Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods What is this race car?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by panhead_pete, Dec 19, 2022.

  1. Stogy
    Joined: Feb 10, 2007
    Posts: 26,348

    Stogy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It's f'n awesome...I'd drive it right Anthony!...me first...;)

    My first thoughts were sloper...a style that Ford should have made here and others did make styles inspired that way...timeless and then there's the Utes...
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2022
    panhead_pete likes this.
  2. panhead_pete
    Joined: Feb 22, 2006
    Posts: 3,487

    panhead_pete
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    @Rikster any ideas how this might have been put together?
     
  3. With a lot of welding.
     
  4. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,207

    clem
    Member

    To me it looks like a ‘33 Ford 5 window coupe ( or possibly ‘34 ), - look at swage lines - with a later model - 1937 ish - sloper roof fitted……
    Possibly rolled in one race and hacked a roof off something handy in the wrecking yard for the next race ?
    Unsure if side panels to hood has hand made louvres or poor image makes them look wider/different ?

    21F36057-D995-4CB0-AF36-EF173EF8D37E.jpeg 6523885A-7495-4EB8-A873-E6353F4983DB.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2022
    40two, millersgarage, Hnstray and 4 others like this.
  5. Late 30s Ford chopped and roof laid down a bunch grafted to 34ish ford pieces turned upside down, backwards and rotated 180*
    2F6B60BB-97F7-4D23-9880-025321B721AF.jpeg
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Dec 22, 2022
    Adriatic Machine and Rand Man like this.
  6. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,259

    theHIGHLANDER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The 2nd pic if you expand it, can see the nasty welding at the A pillar so I tend to be in the 33-4 coupe with a later tudor roof added. Clearly by the ¼ panel reveals, firewall and cowl area, flatty motor, suicide doors no other explanation. Probably an early "modified" racer where body rules were quite liberal.
     
    427 sleeper likes this.
  7. hotrodjack33
    Joined: Aug 19, 2019
    Posts: 4,151

    hotrodjack33
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I totally agree. I'm no photoshop guy, but if you eliminate the rear roof section, you see a chopped '33-'34 5 window. Speculation on the rear roof section will probably never get resolved:(
    0.65.jpg
     
    34 GAZ, lostmind and 427 sleeper like this.
  8. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 17,432

    Squablow
    Member

    I agree that it appears to be 33/34 Ford 5W coupe based, but I'm pretty impressed someone went through that much effort to make it into a fastback/sloper shape for use as a dirt track racer.

    I wonder if this wasn't a customized car that later became a dirt track car when it wasn't real valuable anymore. It seems like most dirt track guys wouldn't spend that much effort changing the body just to race it into oblivion.

    The hood in the first pic is what gets me. Although with a blurry picture like that, if every third louver had a pinstripe on it or something, it might just look like it has less (and bigger) louvers than a stock Ford hood.

    Very interesting, whatever it is.
     
    hfh and hotrodjack33 like this.
  9. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,207

    clem
    Member

    good point, probably more likely than my comment….

     
  10. On a 39 chassis?
     
    Squablow likes this.
  11. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 17,432

    Squablow
    Member

    That would make sense. Let's say this is on a '39 chassis, and the body started off as a '33 Ford 5W coupe, chopped at some point. If there was a '39 sedan as the donor for the chassis/drivetrain, let's also say that whoever built it whacked a chunk of the '39 roof off and mated it to the coupe body.

    Here's the two pictures I used, and here's what it looks like, very crudely done but the lines all pretty much fell into place. I left the cut lines relatively obvious so you see what was used and where. I think the race car is chopped more than my example, but the case for this being a '33 5W on a '39 chassis with a '39 Tudor roof back half seems pretty solid. Not an Aussie sloper roof, just a regular old standard '39 Tudor roof.

    33+ford+5.jpg
    39tudor.jpg
    33fordsloper.jpg
     
  12. I’d drive that
     
  13. 427 sleeper
    Joined: Mar 8, 2017
    Posts: 2,889

    427 sleeper
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm still trying to figure out what rear fender's he was running in the first pic.
     
