Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Poly begets a Hemi begets a Model A

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by wstory, May 21, 2020.

  1. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    Didn't really know how to document my minimal progress. Seems I've been doin a lot more headscratchin than fabricatin,....tryin to visualize a path to get what I want.
    Got some "stilts" fabricated which allows me to move the frame about under the body and visualize where and how much to nibble. You see in this pic, the frame is located a good 4+" below the body's sub-rail.
    IMG_3529.JPG
    What this illustrates, right off the bat, is how much of the tank extends beyond the body. Unacceptable in every way! I'd toss in the towel if I couldn't come up with something visually acceptable. Also a given for me is an outside tank with provision for a submerged fuel pump,... like the 32 tank from Tanks.
    IMG_3536.JPG IMG_3540.JPG
    What I have discovered is the rear body mounting bolt location, and the knuckle that I so cleverly crafted, is the first limiter to sliding the tank forward. And ironically, the corresponding detail in the sub-rail is nibbled away in the process of adapting the frame.
    So,....next order of business is removing the offending knuckle which will allow the tank to slide forward a good 2-2.5" before the flange gets close to the coil-over. We'll see how that looks
    thumbnailAC.jpg
    IMG_3546.JPG
     
  2. Not sure how I missed this update but I can clearly see why you want the tank moved forward. I like the stilt idea, much more fabrication but if they were adjustable you could really play around with situating the body to the frame. I guess you can also do that by jacking the frame up too. Either way keep swinging at it Bill, it's looking good!
     
    loudbang likes this.
  3. Just another thought, will the tank look like it's sticking that far out if the body was sitting lower on the frame? Or if the rear frame horns were kicked up a bit to get the tank closer to the body?
     
    loudbang likes this.
  4. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    I think I've got it! As suspected the coil-over is the limiter to moving the tank forward, and I've reached that point even before spending any more time or mental energy building a new crossmember.
    So,...I wacked off the offending knuckle and that got me 3 inches of forward movement of the tank.
    IMG_3552.JPG IMG_3555.JPG IMG_3559.JPG
    Of course I will trim the frame so's the spreader bar is nestled against the tank. Jacking the frame until the tank hits the bottom of the body begins to get "the look". It's very close to duplicating the relationship as on a 32 Sedan. Still have to relieve the body sheet metal by at least 4" in order to raise the frame up to meet the Model A sub-rails.
    IMG_3561.JPG
    Note the proximity of the tank flange to the coil spring, about 1/4". The tank ain't goin any more forward.
    IMG_3564.JPG
     
  5. Rand Man
    Joined: Aug 23, 2004
    Posts: 4,872

    Rand Man
    Member

    I plan on doing a gas tank conversion like that on my Model A. I know they look great on full fendered, but I suspect they will be good for open wheel too. A tank too small is a giant pain.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  6. That looks much better!
     
    loudbang likes this.
  7. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    IMG_3540.JPG
    Well boys, I'm guilty of serious procrastination! Since last posting I've expended an inordinate amount of time thinking. Just couldn't picture how to resolve the tank issue. The above pic illustrates what I was thinking and I have "pulled the trigger", ordered the "below the deck panel" from Brookville and started cutting.
    IMG_3586.JPG IMG_3589.JPG
    Discovered the forward part of the wheel well was about 3/4" narrower than the frame so had to do a little cut and tuck in order for the body to drop over the frame.

    IMG_3591.JPG IMG_3592.JPG
    Now I'm beginning to get the look I'm after. I'll integrate the Brookville part with the original Model A channel that when complete will be located a good 6" higher on the body eliminating more of the Sedan "tuck" and as a result covering more of the tank,...approaching the appearance as on a 32 Roadster/Coupe. Note also how much of the frame that will be wacked off.
    IMG_3593.JPG IMG_3594.JPG 32 Roadster Tank.jpg
     
    oliver westlund, Tim, brEad and 14 others like this.
  8. Thinking time is important Bill, and it shows. Good job.
     
    dirt t likes this.
  9. I like it. Thumbs up.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  10. Looks like the procrastinating and thinking has paid off! Any side profile pics? I'm liking it!
     
    loudbang likes this.
  11. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    IMG_3609.JPG
    Feelin pretty good about how this is going. The loaded diaper look is still there if you're looking for it but from a normal viewing height and the distraction of the tire, a taillight and bobbed frame, no one will notice.
    I've found that the sub rails are more complex and rusty than I thought. I probably said, too often, that plopping an A on 32 rails takes more thought and finessing than most realize. I'm going to replace most of those sub rails and addressing that will yield about a 3/4" more channel.
    IMG_3597.JPG IMG_3600.JPG
     
    oliver westlund, Tim, brEad and 8 others like this.
  12. Last edited: Aug 22, 2021
  13. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    Tx Phil, I'll check it out.
     
