Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical 389 with 400 heads?

Discussion in 'Traditional Customs' started by Krunk!!!, Sep 2, 2021.

  1. Krunk!!!
    Joined: Sep 2, 2021
    Posts: 2

    Krunk!!!

    I have a nice 1960 389 Im building to replace the 347 in my 57 pontiac
    I found a Great set of Nos .040 pistons for it....flat tops with the 4 valve reliefs, just like the factory ones
    anyway.........
    Also found a NICE set of 1967 061 heads,they are from a 330 hp 400.....
    Wondering if I can use these heads without having any clearance problems,or should i just use 400 pistons in the block????
     
  2. SS327
    Joined: Sep 11, 2017
    Posts: 2,535

    SS327

    Wasn’t the 60 Pontiac reverse flow cooling also? Will they fit the earlier block? Will the coolant passages line up? I honestly don’t know. I do know the will work on a 65 and up 389.
     
  3. Poncho60
    Joined: Jan 23, 2011
    Posts: 279

    Poncho60
    Member
    from N Illinois

    Reverse flow ended with the 59 model year.
     
    Elcohaulic likes this.
  4. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 23,920

    Deuces

    That's good to know....
     

  5. Black Panther
    Joined: Jan 6, 2010
    Posts: 2,143

    Black Panther
    Member
    from SoCal

    Earlier Pontiac engines also oiled the top end through the rocker stud. I think there are ports on the deck that needs plugging and you can switch to later hollow pushrods. Something to look out for..
     
    Deuces likes this.
  6. wvenfield
    Joined: Nov 23, 2006
    Posts: 5,584

    wvenfield
    Member

    They will fit. Do some research there is a good bit of info on what all you need to do. Nothing too big of a job.
     
    Deuces likes this.
  7. I have absolutely no idea what I am talking about but I seem to recall hearing something about 64 389 heads not working on a later 389 or maybe it's that they would fit if you used the correct year intake manifold. Something like a 64 tri-power intake will only work on later engine if you use the 64 heads. I dunno ... just something ringing a bell but the bell is covered in spider webs, moss, and is very heavily tarnished. Hopefully someone will step in a clarify or dispell :)
     
    Last edited: Sep 3, 2021
    Deuces likes this.
  8. Poncho60
    Joined: Jan 23, 2011
    Posts: 279

    Poncho60
    Member
    from N Illinois

    Check out the Pontiac forums on the Ames Performance website. You can get all the info you need!
     
    irishsteve and wvenfield like this.
  9. lostone
    Joined: Oct 13, 2013
    Posts: 2,876

    lostone
    Member
    from kansas

    Just have to use 65 and newer intake.

    Also note those are closed chambered heads and depending on pistons you could be getting up there around 10:75 compression with those heads and also depending on which head gaskets you use.

    I did build a 389 once using standard bore 400 pistons and 65 up heads. I think, its been a few yrs, that I was ok up to around .500 lift.
     
  10. Joe H
    Joined: Feb 10, 2008
    Posts: 1,550

    Joe H
    Member

  11. stuart in mn
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Posts: 2,414

    stuart in mn
    Member

    The valve reliefs in the pistons were at slightly different angles for the 1967 and newer engines. I don't know if you'll have interference between the valves and pistons, but it's something you'll need to confirm - the pistons for the earlier engines can be modified with new reliefs, or you can use the newer style pistons.
     
  12. 1934coupe
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 5,070

    1934coupe
    Member

    Elcohaulic you are so right about the cam, I have found that my engines and ones I've done for friends are still running and running good with a nice milder cam than a "wild mutha thumper". Most of these street cars run 3.36-3.70 ratios through mufflers in around town traffic and will run all day.

    Pat
     
    Deuces likes this.
  13. Black Panther
    Joined: Jan 6, 2010
    Posts: 2,143

    Black Panther
    Member
    from SoCal

    The 670 head was used on GTO, Firebird and possibly Grand Prix...the 061 head was used on full size applications. There are a few other head numbers too, including 143 and some 326 cu in.. and 2 barrel heads.
     
    Deuces likes this.
  14. 6sally6
    Joined: Feb 16, 2014
    Posts: 2,467

    6sally6
    Member

    IF it don't 'sound-like-a-hot-rod'......they why do it?
    From a kid-in-the-60's.....all the Pontiacs I remember sounded VERY healthy and most were screamerz (the rest.....didn't impress me much so I forget them!)
    Why not tighten that LSA about 6 degrees and gear-it IF you loose too much on the bottom?!!!
    6sally6 17.1.jpg
     
  15. jazz1
    Joined: Apr 30, 2011
    Posts: 1,534

    jazz1
    Member

    I forget most but I do recall the Pontiac 400 6X heads were most desirable to top the 350 or 389 BB's.
     
    Deuces likes this.
  16. 57JoeFoMoPar
    Joined: Sep 14, 2004
    Posts: 6,149

    57JoeFoMoPar
    Member

    Because not all of us on this site are building hot rods. Some of us just want a nice running, reliable engine that isn't a terror to drive, with enough balls to keep it interesting.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.