Register now to get rid of these ads!

need C4 help

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by punkabilly1306, Aug 9, 2008.

  1. punkabilly1306
    Joined: Aug 22, 2005
    Posts: 2,655

    punkabilly1306
    Member
    from ohio

    im swapping out motors in the car now (302) and the old motor was a '88 lincoln and now im using a '77 ford. went to bolt the bellhousing up to the new ('77) motor and realized that the flywheel is smaller then the old one and now the holes wont line up on the torque converter. My question is, would it hurt to swap out the '88s torque converter for the '77s even tho the '77s is smaller. Both motors had a c4 behind them
    thanks
    bob
     
  2. fiftyv8
    Joined: Mar 11, 2007
    Posts: 5,394

    fiftyv8
    Member
    from CO & WA

    Good question I have a similar problem just have not got to finishing my swap yet.
    Be interested to read an informed response.
    I think Chevy's can have the same interchange suprises as well!

    Come on you tranny guys you all can not be at Bonneville.
     
  3. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    ...
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2008
  4. 66Stang
    Joined: Nov 8, 2007
    Posts: 8

    66Stang
    Member

    Wouldn't the '88 flexplate be balanced to 50oz, while the '77 should be 28oz?
     

  5. Zig Zag Wanderer
    Joined: Jul 6, 2007
    Posts: 563

    Zig Zag Wanderer
    Member

    the '88 torque converter is a lock-up type, the '77 is not. the '88 trans you have; IF it looks like a c4, is not actually a c4... its a lock-up version of a c5. bellhousing depth, front pump and torque converter are different between c4 and c5.

    however, you said it came out of an '88 lincoln, which would have used an AOD instead. AOD's would have a different torque converter pattern as you seem to indicate. post pics if you can. c5's were used in v6 t-birds & cougars as late as 88
     
  6. Zig Zag Wanderer
    Joined: Jul 6, 2007
    Posts: 563

    Zig Zag Wanderer
    Member

    yes, 66stang is correct. 50oz imbalance started production 11/82-up. one more thing to watch with this stuff
     
  7. Dirk35
    Joined: Mar 8, 2001
    Posts: 2,067

    Dirk35
    Member


    You can get the 164 and the 157 tooth flexplates in either weight configuration.

    I think that the Bell housing and Flexplate I have in the classifieds go together, but youll want to do the research b4 buying either, but Im not for sure, you'd have to do the research. FWIW, You have to get the flexplate that has the balance weight to your crank and balancer.
     
  8. 66Stang
    Joined: Nov 8, 2007
    Posts: 8

    66Stang
    Member

    Oh I know, just wanted to clear up any possible confusion since SlowandLow63 said he would just swap flexplates from one engine to the other, even though they have a different imbalance. Least that's how I read it, sorry for any confusion.
     
  9. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    Ya I must've had an out of body experience. I just read my post and said WTF!?!?!

    I think what's going on is he had an '88 motor that would've had an AOD behind cept he got the car having a C4 behind it. So it should have the correct flexplate and yes, be balanced to 50oz. I think his issue is still 157T vs. 164T in which case he needs to buy the correct plate (164T, 28oz) for the '77 motor.

    Provided of course this is the actual situation and BoBOhi0 here isnt fooling us on what trans were behind each motor. Though I didn't know there was a difference in bolt patterns between the 2 flexplates. Maybe I'm still way off base, who knows.
     
  10. punkabilly1306
    Joined: Aug 22, 2005
    Posts: 2,655

    punkabilly1306
    Member
    from ohio

    ok i found some info online about different years of c4's, and between a 10 year gap ford decided to expand the converters bolt diameter by almost an inch in length. So I took the converter/flexplate/balancer from the '77s motor and threw it in the c4 i already had in the car and everything bolted up great. So hopefully today i'll be able to get it fired up and if it shakes like a mofo then we know our answer LOL
     
  11. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    No shit, you learn something new everyday. So you ended up just swapping converters?
     
  12. punkabilly1306
    Joined: Aug 22, 2005
    Posts: 2,655

    punkabilly1306
    Member
    from ohio


    yeah i swapped convertes, along with the flexplate and harmonic balancer...that way i knew everything was the same weights and so hopefully it stays in balance
     
  13. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    Wait so what balancer with what motor with what flexplate?

    If the motor is the '77 you need to have the '77 balancer, crank, and flexplate. Otherwise your out of balance. The '77 is 28oz and the '88 is 50oz, I completey overlooked that in my first post.
     
  14. punkabilly1306
    Joined: Aug 22, 2005
    Posts: 2,655

    punkabilly1306
    Member
    from ohio


    yes billy i swapped everything out so everything is the same weight
     
  15. Jeff Walker
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 498

    Jeff Walker
    Member

    So then you have a 1988 crank balancer and flex plate an engine with a 1977 crank? If so, it's not going to work right as the two cranks are balanced differently and need the matching balancer and flex plate.
     
  16. SlowandLow63
    Joined: Sep 18, 2004
    Posts: 5,958

    SlowandLow63
    Member
    from Central NJ

    That what it sounded like to me, lemme call him to make sure. I think wer are getting lost in translation here.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.