Register now to get rid of these ads!

Chevy 265 build up info needed

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by myke, Oct 10, 2006.

  1. Duration
    Joined: Oct 2, 2006
    Posts: 543

    Duration
    Member
    from Wayne, MI

    The 305 head tip is a good one. It brings the 265 up to modern standards.
     
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,082

    squirrel
    Member

    I guess it depends on the heads! i looked on ebay and saw a pair of 56 pp heads went unsold recently offered at $100.

    but I also looked in my barn and discovered I have a pair of these heads, I guess I ought to offload them!
     
  3. Lucky Strike
    Joined: Aug 14, 2004
    Posts: 1,665

    Lucky Strike
    Member

    Well, this is only my experience but. My current quest to fix up my 283 is the first motor I've ever worked on. After reading a bunch and becoming a little more educated I decided I wanted power pack heads to keep the traditiaonal look, and they will flow better than the stock head I have on there now.

    The very first swap meet I went to looking for a set of powr pack heads I found a pair for $60 which had already had hardened exhaust valve seats put in em....your experience may vary, but I don't think they are as hard to find as camel hump heads in good condition.


     
  4. myke
    Joined: Dec 13, 2004
    Posts: 2,134

    myke
    Member
    from SoCal

    "having been magnafluxed from a reputable Ebayer"

    is my favorite quote out of that listing
     
  5. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,082

    squirrel
    Member

    yeah, it's funny!

    I wonder why the bid went so high? I guess the heads are rare, one year only used on fuelie vettes, but maybe the matching casting dates had something to do with it? they are wierd heads, they have the bosses for bolting accessories on the ends like the 69-newer heads, but no holes drilled. and they're stagger valve cover style.
     
  6. myke
    Joined: Dec 13, 2004
    Posts: 2,134

    myke
    Member
    from SoCal

    Is there a mark that will tell you that the heads are power pack ,or is it by the part number or chamber shape?
     
  7. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 56,082

    squirrel
    Member

    the triangle on the end, dead giveaway

    [​IMG]
     
  8. Lucky Strike
    Joined: Aug 14, 2004
    Posts: 1,665

    Lucky Strike
    Member

    Wow, mine look a little differnet than that. Mine are a definitive sidways rectangle with a single triangle pointing up out of the middle. The one in squirrel's picture almost looks like a three pointed crown kind of thing. Could be just the angle of the photo and what not...but are there different types of power pack heads? Mine are the 60cc variety.

     

    Attached Files:

  9. oldspert
    Joined: Sep 10, 2006
    Posts: 1,263

    oldspert
    Member
    from Texas

    From the non sharp point on the casting, I would say these are 265 PP heads with the small chambers. 57 PP heads had a distinctively sharp point.
     
  10. myke
    Joined: Dec 13, 2004
    Posts: 2,134

    myke
    Member
    from SoCal

    Amazing...I know this picture...They are noted as 1956 heads, that would make them 265's
     
  11. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 24,593

    Roothawg
    Member

    Maybe I am wrong, but I thought the powerpack heads were designed for all around driving. i.e gas mileage etc. Not really performance.
     
  12. oldspert
    Joined: Sep 10, 2006
    Posts: 1,263

    oldspert
    Member
    from Texas

    The power pak option was for more performance. Included the heads, four barrel carb and dual exhaust. External id's was the gold colored V on the trunk lid and the dual pipes.
     
  13. myke
    Joined: Dec 13, 2004
    Posts: 2,134

    myke
    Member
    from SoCal

    Is there also another head that was used these years on a corvette motor?
     
  14. arkiehotrods
    Joined: Mar 9, 2006
    Posts: 6,802

    arkiehotrods
    Member

    I ran a stock 265 with three speed on the column in my Nomad for many years. Plenty of power, with stock 3.70 rear end, to move that wagon down the road. Got decent mileage too, and I loved the sound of it.
     
  15. RocketMan
    Joined: Jun 1, 2006
    Posts: 40

    RocketMan
    Member

    One of the previous messages mentioned a groved rear cam journal.
    As I remember from my machine shop days in early '60's,it seems like the stock "55 V8 cams (and also the '56 ?) came with a flat
    machined on the rear journal to deliver oil pressure from the rear main oil hole to a matching hole in the top of the rear cam bearing
    with every turn of the cam.
    Seems like if a later cam was used(they fit and work fine)you had
    to grind a oil carrier notch in the rear cam journal or the lifter oil
    galleries would not receive any oil.
    Maybe some other dinosaur can rember this better than me and
    comment on this potential oil starvation problem if a later cam is
    to be used.
     
  16. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 24,593

    Roothawg
    Member

    Rocketman is correct.
     
  17. RocketMan
    Joined: Jun 1, 2006
    Posts: 40

    RocketMan
    Member

    I used a set of heads on a .040 over '55 265 that I believe were
    '57 F.I. heads.These heads have the "knob like" filled areas,on each
    side if the spark plugs,which raise the compresson.
    The combustion chamber looks the same as the '56 powerpack heads.The ports are also larger than the '56 powerpack's.
    The "powerpack" heads were identifiable by a pyramid shape sitting
    on top of a rectangle on the front and back of each head,at the same
    location you find the "camel humps" on later heads.
    The '57 F.I. heads had a pair of parallel vertical bars instead of the
    pyramid shape,sitting on top of the rectangle shape.
    Also...'55 blocks are useful to people other than restorers.
    I had this one in a C/A Anglia! They have no cast in il filter receiver
    and are therefore a little bit lighter.
     
  18. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,593

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    Right. There was also a pair of heads in that vintage with a single vertical "tower" extending up from the rectangle--they may have been the 270hp dual quad heads. My older brother's stock car buddies used to scour the junkyards for them in the late '60s. As to the question about the different sizes of triangles on 283 heads, I think that's just a matter of what foundry cast them. I've got at least three different size triangles on various years of power pack heads, but they're all the same valve and combustion chamber size.
     
  19. myke
    Joined: Dec 13, 2004
    Posts: 2,134

    myke
    Member
    from SoCal

    This thread has been a ton of information for me..thanks!
     
  20. CLSSY56
    Joined: Dec 19, 2002
    Posts: 1,218

    CLSSY56
    Member

    The last time I inquired about '56 power pack heads. No one could give me exact proof of what they were or looked like. I don't think the Triangle came out till 57 as 56 was the first year. Also some numbers didn't jive. '57 PP heads were alot better from what I understand.
     
  21. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,593

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    '56 power pack heads were the first to have the triangle symbol on the end of the head, casting number 3725306. The intake ports were enlarged in '57 on all small block heads, even the 2bbl.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.