8, 2008
    Posts: 89

    QMOTOX
    Member
    from STL, MO

    A couple more pics from the build to answer a few more questions.

    Shows the slot cut in the body for the axle.
    [​IMG]

    Frame and body are sitting on the ground but it shows where the axle sits at ride height. Being so low the stock drums would have never let me set the axle up in the body this high.
    [​IMG]
     
  14. Weasel
    Joined: Dec 30, 2007
    Posts: 6,698

    Weasel
    Member

    Anybody heard of scrub line? Anyone understand why it is important not to have any part of the frame, suspension or body below it?
     
  15. t6chan
    Joined: Jul 29, 2008
    Posts: 19

    t6chan
    Member
    from GTA

    Thanks QMOTOX, I think i might be going the route you took. I see the kit you are talking about. How do you find the speedway kit? does it seem to work well? Have you put any mileage on them yet?

    And I am guessing that if you have the 2" back spacing on the wheels you wont require any wheel spacers?

    What distance are the rubbers from the body?
     
  16. QMOTOX
    Joined: Jun 8, 2008
    Posts: 89

    QMOTOX
    Member
    from STL, MO

    The Speedway kit works well. Its just GM metric calipers and wilwood brake hats pretty basic stuff. I put about 600 miles on the car October through December last year when it was together. Plan on a proportioning valve for the rear brkes I did have to turn mine down a bit they work that well.

    No wheel spacers except the disc brake hat that adds 1/4" per side. I did put some slightly longer wheel studs in.

    Tires clear the body by about an inch. No rub marks on the body yet.
     
  17. Leaky Pipes
    Joined: Jan 11, 2005
    Posts: 596

    Leaky Pipes
    Member

    I used a 9 inch out of a 78 Ford Bronco.

    Dont forget to take into consideration your wheel offset/backspacing

    Hey Mike, is that Shauns sedan in the pic?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.