Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 32 Ford gas tank fuel line clearance problems

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Bcap55, Aug 22, 2021.

  1. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

    I ran into a problem with clearance for the fuel supply and return lines at the gas tank on my 32 Ford coupe project.
    I have a Brookville coupe body and a Tanks Inc. standard size gas tank. I had to use one of the Tanks Inc. in tank electric fuel pumps because I could not fit a mechanical pump with the motor mount I'm using, but the tank pickup fittings are the same for both.
    Here is the in tank pump fittings.
    IMG_1779.JPG
    Here is a photo of the pump fitting with the body on. (Sorry for the bad picture, it's difficult to get a good shot under there). The trunk floor actually sits on top of the inlet and outlet fittings and the vent fitting hits the angled part of the floor. The photo is a little deceiving, there is no way to connect to the tank fittings without hitting the trunk floor directly in front of them.
    IMG_1774.JPG
    What do you guys normally do to run the fuel lines to the tank?
    What do you do to get the trunk floor to not sit on top of the pump fittings?
    Here is the way I was trying to route the lines.
    IMG_1780.JPG
    I'm thinking about making more room for the fuel lines by cutting out a section of trunk floor as shown in the photo and moving the rear raised section of the floor forward to give me more space.
    IMG_1781.JPG
    What's my best option to fix this.
     
  2. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,462

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    I’d look for a way to clock the fuel pump if possible to put the fittings in a different direction.

    Even if that meant drilling new holes in the fuel pump flange to make it happen if it only fits that one way.

    Much easier than cutting the floor.

    724781F4-F9C1-4E55-AAE2-FFFDD1A9D9FB.jpeg
     
  3. Is the body directly on the frame, or are webbing or cushions in place? 1/4” might make a difference.
    Can you gain any room by bending up a 3/8 hard line with inverted flare nut
    and short 45* bend it toward the frame rail?
     
  4. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

    I tried it the way you show, but it places the supply connection in the same orientation as the vent outlet which ends up running directly into the trunk floor.
     

  5. Are you going to provide a tank maintenance access opening in the trunk floor?
    Or remove tank out the rear to service tank after body is installed?
     
    ekimneirbo and Tman like this.
  6. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 9,468

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    I have built over a dozen customer package deuce roadsters over the years and have had a similar problem on the few that I plumbed with fuel lines. Take a look at the brass fittings offered by McMaster Carr. I have used a 45 degree brass hose barb fitting that fits a lot tighter than what you are using.
     
    wfo guy and Tim like this.
  7. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

    I did shim up the body 1/4" just to clear the top of the fittings. The real problem is that there is not much room in front of the pump fittings. The fittings are 1/4 inch pipe thread. If I try to put any adapter fitting or short nipple in them it will hit the trunk floor leaving no room to attach a hose or tube.
    If you look at the photo of the pump assembly, you can see that there is not much distance from the center vent outlet hose barb which already is hitting the trunk floor and the threaded fittings.
     
  8. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

  9. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

    I did consider putting an access panel in the trunk floor, but I think it would be easier to just remove the tank for maintenance.
     
  10. Blue One
    Joined: Feb 6, 2010
    Posts: 11,462

    Blue One
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Alberta

    I think you’re wrong on that one. We recently lifted the pickup bed up with a chain hoist to change the fuel pump in my son’s OT Chevy truck and even that was way easier than removing the tank.

    If I had the choice, working through a good sized removable access panel would be preferable to trying to drain and drop a tank.
     
    beater32 likes this.
  11. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 19,259

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I hope you weren't really planning on using those "plumbing" pieces, they are the biggest part of your issue, and I'm with you on not wanting to stack up adapters (most of the time).
    A correctly oriented pair of the right adapter fittings such as AN style should get your lines pointing in the right direction. A small access "bump" is a good idea also if it's really needed.
    Yes, it's pretty tight under a deuce for anything other than stock but nearly a million modified deuces have been put on the road.
     
  12. beater32
    Joined: Mar 23, 2008
    Posts: 370

    beater32
    Member

    I made an access panel in the floor. Much easier to work with. It'll be a bitch tryng to remove the tank otherwise. Undoing the fittings with no access? Unless you run real long hoses!
     
    ct1932ford likes this.
  13. Kiwi 4d
    Joined: Sep 16, 2006
    Posts: 3,579

    Kiwi 4d
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Access door every time, then you can wire and plumb at your leisure , plus if there happens to be a small tank to sender leak you can deal with it. And you can also ensure nothing has moved and you are 100% happy with clearance. As @beater32 says how are you going to undo a tank fitting you cant see?
     
  14. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 9,468

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    That's the fitting I have used. Might have to install the fitting in the pickup before you install it in the tank? Also I have use just a 1/4 pipe to 3/8th hose barb fitting directly into the Tanks fitting. Either way it's more compact than what you currently have.
     
