Register now to get rid of these ads!

piston size and compression ratio theory

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by vanchopski, Mar 16, 2007.

  1. vanchopski
    Joined: Aug 29, 2006
    Posts: 22

    vanchopski
    Member

    I apologize if this has been covered before - I did do a search and couldn't find it anywhere in past posts.

    I'm rebuilding a 331 hemi and would like to boost static compression ratio from stock 7.5:1 to around 9:1. One obvious choice is to use domed forged pistons. But it seems to me that I could increase compression somewhat by simply boring the cylinders out to take a flat 354 piston. As diggers4life pointed out in one post I found on this topic:

    "Compression ratio is the relationship between the volume of the cylinder + combustion chamber at bottom dead center and the volume of the area it compressed into at top dead center."

    So it seems to me that if the combustion chamber stays the same size (which it will cuz I'm using 331 heads) but the cylinder volume increases (which it will cuz I'm boring out to use 354 pistons) then the compression ratio should increase. Yes? No?
     
  2. hotrawd
    Joined: Jan 24, 2007
    Posts: 193

    hotrawd
    Member
    from lima,ohio

    You are correct.
     
  3. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,593

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Overboring increases compression, but you won't get the 1.5 boost you're looking for just from that. At 7.5:1, you must have a '49-'51 engine; if you could scare up a pair of '53 heads, you'd get a boost from the smaller combustion chambers.
     
  4. Wesley
    Joined: Aug 12, 2006
    Posts: 1,670

    Wesley
    Member

    I am sure that there are math/engine gurus here that can tell you exactly how much of a C/R increase you will get, but I doubt that it will be much over 8:1. However, you will get an increase in power from both C/R and displacement, so it looks like a win/win situation to me.
     

  5. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,085

    squirrel
    Member

    331 / 8 = 41.4 cubic inches/cyl

    7.5:1 compression means the total volume of the cylinder + chamber is 7.5 times as big as the volume of just the chamber. by "chamber" I mean the area between the top of the piston and the head, so you have to take the shape of the piston and the deck height and gasket thickness into consideration, but I am lumping these all together.

    so, if the cylinder volume is 41.4 cubic inches, the chamber volume can be calculated:

    cylinder + chamber = 7.5 x chamber

    which simplifies to: cylinder = 7.5 chamber - chamber

    which simplifies to: cylinder = 6.5 chamber

    so the chamber volume is 41.4 / 6.5 = 6.36 cubic inches

    if you increase the cylinder volume to that of a 354, you get 44.2 cubes, and the compression ratio is

    cylinder + chamber / chamber

    44.2 + 6.36 / 6.36 = 7.95

    so racyredhd got it right, you get 8:1 by increasing bore size to that of a 354. But this assumes the piston dome is the same as the original piston.
     
  6. vanchopski
    Joined: Aug 29, 2006
    Posts: 22

    vanchopski
    Member

    Cool! Thanks fellas. I could probably get off my ass and try crunching the numbers myself now that I have some encouragement.
     
  7. vanchopski
    Joined: Aug 29, 2006
    Posts: 22

    vanchopski
    Member

    Oops. Too late. Thanks Squirrel.
     
  8. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,085

    squirrel
    Member

    you're welcome, someone please check my math...

    also this assumes the new deck height is the same as the old deck height, so you need to check things like piston compresion height and whatnot.
     
  9. But if you bore it you are going to have to get new pistons anyway.
    So why not just buy some domed ones at the get go and forget the bore job?
     
  10. Because unless you are getting stock type replacement pistons they are BUCKS!!! Something like $700 a set but I haven't priced them for a while.

    That being said if you are boring up to the 354 pistons you might luck out as stock 354's had compression ratios all the way up to 10:1.
     
  11. chuckspeed
    Joined: Sep 13, 2005
    Posts: 1,643

    chuckspeed
    Member

    Squirrel -

    Your numbers are pretty much on the mark.

    Smokey - Damn straight!

    Van Chop -

    There are BOATLOADS of pieces parts available for vintage Hemis, Hot Hemi Heads is the place to look. You can get popup (domed) pistons from them which will increase the CR to whatever you wish.

    A vintage hemi is a piece of jewelry, man. Call Hot Hemi Heads and discuss where you want this motor to lay out; they can hook you up, man.
     
  12. OK, so he gets it bored. How much does that cost $250+? A new set of 354 stock cast pistons runs ~$410. So you are already pushing $700 and he still isn't going to get the CR he's looking for. Then what different heads?
     
  13. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,726

    George
    Member

    51-4 engines are 7.5, '55 8.5, Don't know if they upped the compression by changing the chamber or the piston, but cast pistons for 331s are listed as 8.5.
     
  14. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,085

    squirrel
    Member

    I thought this was just a theory question
     
  15. polisher
    Joined: Jul 28, 2002
    Posts: 651

    polisher
    Alliance Vendor

    You can up the compression by removing head gasket and skimming the heads too.
    Check out any marine applications for higher compression/ performance parts.
    Used to be in England that chrysler competition components were often cheaper than standard too.
    Ya never know./...
    check it out.
     
  16. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,593

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY


    My mistake--I saw "331" and automatically thought Cadillac!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.