    loudbang and dirty old man like this.
  14. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    Finally, the view I had imagined is becoming real. The box section, actually two channels, was the connection to the subrails, tying them together and providing the the foundation for the body mounts. You can see the rust in the distance, typical of much of the structure from the "B" pillar back and necessitated some reconstructive surgery.
    IMG_3614.JPG
    The following images illustrate a confirmation of my idea, i.e., that patching in a partial 32 Roadster/Coupe panel will move the termination of the rear sheet metal rearward several inches, covering more of the 32 tank. The finishing of the modification will be a sheet metal challenge for this hack. :eek:
    IMG_3621.JPG IMG_3618.JPG
     
    brEad, 63fdsnr, rockable and 4 others like this.
  15. That's a pretty cool idea.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  16. Looks like that's going to work good. The idea reminds me somewhat of the bustle back on a Vicky.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  17. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    The pics imply the look of a Victoria bustle but,....that's a panel beater challenge I'm not up for and would be "overkill" re nesting the 32 tank. The plan is to cutaway most of the '32 sheet metal to within 1/4" of the detail bead line traversing the panel, leaving that detail tilted forward where the Model A equivalent was tilted to the rear. That mod along with the raised location of the body termination yielding 2-3 inches more coverage of the tank.
     
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2021
  18. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    And, at the cowl, The goal is to raise the foot and nibble away at the sub structure to allow the cowl to drop down over the frame,....ultimately achieving a 1/2 to 3/4 inch channel. All that fiddle fuckin around to get the straight/flat section of the A sub rails down onto the straight/flat section of the 32 frame. :rolleyes:
    IMG_3632.JPG IMG_3636.JPG IMG_3657.JPG IMG_3662.JPG
     
  19. rockable
    Joined: Dec 21, 2009
    Posts: 4,449

    rockable
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  20. rockable
    Joined: Dec 21, 2009
    Posts: 4,449

    rockable
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    :D:D:D
    Keep after it Mr. Bill!
     
    loudbang likes this.
  21. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    Just to letcha know I'm still alive. The A has landed flat on the 32 frame. More in a few days.
    Nother pic better lit and w/o the stilts.
    IMG_3670.JPG
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2021
  22. That looks perfect! Measure twice cut once? I was definitely waiting for an update and a side profile pic.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  23. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    This made me laugh!!!!
    [​IMG]
     
  24. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    Finally,.... sucked it up and put the welder to work. Got the body mount at the cowl figgered out, bolted down and welded. That establishes both the amount of "channel" (about 3/4") and the rear wheel well location.
    IMG_3679.JPG IMG_3691.JPG
    I have bent-up some hat sections to rebuild the modified and rusty sub-rails. They will establish a new floor height, now elevated about 3/4".
    After visiting with a friend, I decided to correct and update the drawing below. The horizonal flange(s) of the "hat sections" are trimmed off at the red line. That's so's the remaining portions of the sub-frame will drop down to the 1" rubber body mount blocks.
     
    Last edited: Oct 25, 2021
  25. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

  26. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,624

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    Bill... Looking at your floor reminds me directly of the late Bill Burnham, and his '29 Highboy.
    I was building a '29 Highboy on gennie '32 rails, and asked Bill about his floor height...(recall his 6'4" height, I was 6'1")
    Instead of telling me 'how he'd dropped his floor', he stated he had raised it 1-1/2"!
    "Oh, Contraire!" said I, considering his lengthy frame...6'4" and compacting living space!
    Bill went on to say the 406 FE had somewhat altered his previous plans for floor height.

    I then installed my floor on modified hat structures 3/4" above original plan. No problem...my seat pad got thinner...
    Your sedan's 'profile' is envious. 'A' sedan properly mated to '32 rails is "Mona Lisa-ish". Classic.
     
    Special Ed, 40ply and kidcampbell71 like this.
  27. wstory
    Joined: Jul 4, 2008
    Posts: 1,725

    wstory
    Member
    from So Calif

    Cool Mike! Thanks for that. 'Tho I started playing with cars in '53 and did a little building and street racing, I diverted to a more mainstream lifestyle by '63. Never lost the interest but other priorities prevailed. Been back into it now since about 2000 and feel like a real neophyte. So much to learn from those who've been into it for 60-70 years. Finding out that many of the details I'm discovering and struggling with are the same that blokes have been addressing for decades.
     
  28. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,198

    73RR
    Member

    1953?? One of these?;)
    upload_2021-10-26_16-19-0.jpeg
     

    Attached Files:

  29. Fun to follow along on this one. My winter project is a 1931 Vicky on a 32 frame. I'm planning on a 1 1/2" - 2" channel on mine, so neat to see how this is going.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.