  15. evintho
    Joined: May 28, 2007
    Posts: 2,377

    evintho
    Member

    My '54 is a bit different than your deuce but I had the same issue with trunk floor clearance. With the pump installed, the fittings stood an inch above the trunk floor. I cut an access hole and built a raised cover to conceal/protect the fittings and fuel lines.

    IMG_2548.JPG

    IMG_2550.JPG
     
    pprather likes this.
  16. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

    No those are just pieces I used for a mockup. I do want to transition to some kind of AN fitting.
     
  17. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

    I think I will cut out the trunk floor section as shown in the photo. This will give me a better idea of what I have to use fitting wise to connect to the pump. It's hard to visualize what is needed in that tight space by looking in from the side with the body on.
    If I can do it without modifying the trunk floor I'll just weld that piece back in. I have feeling I'll have to have a raised trunk floor section above the pump to make it work with the AN fittings I want to use.
    As far as whether to use an access panel or not, my plan is to run hose sections from the pump over to the inside frame rail in front of the rear axle and connect to hard lines that will run along the frame to a filter and regulator and then to the firewall. If I need to remove the pump I would disconnect the hoses at the frame rail and then slide the tank out.
    If I have to modify the trunk floor and raise it, I'll consider putting an access panel there.
    I'll cut the floor tomorrow and post photos to let you guys see exactly what I'm dealing with and make a decision on how to make this work.
     
  18. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 9,468

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    When building a 32 with the tank in the rear it's always a good idea to have a hole in the trunk floor to access the sender and pickup unit. Henry Ford did it that way originally
     
    olscrounger and wfo guy like this.
  19. Fogger
    Joined: Aug 18, 2007
    Posts: 1,811

    Fogger
    Member

    I'm with the others who suggest an access panel in the trunk floor. My 3W, Roadster and '97 GMC all have modified access panels for fuel line connections and fuel pump. My GMC has over 300k miles on it and is on its 4th fuel pump. I can replace the fuel pump in 20 minutes. Make it easy for yourself and cut the hole.
     
  20. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

    So Brookville copied an original 3 window coupe to make their repro body and forgot to put in the access door.:)
    Well I'm convinced an access door is the way to go so I'll be doing that. I'll go ahead and raise the floor section since it will be getting modified for an access door.
     
    pprather likes this.
  21. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 2,320

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

     
  22. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 2,320

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    ^^^^ Yes access door is an option ..
    There is so many companies marketing """Made as Original """
    and there are completely not.
    I have had the same issues with Tanks / aftermarket fuel pump in Tank on steel Body's .
    Even with access door, ( will stick up higher then trunk/ floor pan. (5W & Sedan) So I used tight radius tube bender with rollers wheel . SS 3/8 tube removed the Square block (out) & return Fitting , fabricated 2 new Lines come down following the shape of the tank (back side of tank ) then turn towards passenger side rail ,& used A/N - Jic male # 6 on fuel ends ( both from pump In & out)
    ( Tig weld )
    You can use steel & mig , or copper Soldier if you prep clean well .

    Aeroquip makes the tightest Radius fitting witch are for PTFE steel braided line / hose
     
    Richard Head and Just Gary like this.
  23. An original for reference.
    [​IMG]
     
    19Eddy30 likes this.
  24. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 2,320

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    ^^^ like above ,then I turned towards frame rail.
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  25. He sure you shim the whole body the 1;4 inch.
     
  26. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 2,320

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    the only Body shims should be @ rear sub rail , @ least the 32s helped / worked on Full fender , I have not had a body off a 3w
     
    Just Gary likes this.
  27. Pete Eastwood
    Joined: Jul 27, 2011
    Posts: 1,324

    Pete Eastwood
    Member
    from california

    On an original '32 Ford , the access hole in the floor is over the bulkhead fittings at the forward edge of the gas tank .
    There is no access over the pickup / sending unit .
     
  28. Pete Eastwood
    Joined: Jul 27, 2011
    Posts: 1,324

    Pete Eastwood
    Member
    from california

    Anything higher than this is not going to clear the stock floor .
    Things are really tight right there .
     
  29. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

    Thanks for the photo, I was wondering how an original tank looked. That explains why there is so little room with the repro tank and the inlet-outlet fittings.
     
  30. Bcap55
    Joined: Oct 5, 2009
    Posts: 302

    Bcap55
    Member
    from PA, USA

    I cut out the floor above the pump to get a better idea of what needed to be done. I could instantly tell that I would have to move the angled floor section forward to make room for the fittings and hose that connect to the pump.
    You can see how little space there is between the pump fittings and the angled part of the trunk floor.
    IMG_1785.JPG
    IMG_1791.JPG
    I moved the cutout section forward a few inches and this gave me all the space needed to fit the fuel lines. Also moving the piece forward raised the rear section up about one inch, this will let me set the body on the frame without shimming the back to clear the pump fittings.
    IMG_1794.JPG
    Made some card board templates for the side pieces to box it in. I'll have to add a top piece to fill in, and decide what to do for an access hole. That's as far as I got today.
    IMG_1796.JPG
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.