Register now to get rid of these ads!

Not your Granmaaaw's BANGER

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Bluto, Sep 11, 2007.

  1. DocWatson
    Joined: Mar 24, 2006
    Posts: 10,280

    DocWatson
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It was tomorrow here yesterday, so c'mon what is it??
     
  2. Andrew Williams
    Joined: Feb 20, 2007
    Posts: 223

    Andrew Williams
    Member

    As for the Id it looks like a Ford tractor engine but I have a 39-40 one in the driveway and it is not . they have valves in the block and part of the bellhousing with the starter hole is cast on the back of the block. It still looks like a tractor engine to me but i might be wrong.
    Andy
     
  3. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    I've given up guessing. bluto has something so oddball (but I'm guessing just as cool) that he's just ringing the bell to make us drool
     
  4. Revhead
    Joined: Mar 19, 2001
    Posts: 3,027

    Revhead
    Member
    from Dallas, TX

    haha just what I was thinking.. now where's the answer!!?
     
  5. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    It's tomorrow here...

    But it's 1982 in Poland...

    I thought I knew what that block was about 15 times untill I looked closer...

    Ford-Indy experimental? Fergason? Fronty? IDK... My BFF Jill...
     
  6. Chris P
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 429

    Chris P
    Member
    from Tucson

    Is it Funk? Looks like a Ford meant to hang upside down.
     
  7. Bluto
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 5,113

    Bluto
    Member Emeritus

    It's much earlier than a HAL

    According to my friend who's Dad collected more banger racing stuff than anyone you'll ever meet it's built by Harry Miller to accept aftermarket double cam heads for Model A

    This explains the workmanship

    The boss on the side is to support the water pump/mag drive

    It is strictly a external oil pump engine. Drilled for full pressure to the rods and mains but you must drill and machine your own pickup

    If you look close you'll notice most of the bolt holes are not drilled and tapped yet. This is NOS

    There is a spot machined for an idle gear where the cam should be

    The block has no place for cam,ports,or pushrods it is strictly OHC single or double.......

    The extra pad on top is to allow you to fit heads built for the wider A block

    Is it Miller? Don't know the only guy I know that could tell me is dead
    But that does kindda fit. I aave a Miller marine cylinder block and the
    workmanship is the same

    If you look close at Bill's stuff you'll see that most of the block side covers are covering ports too......

    There are several differing HAL A/B block heads:

    First single cam cam cover is bolted around the ourside and the box is almost flat on top

    The first double cam head uses covers in this style... My HAL DOHC head is #006

    Chain drive is a very different style to the as are the cam tower and bearing arangement

    My guess is only the cams and buckets are the same early and late

    Late cam covers are held down with studs thru them..... these are set in the cam bearing caps

    This block was set up to be universal ..... if it were just for HAL is would need the spot for idler gear where the cam used to be

    I think B/C Blocks worked pretty good. Once people started using them and had them to use they were cheap and easy THIS CHUNK WASN'T CHEAP OR EASY

    It would follow that HAL and others might go back to this 5 main design
    in their mid 30's engines to get a more stable platform for long distance races

    So it's tomorrow

    What do you think? That's why I started this. To see what you all think
     
  8. Kilroy
    Joined: Aug 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,227

    Kilroy
    Member
    from Orange, Ca

    I think it's really awesome...

    It'd be the perfect block for the lakes or Bonny becuause you could try different ohc head combinations and wouldn't be limited to finding one that fit just one style of block.

    Can you use modern main bearings or is it a babbit deal?

    How much would it hurt if you punched a rod through it on a timing pass, though?

    Any idea of the quality of the material in the block?
     
  9. Bluto
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 5,113

    Bluto
    Member Emeritus

    It's good close grain cast iron

    The main webbing is solid top to bottom

    I haven't weighed it but my guess is it's almost as heavy as a ''B/C'' with a cam and valve gear in place

    I'm making new main caps it has thin shells with shimmed caps. Not the best idea

    I'll make the caps at least pinned if not four bolt
     
  10. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    all I can say is WOW. I was pretty close with my first guess! wonder how much it would cost to send it to a foundry to have them copy it?? wouldn't that REALLY be the dogs bullocks!

    getting it in semi finished state is pretty disconcerting though. makes me wonder if they had a problem during the machining process that made them decide to stop. most NOS pieces this old weren't used for a reason. definitely check it over 200% before doing anything with it. core shift, misalignment etc. did the crank turn ok?

    I'm sure none of that is a news flash but things that crossed my mind. Coming from a company that has brand new pretty aerospace parts in a "display case" up front that are all scrap it crosses my mind often when I find things like that.

    I have to admit I was perplexed as to why the casting extended to cover where the valves would be when there were no holes in that section of the block!


    also, I have read about the miller marine engines. which one do you have? the 151? it crossed my mind that this might have been one.
     
