Register now to get rid of these ads!

Customs Putting a 302 in a 1939 Ford 1/2 ton

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Dan Richey, Sep 20, 2021.

  1. Dan Richey
    Joined: Sep 20, 2021
    Posts: 6

    Dan Richey

    Looking for help and guidance on putting a Ford 302 in a 1939 Ford 1/2 ton. I've seen it done, but now that I'm ready to do it, I need more details...
     
  2. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,320

    oldiron 440
    Member

    I know the oil pan can be an issue. Pickup, Bronko and car pans give a good variety of sump locations. Water pump length can be a problem also, Edelbrock has a length list online just look under there pumps.
     
  3. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 12,363

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That's weird, I could have sworn I already responded to this...oh crap! Newbie!
     
    warhorseracing likes this.
  4. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,320

    oldiron 440
    Member

    I had that happen last weekend but I think I didn't hit the blue button....
     
    warhorseracing and Bandit Billy like this.

  5. The version of the 302 (year made) and transmission used will make a lot of difference on how you approach the swap. The motor had some changes over years it was made.
    Probably the best and easiest version for your swap would be the 1968-82 motor with a C4 automatic.
    There are a couple of things to consider with this swap- this motor has the "lead" cylinder on the passenger side, necessitating having it shifted forward more for the driver's side cylinder head to clear accelerator linkage. Using a rear sump oil pan will need to have the dipstick in the pan.
    Motor and transmission mount fabrication is straight forward, and there are a couple of motor mount designs (horizontal bolt or vertical stud) to choose from.
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2021
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  6. NashRodMan
    Joined: Jul 8, 2004
    Posts: 1,989

    NashRodMan
    Member

    Welcome to the HAMB Dan. Good luck with the truck. Post some pics for us.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  7. The normal rear sump pan is for a fox body mustang. The shortest front drive is from a 96-2000 explorer. There is a snow white water pump conversion also. You will need to decide on standard or reverse rotation water pump. There are different outlet locations for both as well as a couple of different lengths. I'm guessing you are using a straight front axle. Headers get interesting. I have used block huggers on a couple of builds. If the oil filter is a problem, there are 2 shorter filters available before considering a right angle or remote mount. If you are using an 83 or newer engine, they will be 50oz. balance.
     
  8. 6sally6
    Joined: Feb 16, 2014
    Posts: 2,467

    6sally6
    Member

    I would do-myself-a-favor and go with an 85 or later 5.0(302-5.0 sameo-sameo) for the simple reason they use a roller cam. More expensive but a roller doesn't have the flattened lobes issue. Like above...most are 50 oz balancer. (IF you have the rotating assembly balanced it can be a non-issue)
    6sally6
     
  9. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,075

    Beanscoot
    Member

    To add to what 6Sally6 said, the best 302 made was put in the late Exploders. Roller camshaft, GT40 cast iron heads.

    You can just remove all the newer FI junk and put on a carb and intake and early distributor (with steel gear), and front cover & dress.
     
  10. I recently upgraded my 40 Ford pickup from a sbc to a Ford 302. It's a roller engine out of a 95 tbird and uses the old firing order.
    Made my own engine mounts that bolt on to the front of heads. Used the fan blade off of the sbc.
    50oz flywheel, used a Professional Products 50oz balancer that is drilled for both 3 bolt and 4 bolt crankshaft pulleys.
    I didn't want to change the Walker radiator so I used a 1969 water pump so it would be on the right hand side to fit the sbc radiator. Used spectre 2 groove pulleys for the crankshaft and water pump. Run a electric fuel pump. Used a 6 qt rear sump 90's ford van oil pan. Found a set of rear exit headers and swapped them from left to right and have no starter clearance problems and the left side is no where close to the steering box. The sbc header set right on top of the steering box. I did a write up on the installation in the #48 issue of Rodding USA. [​IMG] [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Keith Daleen
     
    GTHOtrod, RodStRace, hotrodA and 14 others like this.
  11. MeanGene427
    Joined: Dec 15, 2010
    Posts: 2,307

    MeanGene427
    Member
    from Napa

    I have one of those, a '97, sweet setup. VERY compact to make it fit in there, front drive setup short, headers, and runs excellent. Nice driveline too. I keep waiting for it to go south somehow so I can mine the driveline but it's a great daily, excellent AC, leather- just keeps chuggin'
     
  12. @southpaw-customs , Thanks for the pictures, and details on your swap. Very useful information.
     
