Register now to get rid of these ads!

History What stock class would a 271 hp 64 Fairlane be in 1964?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by oldiron 440, Mar 16, 2022.

  1. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,332

    oldiron 440
    Member

    So here it is, I've been watching the Jr. Stock thread and got to wondering what class a 271 horse 289 Fairlane would fit in in 1964 or 65. Would any of you know what it would be or how to find out? I found a picture one online a few years back but so far I'm not having any luck.
     
  2. SR100
    Joined: Nov 26, 2013
    Posts: 1,131

    SR100
    Member

    How much does it weigh? Here's the class breakdown from the 1964 NHRA rulebook:
    upload_2022-3-16_3-19-1.png
     
    Joe Travers, oldiron 440 and loudbang like this.
  3. Boss 302 Mustang
    Joined: Feb 21, 2010
    Posts: 66

    Boss 302 Mustang
    Member
    from Duxbury MA

    For some reason, I vaguely remember an automatic being classified as D/SA, though I might be wrong.
     
    loudbang, lothiandon1940 and Andamo like this.
  4. catdad49
    Joined: Sep 25, 2005
    Posts: 6,422

    catdad49
    Member

    With a shipping weight of 2913 and 271 horsepower, it would be in C/S. I searched and found different weights depending on the source. Shipping weight is different than curb weight, the closer to shipping wt. the better.
     
    loudbang, jnaki and lothiandon1940 like this.

  5. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 14,932

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Scales at the track were used if you won.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  6. RmK57
    Joined: Dec 31, 2008
    Posts: 2,694

    RmK57
    Member

    I would have thought they would be way down the list like K/L/M stock.

    C/S would be 1969 396 Nova, 1969 Cobra-Jet Mustang, 1969 440 Roadrunner territory.
     
    Desoto291Hemi likes this.
  7. None of the serious stock class racers ran those.... LOL.

    It was all about 'advertised' HP. The way the rules were set up, a racer could get pretty much the same power out of a 'ordinary' 289-4V and had 50 less advertised HP. That would drop you down two classes and give a slower ET to run against. Go into Super Stock and any HP differences disappeared and you still had the advantage of the lower rating.
     
    Mark Yac and loudbang like this.
  8. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,332

    oldiron 440
    Member

    Thank you, its 2950 lbs without driver
     
    loudbang likes this.
  9. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,332

    oldiron 440
    Member

    Did NHRA handy cap the class like they do now?
     
    loudbang likes this.
  10. Joe Travers
    Joined: Mar 21, 2021
    Posts: 708

    Joe Travers
    Member
    from Louisiana

    Advertised horsepower for those cars was very underrated & they were heavier than the early Fairlane. The games had begun before then. Hi-Po 289 rating was fairly accurate.

    Joe
     
    loudbang likes this.
  11. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    Like many other performance cars then, the 289/271 was not all that fast as it came off showroom floor….
     
  12. RmK57
    Joined: Dec 31, 2008
    Posts: 2,694

    RmK57
    Member

    My mistake. I was thinking of today what class they would run in. Nhra rates them at 271 hp and 281 with legal after market aluminum heads. Weight is at 3024 in a 62A body. It would not be very competitive today.

    As was mentioned you would be much better off with a regular 289 4-bbl. rated at 205 hp.
     
  13. Marty Strode
    Joined: Apr 28, 2011
    Posts: 8,912

    Marty Strode
    Member

    Here are the documents, (books) that I used to figure classes for guys back then. The NADA, had the shipping weights and advertised HP, and the NHRA Rule Book broke down the classes, by weight to HP. With a 2 dr HT, 11.04 puts it near the middle of C Stock. IMG_8626.JPG IMG_8625.JPG IMG_8624.JPG
     
    AHotRod, 41 GMC K-18, jnaki and 4 others like this.
  14. oldolds
    Joined: Oct 18, 2010
    Posts: 3,408

    oldolds
    Member

    The classes changed every year. My fathers car dropped a class almost ever year He ran a Hudson Jet. Low class car. He was u/s or v/s by 1970. Those classes are not even there in 64
     
    loudbang and RmK57 like this.
  15. I was gonna guess around J stock,,,,,I guess I was wrong,,,,lol .