  11. fur biscuit
    Joined: Jul 22, 2005
    Posts: 7,831

    fur biscuit
    ALLIANCE MEMBER


    other than it would be great to have a proper looksee. thanks for not posting a "whats it worth thread"...not that you would.

    so how about a picture of the head that is going on it? :)
     
  12. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    ok, so lets put my little bit of research out here. if this fits in the time frame you are thinking of 1930-ish (before ford comes out with a bit better banger block) that puts it at the time when miller retires from his racing business and goes out on his own. (1930-33) anyone know any of the projects that miller has done during this time frame? appears that this is when the design work for the offy predecessor was done. could this have been the economy offshoot of his "offy" work?? before his business was forcibly bankrupt in 1933 (possibly why you would find an unfinished block)
     
  13. Bluto
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 5,113

    Bluto
    Member Emeritus

    Furrie

    Goes in here Mrs Bluto's race car....... With these old carbs and head

    got get some rods, pistons,and a really good pan

    The car needs a real go thru too........
     

    Attached Files:

  14. Stovebolt
    Joined: May 2, 2001
    Posts: 3,535

    Stovebolt
    Member

    It took all my strength not to tell :)
     
  15. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    hmmmm

    did some more research. seems leo goossen (miller's engineer) did some design work for riley brett as well as design work for miller-schofield during the 29-31 time period. one of the things he designed was a dohc head for schofield in 29. only three were made. sounds reasonable that during this time frame he would try to design an engine block for riley or schofield.

    were the marine blocks iron? I have yet to see any reference to a cast iron block designed by miller. Doesn't seem like something that miller would want. possibly something he would design to a customer requirement though??
     
  16. Bluto
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 5,113

    Bluto
    Member Emeritus

    This isn't just going to bolt together.........

    There's a lot of design and build to do

    And the best guy to help in laughing at me from his place at the top of a sunny hill......... long buried..... He lived 4-bangers

    Next week I'll offer up all the front drive stuff and let you know i this will work or not

    Couple things ...... bore centers differ from HAL's head so sleeve and offset bore. The bronze main caps are not going to work. Nor the thin bearing shells that are fitted.

    The cranks snout is too short

    HAL's oil pump design isn't good

    You can bet the side water pump and and mag drive will no doubt take some fiddl'n

    The whole mess would be easier if I could use a "B'' Block and I have all that. But I must work to a rule book that states "pre 32"

    I'm not complanin' winter's are long here. It may take two but it will run
     
  17. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    hold up, you're going to offset the cylinders to the crankshaft centers?? if this is based off of a ford setup why are the bores not on ford centers (which I'm assuming the hal heads are)? how big are the bores right now??

    if this was made as you say to take ford conversion heads then you've just disproved yourself. maybe this is the reason it was never built?
     
  18. Bluto
    Joined: Feb 15, 2005
    Posts: 5,113

    Bluto
    Member Emeritus

    It's itty-bitty but I gotta do it!

    You think I'm using FORD RODS???????

    Crank pins are in the right place
     
  19. revkev6
    Joined: Jun 13, 2006
    Posts: 3,350

    revkev6
    Member
    from ma

    how much is itty bitty? if it's not on ford centers, it wasn't meant to be used with just any ford ohc conversion. must have been a very specific setup.

    unless you mean the crankshaft is correct for ford centers but the block is not? could be core shift if that's the case.
     
  20. Man... and to think you found this in a scrap yard... WOW! :D

    Good thing you wrote your name on the side of it so they didn't toss it!

    Seriously though... are the center lines for the rods the same as the center lines for the OHC head's bore centers? i.e. the only thing off is the bores in the block?

    Would the valves hit the cylinder walls?

    Sam.
     
  21. norbyrattler
    Joined: Dec 7, 2006
    Posts: 160

    norbyrattler
    BANNED
    from Colorado

    Hey There Four Bangers, I have seen this before, Frankland of Frankland rear ends had some of these in his Storage area. I visited him about twenty years ago in Tampa. I think he said he had them made up to compete with Offys in midget race cars. These are vaguely similar to Ford but was intended to be a separate entity Kinda like Sesco is to the Iron Duke. I have or have had Millers, Offies, Gallivans, Briskos, Hals, Rajos, Hissos, Bugattis, Cragers, 3 port Chevs, Olds, and of course Gemsas. While no one knows everything about these, we need to collect and preserve them. I recently sold a home made "OFFY" to Speedy Bill that someone had poured their life blood into. The builder is long forgotten but you could see amazing craftsmanship and ingenuity as he solved problems like fabbing a block from steel sheets and welded in cylinders. A study of the American race motor and its derivatives can occupy an entire lifetime. Some people are jealous of people with collections and museums but these guys are saving our past. Good on ya!
    Norb
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.