  14. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,259

    theHIGHLANDER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm wondering what the big bumper looking gig is in the 2nd pic covering the rear wheel. Early crash bar? Shit like that and the front gives me that early modified thought.
     
    rod1 and Stogy like this.
  15. Holy Crap. Now I want to build one of those!
    [​IMG]

     
    40two, Okie Pete, 34 5W Paul and 12 others like this.
  16. gene-koning
    Joined: Oct 28, 2016
    Posts: 4,078

    gene-koning
    Member

    It really depends on the time frame. In the mid 60s, most dirt track cars around here were pretty sharp looking cars, at least for the first few weeks. The fan's loved those sharp looking cars, keep in mind, they only had to look good from 50' away. Even as beat up as this old race car is, it still looked pretty good.

    If the guy had the coupe race car and the back end of the body got crashed at the end of the year, its entirely possible he put in the effort to adapt what ever sheet metal he had, or could find onto the chassis so the car could run a few more times.

    That last image Squablow posted was a pretty cool looking car and would have been a real fan favorite, especially if it ran well. In the mid 60s, that could have meant drawing sponsorship $$$$.

    At our local track during that time frame, they took pictures of every race winner. All the pictures were all taken from the infield, of the driver side of the car, with the driver in the car, with his helmet off, holding the checkered flag. Any sponsor advertising on the driver's side of the car would have been visible in the pictures they sold at the picture booth. My dad sponsored a car for several years, his ad was only on the drivers door, the guy won a lot, every picture showed my dad's ad. The only place on the track you could see Dad's ad was when the guy was going down the back straight, or in the pictures. Dad got a lot of work off those pictures.

    A lot of crude was still around, but much of it was prettied up. Put lipstick on that pig, we want a picture of it.
     
  17. Add fenders and have a poor man’s Bugatti
     
  18. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 17,432

    Squablow
    Member

    Fenders and I think an extended cowl, but yeah, I could totally see that. I like this idea. Not sure if it'd be cheap enough to do to be considered "poor man's" but cheaper than the Bug for sure.

    2-1654115177309@2x.jpg
     
  19. $1200
    6DF523CB-E58B-45F3-9742-A945D7910F64.jpeg
    here’s a start
     
    mad mikey, Stogy and millersgarage like this.
  20. Damn, that's cool!
     
    mad mikey and Stogy like this.
  21. clem
    Joined: Dec 20, 2006
    Posts: 4,207

    clem
    Member

    I was looking at the sharper angle, - or should that be smaller angle, - of the 1/4 window.
    Did the sloper version not get made in the States and Canada ?
    Saw one here, - ( New Zealand- not Australia ) - about 30 years ago and just loved the look of it.
     
  22. No, it was unique to Australia.
     
    Stogy likes this.
  23. rod1
    Joined: Jan 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,324

    rod1
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    What's our wheelbase now up to?
     
    Stogy likes this.
  24. 62rebel
    Joined: Sep 1, 2008
    Posts: 3,232

    62rebel
    Member

    A sixteenth of a furlong minus a yard.
     
  25. Some fancy fenders and a centre fin down to the rear for some style and high speed stability. Get the wheelbase back to original :D

    1935 Lancia 1.jpeg 1935 Lancia 2.jpeg 1935 Lancia 3.jpeg
     
    Squablow, rod1, Stogy and 1 other person like this.
  26. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,259

    theHIGHLANDER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Not to be too much of a critic, but this would work way better with only the hood extended. Coachbuilders referred to that treatment as a "false hood" because the cowling was under it, thus adding visual length and symmetry to the design. See Packard Individual Custom by Dietrich, Lebaron Chryler Imperial, several euro brands for examples.
     
    Stogy, rod1, X38 and 1 other person like this.
  27. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,259

    theHIGHLANDER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Examples of what I mentioned above...
    20221223_145656.jpg 20221223_145750.jpg
    In this example, even though a side mount is there the difference is still visible and visual, conventional hood vs custom. Even though a 33-4 Ford is a false hood car the aesthetic of less cowl just works.
    20221223_145811.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 23, 2022
    Stogy likes this.
  28. A little less cowl stretch
    A slight body section.
    Move the axle forward a couple inches.
    Lower it a tad
     
    Stogy likes this.
  29. 2-1654115177309@2x.jpg

    Stole the image and screwed with it. :p

    Looks like some 1930's superhero's car. Something involving bats or shadows... or maybe even a private detective with a jet pack or something. Yeah, it's a "_______-mobile" of some sort or has a cool name like "Widow" or some shit. :D
     
    cactus1, Stogy, 34 GAZ and 1 other person like this.
  30. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,259

    theHIGHLANDER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    "Captain Flathead"...:D
     
    Stogy, rod1, ccain and 2 others like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.