    Tommy
     
    onetrickpony and loudbang like this.
  16. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,289

    finn
    Member

    The 4 barrel 289 was rated at 210 and 225 Kip, depending on compression ratio.
    64 1/2 Mustang had lower CR, and a 210 rating .

    Higher CR cars, including the 65s were 225.

    Solid lifter 289s were 271, except the GT350, which was 306.
     
    tommyd and loudbang like this.
  17. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,984

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The science of stock class racing. Also and ego buster when you show up at the strip with your strong running but stone stock street car with street tires and win a couple of rounds and then pull up to the line and the car in the other lane is all lettered up, has a batch of national event stickers on it and the back window of that 62 Chevy 409 4 speed wagon has a line of national record holder stickers, Your 14.25 doesn't look very good against his running right on the record 12.69. That was me in G stock at Little River in 1969. That was 310 hp and 2495 lbs. 5 pounds under the price bump for the Texas license plate fees.
     
    chevy57dude likes this.
  18. jnaki
    Joined: Jan 1, 2015
    Posts: 9,397

    jnaki










    Hey M,

    Great information on the Ford powered stock class cars. Here are the results of the class records set for January 1964.
    upload_2022-3-16_17-1-44.png
    With 271 horsepower, the Fairlane was no sleeper, but the national record for the C/Stock was fast for the time. 14.13 and 101 mph were the Super Stock class speeds and times from the 1959 and 1960 stock classes. For everyone else, in 1964, the classes were moving fast and within several years, were gone. So, there was a lot of set ups and tuning done during this time period for the cars that were competing. The consistent class winners and record setters were seasoned veterans of the stock class battles.

    Jnaki
    upload_2022-3-16_17-9-1.png

    By the end of the year in December 1964, the record list was faster in all classes and record setting driver/owners. The only repeat person was Jere Stahl in G/Stock.

    The drag racing 1971 season was ending and the 72 season was just a thought, this was a December 1971 ad.
    upload_2022-3-16_17-21-0.png
    The classes were decimated and the top winners were the competitors until they, too, weren't in the picture, the following years.

    So, there is no comparison to any stock class in the later versions when they were still around past 1966.
    upload_2022-3-16_17-26-37.png
    Gone are the stock factory cars, replaced by allowable modified cars, running as stock car classes. To keep the limited classes in place, the description sounds like the old Gas Coupe and Sedan Class rules, with the allowed modifications. The term stock should be changed to factory modified stock bodied class cars. Since 1965 is the HAMB cut off date, rules or action beyond can't compare to the 64 rules.
     
    AHotRod and 41 GMC K-18 like this.
  19. Kentuckian
    Joined: Nov 26, 2008
    Posts: 863

    Kentuckian
    Member

    In 1964 the 289/271 '64 Fairlane 2dr sedan fell in the bottom of C/S while the 2dr hardtop was in the top of D/S.
    There was only the 271 solid lifter 289 4-barrel or 195 horse 289 2-barrel. Unlike the '64 Comet or Mustang, the Fairlane did not get a 289 4-barrel with hydraulic lifters until 1965.
     
    Charlie K, loudbang and Mark Yac like this.
  20. tommyd
    Joined: Dec 10, 2010
    Posts: 11,960

    tommyd
    Member
    from South Indy

     
  21. tommyd
    Joined: Dec 10, 2010
    Posts: 11,960

    tommyd
    Member
    from South Indy

    The 210 hp was a four barrel single exhaust 64 1/2.
     
  22. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,289

    finn
    Member

    The 64 1/2 D code 210 hp 298 did indeed have a single exhaust. So did the 65 225 hp 289, unless the GT package was also ordered.

    (My own 65 289/225 Mustang came from the factory with single exhaust, side scoop delete, three speed transmission, whitewall tires, and an am radio. Nothing else. We bought it in 1967, when I was 16, for $1065, from the Credit Union, who repossessed it from the original owner.... thanks, Dad!).

    The 64 210 Mustang 4 bbl was 9.0 CR, and had a five bolt block. It was also available on the Cyclone. CR was bumped to 10:1 for the 65 model year, and power rating to 225. The switch to the six bolt block also came in for 65. A friend put an original 1964 210 hp low compression engine and four speed in his mom’s old four door 60 Falcon in about 1965. Quite the sleeper in its day.

    The hipo 271 hp was 10.5:1, except some references suggest 11:1 for the original small valve 63 Fairlane 271 hp version.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.