  13. 40Standard
    Joined: Jul 30, 2005
    Posts: 5,963

    40Standard
    Member
    from Indy

    got to say it......a SBC drops right in
     
  14. So does a smallblock Ford........

    Hi-Po in a '40.jpg
     
  15. MeanGene427
    Joined: Dec 15, 2010
    Posts: 2,307

    MeanGene427
    Member
    from Napa

    Got to say it- another Chebbrainwashed, with the usual put a Chebbie in it BS. Nobody asked for that "wisdom" Chebbie man.jpg
     
  16. manyolcars
    Joined: Mar 30, 2001
    Posts: 9,188

    manyolcars

    The SBC is the traditional hotrod solution for the flathead problems
     
    26 T Ford RPU likes this.
  17. MeanGene427
    Joined: Dec 15, 2010
    Posts: 2,307

    MeanGene427
    Member
    from Napa

    The SBC is the traditional cheap solution for folks who don't know how to work on or can't afford anything else. Guys who wanted to go FAST and had a little more money had big Olds, Nailhead, Cadillacs etc. And the OP did NOT ask for "put a Chebbie in it" BS, he had a specific question that did NOT involve Chebbies
     
  18. twenty8
    Joined: Apr 8, 2021
    Posts: 2,345

    twenty8
    Member

    This has the potential to be a very interesting and informative thread, but....reset time. Lets go back to the post above (#12) and try to stay on target. Many use a small block Chev, but a Ford engine in a Ford is a tremendous idea and just seems right. So, tuck in your attitudes and let's get back on track with the OP's question........................GO.............:rolleyes:
     
    RodStRace, Budget36 and sidevalve8ba like this.
  19. If you have any questions I will be more than happy to walk you through everything I did. It wasn't hard.

    Keith
     
    40FORDPU likes this.
  20. MeanGene427
    Joined: Dec 15, 2010
    Posts: 2,307

    MeanGene427
    Member
    from Napa

    BINGO- thank you. "got to say it"- no, you don't, OP did NOT ask for that
     
  21. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,238

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    This Chebbie guy agrees, I find it refreshing to see a Ford in a Ford (OHV).
    And if the OP had the coin for a Boss motor even I would say "now we're talk'n".
     
    mrfliboy, Budget36 and 550Coupe like this.
  22. RmK57
    Joined: Dec 31, 2008
    Posts: 2,686

    RmK57
    Member

    Man that looks slick! Like it was made for it.
     
  23. MeanGene427
    Joined: Dec 15, 2010
    Posts: 2,307

    MeanGene427
    Member
    from Napa

    Yep, with the early 60's trim and colors, looks like it came that way- sweet and not boring lol
     
    RodStRace likes this.
  24. What I really like about that install is not only is it neat as a pin but they did not cut the firewall and it uses a mechanical fan. Doesn't get much better than that in my book.
     
    RodStRace likes this.
  25. Not for the OP but the shivrola lovers.
    1henry.jpg
     
    sidevalve8ba likes this.
  26. 50flathead
    Joined: Mar 8, 2005
    Posts: 1,166

    50flathead
    Member
    from Iowa, USA

    That looks fantastic! Any build pics?
     
  27. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,271

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    Hurst style mount to the head....Mounts like a flathead....on the flathead biscuits.... ^^Post #10
    You can use a early C-4 and it "should" fit or at least fit better than any automatic....The C-4 will fit in a 41- up truck/Open Drive...on the original crossmember.
    You can also use an adapter to adapt the 302 to the original 3 speed. The adapter bells are pricy (less common than SBC) for a SBF. This is a good idea if the original driveline is intact.....It saves a lot of modifications.
     
  28. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,377

    indyjps
    Member

    As referenced above, can you tell what year the 302 is, or what generation. It will narrow down the advice.
     
  29. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,377

    indyjps
    Member

    I'm cracking up MeanGene. I had a tre fiddly wif a 292 cam, better heads though.
     
  30. OP hasn't been back since the day he joined and asked the question.:rolleyes: :mad:
     
    indyjps likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.