Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Thoughts on lowering the front of my 59.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Fabulous50's, Nov 9, 2021.

?
  1. Leave it alone

    11.4%
  2. Lower just the front

    40.9%
  3. Lower front and back

    45.5%
  4. Jack it up...

    2.3%
  1. Fabulous50's
    Joined: Nov 18, 2017
    Posts: 513

    Fabulous50's
    Member
    from Maine

    I've been looking for some polished stainless skirts for a few years. I'd like to lower the front by 2-3 inches.

    I'm thinking just bandsaw the front coils and leave the rear leafs as they are....

    Or am I ruining my own ride?
     

    Attached Files:

    Jeff Norwell, catdad49 and Just Gary like this.
  2. Firecat7
    Joined: Dec 11, 2011
    Posts: 269

    Firecat7
    Member

    As you must know, cutting will tend to stiffen. But ,that being said, these are kind of a float boat. Probably could use some stiffening. dont take 3 " out. maybe a coil. then try it.
     
  3. rockable
    Joined: Dec 21, 2009
    Posts: 4,449

    rockable
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Check with Fatman. They may have dropped spindles for the stock suspension. That is the best way to go.
     
  4. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 33,946

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Damn, Ryan doesn't charge extra to hit the FULL IMAGE button so us old farts can see the photo without a magnifying glass.

    In other news It just flat would look better to me if you brought the front down so sat level. The tail dragger look is great on round body cars but I'm not a fan on square body cars. fiddy nine ferd.jpg
     

  5. buick bill
    Joined: Dec 18, 2008
    Posts: 861

    buick bill
    Member
    from yreka;ca

    i say make it a hopper ! ok , just drop it a few !
     
    Fabulous50's likes this.
  6. Fabulous50's
    Joined: Nov 18, 2017
    Posts: 513

    Fabulous50's
    Member
    from Maine

    This.

    I'm really thinking I'll just cut the springs. I would have done it when I rebuilt the front, but I hadn't ever driven it then.

    It rides so soft, a couple of inches wouldnt even make a difference. I'll have to realign it though.
     
    arkiehotrods likes this.
  7. vtx1800
    Joined: Oct 4, 2009
    Posts: 1,715

    vtx1800
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    On my Studebaker I cut about 1 1/2 coils off and it lowered it about two inches.....granted, that's not a Ford or a Ford Spring. Your results may vary:)
     
    arkiehotrods and Fabulous50's like this.
  8. I just did my sons 59 Edsel and just swapped in Moog CC851 springs. It went down right at 2” and the springs are actually progressive so the first bit is soft, but then they stiffen up as they compress. I found the application to be for the rear of a 90ish Thunderbird and the spring rate is basically the same as the original 59 springs. They are just shorter. Here is a pic of stock springs, Aerostar springs (shortest) which I hear lower these too much and the ones I used (mid-length in pic). Also attached a pic of how the Edsel sits now for reference. Your Ford should be basically the same. The rear has 2” blocks on this car, but it is actually slightly nose down with the 2” drop in front. I measured a 1/2” difference in the height of the bottom of the front fender vs. the rocker right in front of the rear wheel for reference (so around 1/2” lower in the front).

    DBA4813E-F7ED-4051-8288-923039C978CC.jpeg 1B0B3EA0-8BA8-491F-95B9-2B6F7169C307.jpeg
     
  9. xhotrodder
    Joined: Jul 2, 2009
    Posts: 1,665

    xhotrodder
    Member

    Eaton Spring Co. or Posie's might have lowering front springs for it.
     
  10. Cut a coil and a half in the front and a 2" block in the rear of my 57..
    20200728_180928_HDR.jpg
     
  11. I took 1 coil from my OG springs, I could have gone another 1/2. I calculated the new spring rate as 495 lbs/inch. The OG springs were around 415 and it does ride nice. I have a fat sway bar up front that really helped the ride.
    629-021.JPG
     
  12. Jeff Norwell
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 14,842

    Jeff Norwell
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    As mentioned,. Eaton Spring does indeed have the proper coils for your car.... 2 inch low,1 inch low-stock-1 inch high-2 inch high.
    I believe to buy the coils and new rubber pieces(insulators) is about $250-$300.
    I would definitely be in that direction.
    Nice car.
     
  13. Jeff Norwell
    Joined: Aug 20, 2003
    Posts: 14,842

    Jeff Norwell
    MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    As well, as @bobss396 mentioned..... if your budget allows.. I highly recommend as well the aftermarket sway bar.... One company I believe is ADDCO(sp?)......The improvement over stock is truly amazing.I bought mine through Larry's T-Bird and it was a big eye opener.
    And the prices I quoted were a rough Idea...I was looking at the 57-58 coils.... so there may be a difference......I was looking at the Eaton website.
    Sorry for the long winded after thoughts.....
     
    Fabulous50's likes this.
  14. Fabulous50's
    Joined: Nov 18, 2017
    Posts: 513

    Fabulous50's
    Member
    from Maine

    This is one of the things which I like so much about this place! Real world stuff!

    I'm going to look into the Moog CC851 at the local auto parts store.
     
  15. If they don't carry that brand, they can be looked up by application which appears to be 89-91 Thunderbird or Cougar rear. I wasn't the one that found these, that was someone else in the 52-59 Ford social group. But, they seemed to work well. Good luck.
     
