Register now to get rid of these ads!

392 intake on a 354 Hemi

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Rob Paul, Jul 28, 2008.

  1. Rob Paul
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 1,272

    Rob Paul
    Member

    Is this possible? I picked up a crager 4x2 for a Hemi. Its for a 392. Is there any way to make it work on a 354?

    I know the 392 has a 1/4" taller deck height, putting the heads farther apart at the intake mount. I just wanna know if anyone has made this setup work.

    Thanks, ROB
     
  2. lippy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2006
    Posts: 6,826

    lippy
    Member
    from Ks

    Build a 392? Seriously, never thought about it. I know you can buy spacer plates, I have some, for a 331-354 onto a 392. The Hot Heads manifold requires spacers when using on a 392. Interesting. Not enough meat on the flanges probably to mill it? Prob be out of whack somehow. Guys? Lippy
     
  3. 41hemi
    Joined: Jul 2, 2007
    Posts: 1,000

    41hemi
    Member

    The 392 intake will work on the 354. All intakes will interchange unless you use 331-354 heads on the 392; then you need the spacers.
     
  4. lippy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2006
    Posts: 6,826

    lippy
    Member
    from Ks

    Thats the deal!!!!! DUH. :eek:
     

  5. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,257

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Correct, all the manifolds are the same width. The 392 heads have intake ports that are "longer" to make up for the additional deck height. So it's only when you use the 331-354 heads on the taller deck 392 block that you need the spacers.
     
  6. panic
    Joined: Jan 3, 2004
    Posts: 1,450

    panic

    The factory 392 manifolds are also the worst - the carb center section was depressed for hood clearance.
     
  7. Rob Paul
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 1,272

    Rob Paul
    Member

    Let me go take a picture so you can see what Im talking about.

    ROB
     
  8. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    Panic said it, the 392 intake is not desirable. That's why there are spacers to put the 354 piece on the 392. No reason you can't do it, just not the best setup.
    Of course, the Cragar might be made different to the stocker.
     
  9. Rob Paul
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 1,272

    Rob Paul
    Member

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    In the second pic I slid it back to show the mount holes.

    ROB
     
  10. You have 392 heads on a 354. there is no intake made for this application.You nead to get 331 or 354 heads.
     
  11. man-a-fre
    Joined: Apr 13, 2005
    Posts: 1,311

    man-a-fre
    Member

  12. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,257

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yup, you've got tall-deck heads on a short deck motor, no way a spacer can fix that. The only solution I can think of is that you IMMEDIATELY ship that manifold and carbs to me so I can confirm that it does fit on a 392.
     
  13. 41hemi
    Joined: Jul 2, 2007
    Posts: 1,000

    41hemi
    Member

    Post the casting numbers of the heads so we can absolutely verify what you have. If they are cast 1731528 then you indeed have the 392 heads.
     
  14. I've never really looked at a 392 head closely but is there enough meat on the intake side to mill it down to fit a std intake right?
     
  15. Rob Paul
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 1,272

    Rob Paul
    Member

    Guess I never checked the heads. The block is a NE56. 354 Block. The heads are 1731528 castings. Assumed they were 354 heads.

    Guess the whole setup is junk. Cast scrap is getting pretty high. Aluminum too. Should be able to scrap it all out and go buy a SBC with the money.


    Thanks alot for the help!!!!

    ROB
     
  16. 283nova
    Joined: Jun 5, 2008
    Posts: 222

    283nova
    Member
    from spokane,wa

    come on now that would be ignorant to scrap it, sell it to someone who needs those parts scrapping it would be very selfish.:eek:
     
  17. titus
    Joined: Dec 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,145

    titus
    Member

    ill swap you some 354 heads for the intake, then youll be ok, well kinda, youll just have to find another intake:)
     
  18. I SMELL SMOKE
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 1,527

    I SMELL SMOKE
    Member

    looks like it will need new heads or a u fab it intake
     
  19. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,726

    George
    Member

    you need 55 331 or 56 354 heads. Not only won't a production intake fit( except twin log or a U-Fab that you actaully put together yourself), but the water crossover won't fit either.
     
  20. Rob Paul
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 1,272

    Rob Paul
    Member

    Getting this intake was the jumpstart I needed to get going again on my coupe project. I was just using the bare block and heads to mock everything up. Wish I would have found out I had 392 heads before I built the headers. They might work yet. If they move at all it will only be 1/4".

    Thanks, and if you wanna trade some 354 for some 392 heads let me know!!

    ROB

    [​IMG]
     
  21. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    The headers will work perfectly on the 354 heads. That side of the heads didn't change.
     
  22. As soon as you said it i thought it was a great idea... but the '92s look like the port is lowered instead of the having a cast-in spacer. The only way to do this that I can see is to raise the ports, fill the bottoms and relocate the 7 billion bolts that hold the intake on (big blocks have 8?...)

    no hope for those homeless 392 heads.....
     
  23. RichFox
    Joined: Dec 3, 2006
    Posts: 10,020

    RichFox
    Member Emeritus

    The bad news is that 354 heads were the heads of choice when fuel racers were running old iron Chryslers. I had all kinds of 392 heads when I sold out of hemi stuff. But the only 354 heads I had I was running. But you can find something I'm sure.
     
  24. Dyce
    Joined: Sep 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,973

    Dyce
    Member

    Looks to me like you could mill the intake to fit the heads you have. There are tables that used to come in automotive surface grinder manuals that could give you the amount. You just use the difference in deck height. The figgure for a sbc was .125 off the intake for every .100 off the head. I'm thinking the 90 degree angle would be (difference in decks)X150% (.375) off each side of the intake. Looks like enough meat in the intake.

    Then you have a unique intake that you could never run on a 392. It would be a waste in my opinion.
     
  25. I have a set of 354 heads I am willing to sell. Pm me for more info. Mike
     
  26. Shaggy
    Joined: Mar 6, 2003
    Posts: 5,207

    Shaggy
    Member
    from Sultan, WA

    OR run a 2 piece log manifold, one of the ones that is connected in the center by rubber hose
     
  27. bigmike
    Joined: May 17, 2007
    Posts: 53

    bigmike
    Member


    The angle of the intake gasket face on the 331/354/392 hemi is much greater than 90 Deg.... I don't think you could mill enough off to make it work....
     
  28. Dyce
    Joined: Sep 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,973

    Dyce
    Member

    Yep... I see that now. My mistake. [​IMG]
    It's more like a sbc. I'm going to try to scrounge up the manual from my old mill. I may still have it around. See if there is a table I can scan.
    Jeff
     
  29. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 30,787

    The37Kid
    Member

    Rob, Thanks for posting the photo, someday I hope to put my '30 roadster body on '32 rails and put a 354 Hemi in it. Looks like everythig fits nicely, did you have to cut away any of the firewall?
     
  30. Jeff Norwell
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 14,846

    Jeff Norwell
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    Rob.... your hemi powered A on deuce rails is bitch'in
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.