Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 1940 FORD HOW LOW CAN IT GO

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by mandriano, Jul 5, 2022.

  1. mandriano
    Joined: Mar 20, 2008
    Posts: 261

    mandriano
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    1940 Ford coupe, uses a CE rear suspension set-up. The leaf spring is just about as flat as it can be. I have a 1" lowering block installed but it still is too high in the back, would like it a little lower, but without the use of a 2" block. Is there any other way to get it down. The proper way would be to have the spring mounts inboard on the side of the frame instead of under the frame, but too late for that. Any idea's would be appreciated tempImage4YFeRv.png
     

    Attached Files:

  2. KevKo
    Joined: Jun 25, 2009
    Posts: 930

    KevKo
    Member
    from Motown

    You can disassemble the springs and de-arch them. Might only have to do the main leaf. Maybe the main leaf can be flipped?
     
  3. How long is the rear shackle? De-arching the springs or flipping them might be possible, but I would consult CE first. Not many other choices without major surgery. That is one nice 40, and I like the stance as is. Why against a 2" block?
     
  4. Looks great as is. With road trip luggage you will want that inch
     

  5. 1.5" blocks. I had a pair made from scrap chunks of aluminum & a bandsaw.
    Drill & tap a hole in the middle of each one. Thread a bolt in the hole with the head exposed to act as the locating pin for the leaf spring pad. Done. :)
     
  6. flamedabone
    Joined: Aug 3, 2001
    Posts: 5,450

    flamedabone
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That little car is pretty damn close to perfect as she sits, maybe toss two 50 pound sandbags in the trunk and let her fly.

    -Abone.
     
  7. mandriano
    Joined: Mar 20, 2008
    Posts: 261

    mandriano
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm skeptical about 2" blocks because of the pinion angle. But I like the 2 50Llb bag idea
     
  8. twenty8
    Joined: Apr 8, 2021
    Posts: 2,345

    twenty8
    Member

    Make some 2" tapered blocks that will correct the pinion angle shift. Not that hard to do.
    I think you can buy them with the angle too.(2 degrees ???)
     
    chryslerfan55, Just Gary and 40FORDPU like this.
  9. zibo
    Joined: Mar 17, 2002
    Posts: 2,361

    zibo
    Member
    from dago ca

    How long has the kit been installed?
    Usually springs settle an inch or so after some driving.
    I’m with ^ in it looks great from here!!

    I just helped a friend install the same kit on his project 40.
    It had an interesting aftermarket split kit installed way high and off center.
    At first I was hesitant as I like the ford transverse spring,
    however this came out better and easier than expected.
    Bias plies are getting installed today…

    **tip - order the $210 bracket kit from summit, and the $300 springs from speedway, it’s the cheapest way to go!
    TP
     

    Attached Files:

  10. I can see where you're coming from. That rear is WAY TOO high. Somebody out there makes 2" wedge blocks. Check with the off road crowd.
     
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  11. I've seen my own cars drop a little lower when adding the teflon liner between the leafs, easier for the leafs to stretch out without friction binding on the other leafs.
     
    jimmy six likes this.
  12. 34 5W Paul
    Joined: Mar 27, 2020
    Posts: 314

    34 5W Paul
    Member
    from Fresno CA

    If that beauty were mine I'd flip the main leaf in each spring pack to get a no charge de arched/reversed eye. All it will cost you is a bit of time. Good luck, great looking FortyFord.
     
    guthriesmith, Jibs and chryslerfan55 like this.
  13. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 9,445

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    I've got the CE rear spring setup on the rear of my 40 coupe with a Maverick rear end using stock spring pads with 2 inch adjustable lowering blocks and have no problems with pinion angle.
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  14. mandriano
    Joined: Mar 20, 2008
    Posts: 261

    mandriano
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Zibo, That suspension was installed in the early 90's
     
  15. 2935ford
    Joined: Jan 6, 2006
    Posts: 3,843

    2935ford
    Member

    I second that.....looks great as is!
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  16. okiedokie
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 4,783

    okiedokie
    Member
    from Ok

    What Krylon32 said. I have the same in my 40 coupe. If I remember correctly CE had a heavier spring for sedans. But, no matter, 2” block and off you go.
     
  17. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 6,744

    BamaMav
    Member
    from Berry, AL

    Why? It's perfect as is.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  18. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 23,317

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If that were mine it would have 400,000-miles on it, as it sits.