  16. Fabulous50's
    Joined: Nov 18, 2017
    Posts: 513

    Fabulous50's
    Member
    from Maine

    20220227_204913.jpg

    Finally getting the time to do this. I'm going to cut 1.5" off which puts it at about a coil and a half.

    I figure if I don't like the ride or I screw something up I'll just buy the Moog springs locally.

    Also got the Addco sway bar which should be a huge improvement over the pathetically small stock 5/8" bar. 20220207_100250.jpg
     
  17. Cool! Looking forward to how it looks when you get it back on the ground. :cool:
     
    Jeff Norwell and Fabulous50's like this.
  18. UNSHINED 2
    Joined: Oct 30, 2006
    Posts: 1,165

    UNSHINED 2
    Member

    Screenshot_20220227-201031_Chrome.jpg I used the Moog springs on my '59 w/ 2 1/2" blocks in the rear. It would be lower, but I went to 15" wheels and tires that are about an inch taller than 14's. It did work out very well. The car handles very well, takes the windy country roads very well...... Better than it should, Ha! Like was said before, they are a progressive spring, you can actually feel it in the corner.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2022
    Fabulous50's likes this.
  19. cabong
    Joined: Nov 29, 2005
    Posts: 886

    cabong
    Member

    I'm git'n old, so I don't remember the correct year, but I used Ford Windstar front springs on my '58 Fairlane 2-dr Hdtp. It brought the front down by a couple inches, and maintained the proper ride. They also maintain the variable rate which makes the handling nice.
     
    Fabulous50's likes this.
  20. Fabulous50's
    Joined: Nov 18, 2017
    Posts: 513

    Fabulous50's
    Member
    from Maine

    Mmmmm, I'd love to slam it for sure! Out roads here in the arctic zone of the US wouldn't be kind. I've got some frame rash on it now, but man I want it lower.
     
    Jeff Norwell likes this.
  21. manyolcars
    Joined: Mar 30, 2001
    Posts: 9,189

    manyolcars

    I've been driving my 59 for 22 years. I have VW tires on the front and I dont want the car to sit any lower
     
    Jeff Norwell and Fabulous50's like this.
  22. Fabulous50's
    Joined: Nov 18, 2017
    Posts: 513

    Fabulous50's
    Member
    from Maine

    Apparently MOOG is no longer making the CC851 springs. Everywhere I've checked lists them but they are NLA. I went to Eaton Detroit but the spring pair is very pricey, considering that if the CC851s were available they are $70 a pair locally. Napa and Advance Auto both said they aren't available any longer.

    I'm trying to figure out what the specs are for the origional spring so I can look up what would work. I'm still toying with the idea of cutting my origionals, but the progressive aftermarket springs seem like the way to go for lowering this boat.
     
    Jeff Norwell likes this.
  23. Did you just look up the CC851 by application? I think I remember them being a rear spring for a early 90’s Thunderbird.
     
    Jeff Norwell likes this.
  24. Fabulous50's
    Joined: Nov 18, 2017
    Posts: 513

    Fabulous50's
    Member
    from Maine

    Yes 89-91 T-bird rear. Not available, but the front springs are...

    Update, I was able to order them directly from Moog on their website. PayPal and free shipping. I'm going to save my uncut origionals in case....well I have no idea.
     
  25. Fabulous50's
    Joined: Nov 18, 2017
    Posts: 513

    Fabulous50's
    Member
    from Maine

    Another update....I was just refunded the Moog CC851 spring. Apparently they are not made anymore. None of the auto parts stores have any in any of their warehouses either.

    I just went through the 13 page thread about the Areostar CC850 springs.

    I know @bobss396 said the CC850 made his 59 too low. What are you running for an engine? I have a 352.

    It looks like the older Fords do very well with the Areostar CC850 but the 59s may be too heavy, and I think the front suspension was redesigned in 59 which would have different geometry.

    I'm really considering getting the CC850 and possibly adding lift blocks if it is too low.....

    I really have no idea now. Just want to put my front back together.
     
    Jeff Norwell likes this.
  26. I wouldn’t be afraid to run the CC850’s with some thicker rubber isolators. I actually still have a 1” thick set I believe that I never took back to the store. They should raise it about 2” so you have some room to deal with being too low. My sons 59 Edsel never bottoms out at all even with no bumpers in it right now with the 851’s. Not terrible to try it once the ball joints are broke loose that first time.
     
  27. Fabulous50's
    Joined: Nov 18, 2017
    Posts: 513

    Fabulous50's
    Member
    from Maine

    It looks like either the CC850 Aerostar springs and the Eaton Detroit lowering springs are my only options.
     
  28. Greg Rogers
    Joined: Oct 11, 2016
    Posts: 809

    Greg Rogers
    Member

    Did you try Rock Auto for those rear T bird springs? It seems like they have a bunch of odd ball stuff maybe they get from warehouses closing up, etc..... might be worth a try.
     
    Fabulous50's likes this.
  29. hepme
    Joined: Feb 1, 2021
    Posts: 523

    hepme
    Member

    careful on the cut. Them babies ain't lightweight and after the cut it will settle a little. Ex: at 3200 lbs, i cut one coil (and a fraction) -2" down after the settle. Initially i was going to do 1 1/2 coils. My bud did that on his, same car, and he can snowplow with his bumper.
     
    Fabulous50's likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.