Register now to get rid of these ads!

KB Internationa help

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Juggalo56, May 17, 2008.

  1. Juggalo56
    Joined: Dec 10, 2006
    Posts: 79

    Juggalo56
    Member

    Hey guys im working on a 47 KB3 International. I dont have any suspension and I was planning on running an IFS setup but I was wondering if anyone knows what the original track width of the K or KB 1-3 was? These were built from 41-49. I know guys run s-10 chassis alot which are 58 inch and some guys run mustang II which is 56.5 but I still would like to know what the original hub to hub track width was on these old IH trucks.
    thanks
    Dave
     
  2. Juggalo56
    Joined: Dec 10, 2006
    Posts: 79

    Juggalo56
    Member

    BTT for the day time
     
  3. LowFat48
    Joined: Aug 28, 2005
    Posts: 910

    LowFat48
    Member

    the listed track width in my manual is 58 9/32 "
     

  4. Terraizer
    Joined: Jul 18, 2006
    Posts: 521

    Terraizer
    Member

    They are around 60" wheel mounting surface to wheel mounting surface. I'am doing a S-10 chassis under my 1942 K-2 in the next week are so. I would love to do the Dakota front end under my 1955 S-100 but Phoenix is to far to haul it plus i would like to do the work myself.
     
  5. krooser
    Joined: Jul 25, 2004
    Posts: 4,584

    krooser
    Member

    Fatman can do a MII on that chassis...at least they would several years ago when I had my last KB1
     
  6. Juggalo56
    Joined: Dec 10, 2006
    Posts: 79

    Juggalo56
    Member

    Thanks guys. i knew i could get a quick answer on here.

    ELpolacko thats is some awesome work. you just gave me so many ideas my brain is going in every direction possible. Where do you get all the components and setup for the dakota front end. is that somethin you just studied and measured the Original then set it up with new parts. building your own brakets or did you take a dead frame from a Dakota and mold it into a new frame?

    Thanks again. i love this site
    Dave
     
  7. Each one of those was a one off deal. I didn't make any patterns, but both of them I sort of modified some of the stuff that I make for other applications. I free built each one instead of building a jig like I do for the other stuff.

    Now with my new equipment it makes more sense to keep copies on file for future reference.
     
  8. Juggalo56
    Joined: Dec 10, 2006
    Posts: 79

    Juggalo56
    Member

    you definatly do some great work. And like i said i now have so many things to think about. and i like the direction you took with the extra tube work on the frame for extra support and rigidity of the frame.

    thanks again
    Dave
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.