    You won the stance game. You can stop playing now.
     
    Atwater Mike and lothiandon1940 like this.
  19. twenty8
    Joined: Apr 8, 2021
    Posts: 2,345

    twenty8
    Member

    I wouldn't have thought it was noticeable from the driver's seat, and it looks fine from where I am.
    Nice job...:)
     
    Atwater Mike likes this.
  20. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,046

    Ned Ludd
    Member

    Surely the <1½° change at the pinion will equal the opposite <1½° change at the back of the transmission? Unless you're already running large angles in your U-joints you shouldn't have a problem?

    I can see how lowering slightly at the back could help, but it's really splitting hairs. That car is sitting near enough to perfect of its type as makes no difference.
     
  21. geoford41
    Joined: Jul 26, 2011
    Posts: 762

    geoford41
    Member
    from Delaware

    I have the same combination of CE springs on a 8" Granada rear 235 -15 tires on 6" wide Torque thrust D's originally with a 2" block (in my avatar & other Attached photo with hood off) I changed it to a 1" alum block as it was extremally difficult to remove the rear ire and wheel combo and I was worried if I had a flat on the road I would not to easily remove the flat rear tire/wheel. I still have to remove the rear fender brace to get the wheel off but the 1" difference makes it a little easier. Pictures of B4 no hood profile and after on lift with close up of rear wheel.
    FYI I called CE about the rear springs as mine are almost 12 years old and they informed me the springs will eventually take a slight downward set meaning the center area where the spring pads are will be even or even up a little compared to the front and rear ends of the spring pack. sort of a "flat upside down "U" side full view no hood.jpg
     
    Davesblue50 and Papas32 like this.
  22. geoford41
    Joined: Jul 26, 2011
    Posts: 762

    geoford41
    Member
    from Delaware

    Missing Photos from post #21 both photos with 1" rear blocks installed
    ATTACH=full]5446478[/ATTACH] IMG_0252 (1).jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  23. bangngears
    Joined: Aug 30, 2007
    Posts: 1,157

    bangngears
    Member
    from ofallon mo

    I always weld in a bung into the rear frame and have the shackles on each side of the frame. Free 2" of lowering
     
    RollinRock and Nailhead Jason like this.
  24. Whoamel
    Joined: Jul 22, 2007
    Posts: 104

    Whoamel
    Member
    from So Cal

    I think yours looks pretty nice where it's at, myself.

    I had a 50's Lincoln rear axle in mine when I bought it. I replaced it with a 8.8 out of a Ranger and it dropped it about 3/4". I now have about the same amount between the wheel well and the tires as @ geoford41 above.

    Don't have a good shot of it as of now, but here's a before.
    40ford.jpeg
    I like how it looks now, but I understand about wanting to go a bit lower. I always feel like that :)
     
  25. geoford41
    Joined: Jul 26, 2011
    Posts: 762

    geoford41
    Member
    from Delaware

    Whoamel, Nice '40 I wish my hood fit as close as yours, your hood is perfectly aligned! nice job!
    BTW my tires are 235-75 X 15 I missed putting the profile in my post #22
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  26. flat 39
    Joined: Dec 31, 2007
    Posts: 267

    flat 39
    Member

    I think they look good when the tire matches the wheel well opening.
     
  27. buzz4041
    Joined: Nov 14, 2008
    Posts: 361

    buzz4041
    Member
    from Texas

  28. Whoamel
    Joined: Jul 22, 2007
    Posts: 104

    Whoamel
    Member
    from So Cal

    Here is a side shot. 1.5" blocks with a 235/70/15 tire. The front is where I can get over most driveways/speed bumps without scraping, and the rear height gives a slight rake to it.

    I'm always for just little lower, but if the ride quality got worse because of it, I don't think I would be happy with it.

    40stnc.JPG
     
    i.rant, Davesblue50 and okiedokie like this.
  29. mandriano
    Joined: Mar 20, 2008
    Posts: 261

    mandriano
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    So I took some suggestions from the group and put the 2" lowering blocks in. I think it look's better. tempImageFMwneq.png tempImagevYrr4K.png
     
  30. A Boner
    Joined: Dec 25, 2004
    Posts: 7,437

    A Boner
    Member

    I like the “rake” look better…guess you don’t!
     
    zibo likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.